Is dump going to call this domestic terroism?

that murderer is a superhero of Barack's Zombie Apocalypse army. Barack's white house, DOJ and State department started all of these terrorist organizations which that zombie bastard ascribed to. it is terrorism and until the heads of these terrorists snakes are crushed and there are a few soldiers to do their damned job against these domestic enemies , there will be ever increasing bloodshed...trump and his DOJ seem to be allowing these terrorist/ domestic enemies to propagate their terrorism. I am pissed. trump's sappy "love" whatever comment was ridiculous; real love would end this cycle of death at it's source : BLM, ANTIFA, ISIS, etc. and retroactively condemn the perpetrators to death: eye for eye, blood for blood, life for life. the damned do not live by grace through faith therefore they are supposed to be judged by the law. I testify that the perpetrators which have caused mostly all bloodshed in this land since 2009 are all workers of the U.S. Gov.presidential administration of Barack Hussein Obama.
 
Last edited:
archives said:
Shooting 58 people is an act of terror, whether it has a political motivation or not, it is terrorism

The President isn't going to touch that, what will happen, and I've already seen it in their media, the right is going to say the left is politicalizing it because they are raising the issue of guns in America, the false equilivancy we see any time the preponderance of guns in America exhibits itself
Click to expand...
So for you, its the number of people killed ?

Exactly what is the number that makes it an act of terrorism ?
 
TTQ64 said:
Why won't he call this terrorism?
Click to expand...

I have always said that in the grand scheme of things we are in greater danger from bat shit crazy white dudes bent on mass murder, than we are from the Daesh gang of criminal terrorists.
And this tragic turn of events only strengthens my thesis!
 
Cypress said:
I have always said that in the grand scheme of things we are in greater danger from bat shit crazy white dudes bent on mass murder, than we are from the Daesh gang of criminal terrorists.
And this tragic turn of events only strengthens my thesis!
Click to expand...

I reckon you say that you are some kind of fucking genius too. keep on saying to yourself. it is okay for you to talk to yourself.
 
TTQ64 said:
What part of unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property don't you understand? That alone qualifies as a terrorist.

He fucking terrorized 20K people at a concert killing 58+.........stop trying to protect white men as if they can't be terrorist.

He intended to use force and violence to kill.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm sure all those people were terrified. I'm pretty sure ANYONE being ASSAULTED or MURDERED feels pretty terrified. So I guess you would agree, this fits the bolded description of assault and murder? Now, plug this guy in with a political or religious agenda, I'll call it terrorism for all the difference it'll make. In fact, isis took credit for this(they may be lying), and I'm betting the gun he used turns out to be a belt fed 7.62mm machine gun(just speculation because of the sound of it), and those weapons are not easy to get in this country(but they are all over the battlefields of the middle east). So whatever, let the authorities do their jobs and we can label the guy later. For all the good it'll do.
 
Damocles said:
Again, he committed mass murder, but without the "in furtherance of political or social objectives" the elements of the crime of terrorism are not present and it would not be terrorism. He terrified people, but didn't commit terrorism unless we find some specific political or social objective that he attempted to promote or "further" as the law states. The "or" that you keep bolding doesn't change that it is a separator of actions before the motivation element of the crime of terrorism. You can do this or that, or the other thing, in furtherance of... just "this" isn't enough for terrorism unless you find the "furtherance of" element.

He did the first part "this", but the other element necessary for that designation "in furtherance of" at this time is not in evidence.
Click to expand...
You are wasting your time, she is a moron.
 
christiefan915 said:
I agreed with this: "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives" (28 C.F.R.)

It doesn't say any violence.
Click to expand...
This definition in Collins does.

Terrorism is the use of violence, especially murder and bombing, in order to achieve political aims or to force a government to do something.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/terrorism
 
let's just cut to the quick.......if the guy turns out to be a right wing extremist then this is all Trump's fault for triggering him..........if the guy turns out to be a left wing extremist then this is all Trump's fault for triggering him,......if the guy turns out to be any other kind of extremist this is all Trump's fault for not stopping him.......if he turns out to be a Vietnam vet with trauma it is Trump's fault for starting the Vietnam War and not spending enough to help vets with psychiatric care.......
 
iewitness said:
that murderer is a superhero of Barack's Zombie Apocalypse army. Barack's white house, DOJ and State department started all of these terrorist organizations which that zombie bastard ascribed to. it is terrorism and until the heads of these terrorists snakes are crushed and there are a few soldiers to do their damned job against these domestic enemies , there will be ever increasing bloodshed...trump and his DOJ seem to be allowing these terrorist/ domestic enemies to propagate their terrorism. I am pissed. trump's sappy "love" whatever comment was ridiculous; real love would end this cycle of death at it's source : BLM, ANTIFA, ISIS, etc. and retroactively condemn the perpetrators to death: eye for eye, blood for blood, life for life. the damned do not live by grace through faith therefore they are supposed to be judged by the law. I testify that the perpetrators which have caused mostly all bloodshed in this land since 2009 are all workers of the U.S. Gov.presidential administration of Barack Hussein Obama.
Click to expand...
Fuck you
 
PostmodernProphet said:
let's just cut to the quick.......if the guy turns out to be a right wing extremist then this is all Trump's fault for triggering him..........if the guy turns out to be a left wing extremist then this is all Trump's fault for triggering him,......if the guy turns out to be any other kind of extremist this is all Trump's fault for not stopping him.......if he turns out to be a Vietnam vet with trauma it is Trump's fault for starting the Vietnam War and not spending enough to help vets with psychiatric care.......
Click to expand...
Fuck you
 
Damocles said:
Again, he committed mass murder, but without the "in furtherance of political or social objectives" the elements of the crime of terrorism are not present and it would not be terrorism. He terrified people, but didn't commit terrorism unless we find some specific political or social objective that he attempted to promote or "further" as the law states. The "or" that you keep bolding doesn't change that it is a separator of actions before the motivation element of the crime of terrorism. You can do this or that, or the other thing, in furtherance of... just "this" isn't enough for terrorism unless you find the "furtherance of" element.

He did the first part "this", but the other element necessary for that designation "in furtherance of" at this time is not in evidence.
Click to expand...

The liberal wanted definition of "terrorism" would fit bank robbers, snatch and grab convenience robberies, antifa, serial rapists, carjackers, inner city gangs, rioters, home invaders, etc.
 
Last edited:
TTQ64 said:
When has the definition of terrorism changed?

"the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives" (28 C.F.R.

He fits the bolded description
Click to expand...
Uhhh which is like only half the definition. I define a cookie as a small sweet cake so ergo by your logic anything small and sweet is a cookie? That’s not logical.
 
Covfefe said:
I wonder why it has to be politically motivated, all those people were obviously terrified.
its making a lot of people fearful of attending these types of events.
Click to expand...

You mean like how antifa causes those wanting to attend a political rally, worried about being attacked??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top