Intell: Russia Interfering Again. We Don't Want To Know. Shoot The Messenger.

PoliTalker said:
Hello domer 76,



And you think this is a great argument for progressive policies?

This just makes it look like you can't think of anything better to say than insults.

And I know that's not true.
Click to expand...

I was responding to another RW moron that can’t distinguish an adjective from a proper noun. My response had ZERO to do with progressive policy or any policy for that matter.
 
PoliTalker said:
Our top intelligence official to Congress: Russia is at it again.

The response from the WH?

Fire the person with the bad news. Replace him with a neophyte who knows nothing about how to do the job. But he is totally loyal to DT personally.

"The Times reported that lawmakers were told Russia is interfering in the 2020 election specifically to get Trump reelected."

"After the classified briefing, Trump brought Maguire into the Oval Office for a "dressing down," The Post reported."

"According to The Post, the briefing was the "catalyst" for the president's decision to replace Maguire with Richard Grenell, a controversial figure and fierce loyalist who has served as the US ambassador to Germany."

Grenell has no experience or background in intelligence but is now charged with overseeing the 17 agencies that make up the US intelligence community."

"Trump has continued to exhibit skepticism, despite ongoing warnings from the US intelligence community about the potential for Russia, among other countries, to interfere in the 2020 election.

The US intelligence community, which the president has repeatedly expressed animosity toward over the course of his tenure, concluded with high confidence in 2017 that Russia interfered in 2016 to propel Trump to the Oval Office.

The Senate Intelligence Committee in July 2018 released a report backing up the intelligence community's findings.

In October, the committee released a report urging Trump to "reinforce with the public the danger" posed by foreign election interference leading up to the 2020 election."

Business Insider Story follows similar stories in Washington Post and New York Times
Click to expand...

Even CNN is walking this stupid shit back. Thinking people knew it was fake news right off the bat, but even liberal retards have to admit it now. Yes you I'm talking to you.

US intelligence briefer appears to have overstated assessment of 2020 Russian interference

Washington(CNN)The US intelligence community's top election security official appears to have overstated the intelligence community's formal assessment of Russian interference in the 2020 election, omitting important nuance during a briefing with lawmakers earlier this month, three national security officials told CNN.
 
Good morning domer76,

domer76 said:
I was responding to another RW moron that can’t distinguish an adjective from a proper noun. My response had ZERO to do with progressive policy or any policy for that matter.
Click to expand...

That was precisely what struck me. We'd be better off by making our case based on the differences of POV.

Stone made a statement. He didn't insult anybody personally. He expressed a view:

Stone said:
By the time Trump gets done with his second term the democrat party we have come to know wont even exist anymore. he will have helped successfully destroy it. Much of the damage will have been done by themselves though. The old school types will get absorbed into the Republican ranks, while the far left goes off the rails and ends up shrinking. SWEET!
Click to expand...

You didn't try to dispute his remark. Instead you decided to hurl insults. I don't think that's a very effective way of making the case that his thinking is flawed. He was right, though, when he said it triggered you.

Here's how it came across to this observer: He stated a political view. It set you off and you lost your cool. And I know you can do better than that.

Here's all you had to say:

Hello Stone,

DT is not getting a second term. Democrats are pretty hard to unite because there are so many free thinkers under that umbrella. So many diverse views and perspectives there. People really think for themselves before becoming Democrats. They do not fall in line like Republicans. That can make it hard for Democrats to take power, unite behind one leader, one concept. Republicans have it easy in that respect. Their narrow platform is totally take it or leave it. If you're on board they you buy in to the whole enchilada. It's all or nothing with the Republican party. Anybody who speaks out against party of it is thrown out, called a RINO. There is a reason there is no similar thing such as a 'DINO.'

Obama and DT have one thing in common. Both of them managed to unite the Democratic party. I really think DT has been more effective at it. Obama had a tough time herding the cats. But one thing is certain. Democrats are united behind one concept. Beat DT. No second term. One and done. Most of them are not sure who to rally behind but have said no matter who it is, they are voting to convict DT of his impeachment on November 3rd. And the more outrageous he gets, the more united Democrats are against him. DT managed to motivate a lot of new voters for 2016. Looks like he is about to motivate even more people to vote on November 3rd - AGAINST HIM.

Because really, the very thought of him in the WH is an outrage. His whole plan to get elected in 2016 was to get people angry enough to vote. And that will be his undoing in 2020.
 
PoliTalker said:
Good morning domer76,



That was precisely what struck me. We'd be better off by making our case based on the differences of POV.

Stone made a statement. He didn't insult anybody personally. He expressed a view:



You didn't try to dispute his remark. Instead you decided to hurl insults. I don't think that's a very effective way of making the case that his thinking is flawed. He was right, though, when he said it triggered you.

Here's how it came across to this observer: He stated a political view. It set you off and you lost your cool. And I know you can do better than that.

Here's all you had to say:

Hello Stone,

DT is not getting a second term. Democrats are pretty hard to unite because there are so many free thinkers under that umbrella. So many diverse views and perspectives there. People really think for themselves before becoming Democrats. They do not fall in line like Republicans. That can make it hard for Democrats to take power, unite behind one leader, one concept. Republicans have it easy in that respect. Their narrow platform is totally take it or leave it. If you're on board they you buy in to the whole enchilada. It's all or nothing with the Republican party. Anybody who speaks out against party of it is thrown out, called a RINO. There is a reason there is no similar thing such as a 'DINO.'

Obama and DT have one thing in common. Both of them managed to unite the Democratic party. I really think DT has been more effective at it. Obama had a tough time herding the cats. But one thing is certain. Democrats are united behind one concept. Beat DT. No second term. One and done. Most of them are not sure who to rally behind but have said no matter who it is, they are voting to convict DT of his impeachment on November 3rd. And the more outrageous he gets, the more united Democrats are against him. DT managed to motivate a lot of new voters for 2016. Looks like he is about to motivate even more people to vote on November 3rd - AGAINST HIM.

Because really, the very thought of him in the WH is an outrage. His whole plan to get elected in 2016 was to get people angry enough to vote. And that will be his undoing in 2020.
Click to expand...

Let’s try this again.

His uneducated grammar is flawed. I made no statement about any policy.

Anyone that can’t tell the difference between:

Democrat
democrat
Democratic Party
democratic

is a fucking rube.

You probably prefer:

“Me and him”
“I seen it”
“I done it”

It’s reflective of ignorance. And I point out ignorance. Untriggered.
 
PoliTalker said:
Our top intelligence official to Congress: Russia is at it again.

The response from the WH?

Fire the person with the bad news. Replace him with a neophyte who knows nothing about how to do the job. But he is totally loyal to DT personally.

"The Times reported that lawmakers were told Russia is interfering in the 2020 election specifically to get Trump reelected."

"After the classified briefing, Trump brought Maguire into the Oval Office for a "dressing down," The Post reported."

"According to The Post, the briefing was the "catalyst" for the president's decision to replace Maguire with Richard Grenell, a controversial figure and fierce loyalist who has served as the US ambassador to Germany."

Grenell has no experience or background in intelligence but is now charged with overseeing the 17 agencies that make up the US intelligence community."

"Trump has continued to exhibit skepticism, despite ongoing warnings from the US intelligence community about the potential for Russia, among other countries, to interfere in the 2020 election.

The US intelligence community, which the president has repeatedly expressed animosity toward over the course of his tenure, concluded with high confidence in 2017 that Russia interfered in 2016 to propel Trump to the Oval Office.

The Senate Intelligence Committee in July 2018 released a report backing up the intelligence community's findings.

In October, the committee released a report urging Trump to "reinforce with the public the danger" posed by foreign election interference leading up to the 2020 election."

Business Insider Story follows similar stories in Washington Post and New York Times
Click to expand...

Russia doesn't have the ability to interfere with U.S.elections. They can't vote. The election system is by paper, and no tabulating machine is connected to the internet.
 
domer76 said:
Let’s try this again.

His uneducated grammar is flawed. I made no statement about any policy.

Anyone that can’t tell the difference between:

Democrat
democrat
Democratic Party
democratic

is a fucking rube.

You probably prefer:

“Me and him”
“I seen it”
“I done it”

It’s reflective of ignorance. And I point out ignorance. Untriggered.
Click to expand...

I was typing on a small google chrome book, which is a pain in the ass for me. I tend not to care so much about grammar and capitalization in those situations and just consider myself lucky to get a post out at all. Most intelligent people like your friend above tend to care more about the content. You would do well to do the same.
 
Stone said:
I was typing on a small google chrome book, which is a pain in the ass for me. I tend not to care so much about grammar and capitalization in those situations and just consider myself lucky to get a post out at all. Most intelligent people like your friend above tend to care more about the content. You would do well to do the same.
Click to expand...

:lolup:

Fucking illiterate rube.

:rofl2:
 
domer76 said:
:lolup:

Fucking illiterate rube.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Still triggered I see. I will take great pleasure in reading your posts after the upcoming election. ;) Unless you turn out to be one of those people that hides in shame that is. Either way,.... thanks in advance for the schadenfreude!
 
Stone said:
Still triggered I see. I will take great pleasure in reading your posts after the upcoming election. ;) Unless you turn out to be one of those people that hides in shame that is. Either way,.... thanks in advance for the schadenfreude!
Click to expand...

No hiding for me, illiterate dumbfuck. Regardless of who wins the election, you’ll still be illiterate.
 
domer76 said:
No hiding for me, illiterate dumbfuck. Regardless of who wins the election, you’ll still be illiterate.
Click to expand...
And you will still be a beggar wanting to confiscate the money of other better men than yourself because you are unable to be financially independent. There will always be winners and losers in life. Enjoy your stay at the bottom.
 
Stone said:
And you will still be a beggar wanting to confiscate the money of other better men than yourself because you are unable to be financially independent. There will always be winners and losers in life. Enjoy your stay at the bottom.
Click to expand...

:lolup:

I’m set for life, you stupid bitch. A pension til the day I die. If my spouse survives me, it continues until her death. Combine that with social security and our combined 401k accounts, I have ZERO worries, tardboy.

:rofl2:
 
domer76 said:
:lolup:

I’m set for life, you stupid bitch. A pension til the day I die. If my spouse survives me, it continues until her death. Combine that with social security and our combined 401k accounts, I have ZERO worries, tardboy.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Whooaaa hoho hooooooooo....BIGTIME TRIGGERED! LMAO.
 
domer76 said:
:lolup:

I’m set for life, you stupid bitch. A pension til the day I die. If my spouse survives me, it continues until her death. Combine that with social security and our combined 401k accounts, I have ZERO worries, tardboy.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

BTW.....Welfare is not a pension, nor are food stamps a 401K. Just so you know. Glad I could be of help.
 
Its o.k pal, we believe you,....REALLY WE DO. LMAO! You should have listened to your buddy when he was trying to help you. This isnt a good look for you, to say the least.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top