In Biden's first year, economic growth reached a 37-year high

You only need two nations to have a full scale war.

There is nothing "full scale" about the Ukraine conflict no matter how stupid you look and pound your tiny fists on the table and demand that it is. You look stupid. Stop already. :palm:

Biden has a 50 year career of sitting down with different parties and working things out. For you not to realize this is saying a lot about you.

Wrong sad sack. He has a 50 year career as an unaccomplished, corrupt political hack who always makes the WRING decisions. HIs first year in office is a shining example.

However, you being an uneducated, historically and economically ignorant, low IQ, gullible dumbass on steroids think he's awesome.
:palm:
 
Economic shrinkage is the opposite of economic growth. Inflation can coexist with economic growth.

No, it cannot. You should read up on things before you bloviate like a moron.

Name one nation that prospered with nearly double digit inflation simpleton? Inflation has historically been a nation killer. Usually you see it in third world shit holes using the same policies the Democrats desperately want to unilaterally implement without opposition.
:palm:
 
So things are awesome right now halfwit? :palm:

You seem to have a lot of trouble understanding simple statements. I have clearly said that things are extremely mixed and confusing right now. We may look back on this and say this is the beginning of awesome, but no one would look at this now and say it is awesome.
 
Another lefty lie.


You do realize just how much money we are "printing", right?

There has not been one democrat or lefty on this board that has a functional clue about the economy or how this country is actually run. They will all lie that they do. Until they post. Then the ignorance and lack of knowledge comes shining through every, single time.
 
in an interesting coincidence both Biden's fantastic economic growth and his inflation are the highest since Jimmy Carter was president.......does anyone think the lib'ruls will realize why?......
 
It wasn't. I quoted the entire post and it made no reference to a continual loss. Instead, it specifically referenced improvement until you were in a position to pay down debt. You just chose to lie about it, as you know.



No, dummy, I didn't say that. Reducing debt generally requires running a surplus. What I very clearly discussed was a period when the government, despite generally running deficits year after year, REDUCED DEBT AS A SHARE OF GDP, and thus made it a smaller relative burden. Go back and reread. Then, once you've confirmed that's what I actually said, if you have the character, apologize for libeling me. I won't hold my breath. Right-wingers lie shamelessly, so even after you confirm that you misstated my argument, I don't expect you'll apologize.

There is no surplus. The government is broke.
 
Back
Top