In the coming days of the Iran conflict.........

[Stone]

" Barack Obama used the common transition phrase "in the coming days" across multiple addresses, press statements, and weekly radio addresses during his presidency. Because it is a standard rhetorical filler used to denote upcoming actions or announcements rather than the title of a specific address, no single definitive speech is uniquely identified by this phrase. "

 

[Stone]

There is zero percent doubt. The guy obviously loves Neocon wars.

I support our Troops first and foremost. There have been many engagements I thought we should have avoided. BUT........as I have said many times,....once something begins we must stand together instead of using it as a political wedge. This way it ends quicker with less suffering for all involved. THIS is how our country used to function. Not anymore. Now our own countrymen have been turned into a bunch of Tokyo Rose's to dishearten the nation in a lame effort to get more people to vote for a particular political party. This too will be remembered. You are scum. The lowest of the low.

 

[Walt]

Why in the world would you and you're ilk think that pulling up old posts of mine would have any effect on me at all? You have never heard of time frames in regards to ANYTHING being fluid? Walt,..........sometimes you guys just make me roll my eyes and LMAO. A lot of times actually.

You being constantly wrong does not effect you, but it does effect how the rest of us see you.

 

[Stone]

In the mind of a modern day Democrat the ONLY war that should ever receive any support whatsoever is one that begins with a President in office that happens to be a Democrat. Any and all wars, police actions, interventions that happen with a Republican President in office are to be absolutely demonized with a national campaign begun with the intent to lower the moral of the American people. This is what it is.........point blank. Yes.........you people are scum.

 

[Stone]

You being constantly wrong does not effect you, but it does effect how the rest of us see you.

First,...I am wrong much LESS than you for one thing. Second,.......why on Earth would I give 2 shits about how some idiots on an obscure message board SEE ME? That would be idiotic. Do you care Walt? Do you actually care how other board members here SEE YOU? How absurd. If so,...that would explain an awful lot when it comes to you're obvious character faults.

 

[Stone]

Secondly,.........as someone who votes differently then Walt and his ilk do I would ALWAYS be seen in a negative light no matter what I believed in,....so you see Walt ,...none of this matters, at all. To Walt and his ilk anyone who votes differently then he does are nothing more than racist, fascist, greedy, selfish, supremacist, violent Nazi's. This is what the left has said about us going back DECADES. And you somehow think that any of us actually care how YOU SEE US? Excuse me but............

 

[Cypress]

interventions that happen with a Republican President in office are to be absolutely demonized!........you people are scum!

Wrong.
I never complained about a military conflict where we had a president skilled enough to convince our NATO allies was necessary and warranted. Convincing 20 NATO countries of the necessity of a military action indicates to me the cause is justified. I did not complain when George Dubya attacked Afghanistan in 2001 or when Poppy Bush the elder liberated Kuwait. Reagan even got a multinational joint European-American force to intervene in Lebanon in 1983, and I did not complain.

 

[Stone]

Wrong.
I never complained about a military conflict where we had a president skilled enough to convince our NATO allies was necessary and warranted. Convincing 20 NATO allies of the necessity of a military action indicates to me the cause is justified. I did not complain when George Dubya attacked Afghanistan or when Poppy Bush the elder liberated Kuwait.

Lie.

 

[Stone]

Walt,...........are you so blind and Gas lit that you do not see what you and your ilk have done? Don't you understand what it means? It means you have half of the country not caring one bit what you think about us or anything else you may have to say. You have spent decades turning us into OBJECTS and targets of you're hate instead of PEOPLE,......and now we have done the same. Do you not get how very very dangerous that is ? Have fun with ALL that.

 

[Cypress]

Lie!

Has a drug induced haze made you forget American history? Almost the entire nation as well as our NATO allies backed attacking Afghanistan in 2001. I think the vote in the Senate was unanimous.

Poppy Bush got the UN and NATO allies to participate in the liberation of Kuwait. In 1991, I supported the liberation of Kuwait and thought Poppy showed a high level of skill of building international consensus.

 

[Stone]

Has a drug induced haze made you forget American history? Almost the entire nation as well as our NATO allies backed attacking Afghanistan in 2001. I think the vote in the Senate was unanimous.

Poppy Bush got the UN and NATO allies to participate in the liberation of Kuwait. In 1991, I supported the liberation of Kuwait and thought Poppy showed a high level of skill of building international consensus.

LIE.....you and your people used it as a wedge issue going forward. Oh,...and unlike YOU and yours I use no drugs. Never have. I even find Weed offensive.

 

[Stone]

Cypress= LIAR


AI Overview



Most congressional Democrats opposed the 1991 Gulf War, casting the majority of votes against the authorization of military force, though public anti-war demonstrations featured mixed political alignments rather than being strictly partisan.
Reddit·r/AskALiberal +2


Congressional Opposition

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• • House Vote: A majority of House Democrats (179 against vs. 86 in favor) voted against the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 1991.
    
  • Senate Vote: Senate Democrats divided more closely, with 45 opposed and 10 voting in favor of authorizing force.
    The Temple News +1
    
  • Leadership and Caucuses: Prominent vocal dissent came from progressive blocks and the Congressional Black Caucus, who argued for continuing economic sanctions rather than initiating military action.

 

[Cypress]

LIE.....you and your people used it as a wedge issue going forward. Oh,...and unlike YOU and yours I use no drugs. Never have. I even find Weed offensive.

I don't use drugs or alcohol. You seem drunk if you forgot support for the attack on Afghanistan was nearly unanimous

Look up the vote in the US Senate to approve attacking Afghanistan. I believe you will find the vote was unanimous.

It took years for anyone to seriously get fed up with how poorly Bush managed the occupation. Obama ran in 2008 saying our focus should always have been Afghanistan, not Iraq.

 

[Stone]

Congressional Opposition

• • House Vote: A majority of House Democrats (179 against vs. 86 in favor) voted against the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 1991.
    
  • Senate Vote: Senate Democrats divided more closely, with 45 opposed and 10 voting in favor of authorizing force.
    The Temple News +1
    
  • Leadership and Caucuses: Prominent vocal dissent came from progressive blocks and the Congressional Black Caucus, who argued for continuing economic sanctions rather than initiating military action.
    CQ Press +1
    

Public Protests

• • Demonstrations: Thousands of anti-war protesters gathered in cities like Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles in January 1991 to condemn President George H.W. Bush's push toward conflict.
    Los Angeles Times +1
    
  • Participant Demographics: As noted on platforms like Reddit discussing the era, opinions on the scope of the movement are mixed; crowds included a broad mix of independent activists, left-leaning groups, and citizens rather than official Democratic Party-organized delegations.

 

[Stone]

Has a drug induced haze made you forget American history? Almost the entire nation as well as our NATO allies backed attacking Afghanistan in 2001. I think the vote in the Senate was unanimous.

Poppy Bush got the UN and NATO allies to participate in the liberation of Kuwait. In 1991, I supported the liberation of Kuwait and thought Poppy showed a high level of skill of building international consensus.

I literally just posted the proof of all the opposition to the 91 invasion.

 

[Stone]

Cypress= LIAR.

 

[Cypress]

I literally just posted the proof of all the opposition to the 91 invasion.

I only speak for me.
But you proved that there were a significant amount of Democrats in congress who authorized Bush to kick Saddam out of Kuwait

 

[Stone]

I only speak for me.

You speak for nobody,....not even yourself. Remember now,.......you are posting with an evil, racist, warmongering, fascist, violent, supremacist ,Nazi. THAT is what we have been told by YOU are you're ilk for decades now. Good luck with all that.......

 

[Cypress]

You speak for nobody!

Wrong. I speak for me. And it obviously makes you angry that I supported the liberation of Kuwait in 1991 and the attack on Afghanistan in 2001 because it doesn't jive with your preconceived narrative.

 

[Stone]

Wrong. I speak for me. And it obviously makes you angry that I supported the liberation of Kuwait in 1991 and the attack on Afghanistan in 2001 because it doesn't jive with your preconceived narrative.

I showed you the absolute PROOF of what YOU and your party did back then. What YOU and your shit party have done since the 60's. Its who you are. You people could care less about our troops. Its ALL about political points with you people,...nothing more.

This is your history,..........you piece of shit. OWN IT.