Is Iran a terrorist nation ?

good question..Maybe if we ask them really nice like they'll stop their ballistic missile testing
( which they never did during the Obama Iran deal) and funding terrorism + their hegemonic Quds force they'll stop

The mullahs are just misunderstood. poor things

In the meantime your cohorts in No. Korea are now a certified nuclear power.
 
Russia has recently upgraded Tartus to a full port with dry dock capabilities, and they've built airbases and troop bases for their military there.

So they are spending a lot just to keep Syrian in their sphere of influence -yes


The Russians made it quite clear from the outset that any interference with Tartus was a red line. Tartus is Russia's warm-water port.
Russian support for Syria against US/Izraeli hegemony has prevented Izrael's desired American war on Iran. Izrael could never risk open conflict with Iran with anti-Zionist Syria next door.
Thus Russia's presence in the Middle East is essential for world peace.
 
According to Ezekiel 38 there will be an invasion of Israel by Iran, Somalia, Armenia, Germany, headed by Russia. Interestingly, no Arab nations are mentioned in the invasion.

While most theologians abandon the literal interpretation when they get to prophetic passages, they attempt to place this invasion with Armageddon or at the end of the Millennial Kingdom.

However, it takes place before the coming 7 years Tribulation. It has to because it says that the Jews will be burying the dead and burning their weapons for 7 years. Thus it must happen before the trib since the Jews have to flee the land at the midpoint when the Antichrist turns on them.

No charge for that literal rendering of the text.
 
kaffer-kicker;
y9q63zsu


After observing you for several months, I'm inclined to believe you are insane.

Quit your babbling- you'll get a sore sphincter.
 
yea sure blame the cia for Iran being a bung of religious nut cakes

yeah. it's their fault.

On Aug. 19, 2013, the CIA publicly admitted for the first time its involvement in the 1953 coup against Iran's elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.


1952: Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.
Keystone/Getty Images
The documents provided details of the CIA's plan at the time, which was led by senior officer Kermit Roosevelt Jr., the grandson of U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. Over the course of four days in August 1953, Roosevelt would orchestrate not one, but two attempts to destabilize the government of Iran, forever changing the relationship between the country and the U.S. In this episode, we go back to retrace what happened in the inaugural episode of NPR's new history podcast, Throughline.

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/31/690363402/how-the-cia-overthrew-irans-democracy-in-four-days
 
In the context of the thread title- it's fact that Iran was attacked by the West in 1953 for the simple reason that the Iranians wanted to nationalize their oil fields. The West is the aggressor- and armed resistance is NOT terrorism to anybody other than Western aggressors.
The reasoning shifts as Iran's oil becomes less important and the current reasoning for threatening Iran comes from the Izraeli fascists- who dictate American policy via AIPAC and Washington Neo-Zionists, such as Trump. There will never be a ' Greater Izrael ' because Iran will never permit further Izraeli expansion. Iran will continue to support both Syria and Lebanon in order to keep the pariah Izraelis in their box. Attacking Iran is not an option either- as Iran is now backed by both Russia and China.
Taking the long view, Izrael is fucked- and the sooner that the US unshackles itself the better for everybody. Supporting Izrael is backing a loser. The watching world knows that Izrael is the terrorist state- not Iran. Anybody thinking differently has been conditioned into believing that Izraelis are victims. They're not.
 
Ol' Zeke must have been out of his tree. Israel has only existed since 1948.

No problem. Like I said, I’m here to serve, what I post is the literal interpretation of the Hebrew writings which presupposes the entire counsel of the word as historical fact. No one has to agree, I’m merely stating the literal interpretations.


Bless you my child
 
In the context of the thread title- it's fact that Iran was attacked by the West in 1953 for the simple reason that the Iranians wanted to nationalize their oil fields. The West is the aggressor- and armed resistance is NOT terrorism to anybody other than Western aggressors.
The reasoning shifts as Iran's oil becomes less important and the current reasoning for threatening Iran comes from the Izraeli fascists- who dictate American policy via AIPAC and Washington Neo-Zionists, such as Trump. There will never be a ' Greater Izrael ' because Iran will never permit further Izraeli expansion. Iran will continue to support both Syria and Lebanon in order to keep the pariah Izraelis in their box. Attacking Iran is not an option either- as Iran is now backed by both Russia and China.
Taking the long view, Izrael is fucked- and the sooner that the US unshackles itself the better for everybody. Supporting Izrael is backing a loser. The watching world knows that Izrael is the terrorist state- not Iran. Anybody thinking differently has been conditioned into believing that Izraelis are victims. They're not.

Poor Iran. We know.


Bless you my child
 
No problem. Like I said, I’m here to serve, what I post is the literal interpretation of the Hebrew writings which presupposes the entire counsel of the word as historical fact. No one has to agree, I’m merely stating the literal interpretations.


Bless you my child

Extrapolating from your own reasoning- if scribes have been doing the same as you for centuries then the Christian bible and all other ' ancient ' religious texts are nothing more than opinionated drivel, ' literal interpretations' of literal interpretations. Your ' word of god ' or that of his followers , fraudulent in the first instance, albeit possibly well-meaning- now in its umpteenth edition- is propaganda with a halo.


Interpret and regurgitate that.
 
In the meantime your cohorts in No. Korea are now a certified nuclear power.
ROFL.. you mean the continuance of the inevitable?
the difference is NK isn't doing anything but lobbing them into the Sea of Japan,and not firing them OVER Japan
 
Extrapolating from your own reasoning- if scribes have been doing the same as you for centuries then the Christian bible and all other ' ancient ' religious texts are nothing more than opinionated drivel, ' literal interpretations' of literal interpretations. Your ' word of god ' or that of his followers , fraudulent in the first instance, albeit possibly well-meaning- now in its umpteenth edition- is propaganda with a halo.


Interpret and regurgitate that.

“If” is your key word mooned. Obviously you’ve never once picked up the holy writ.


Bless you my child
 
yeah. it's their fault.

On Aug. 19, 2013, the CIA publicly admitted for the first time its involvement in the 1953 coup against Iran's elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.


1952: Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.
Keystone/Getty Images
The documents provided details of the CIA's plan at the time, which was led by senior officer Kermit Roosevelt Jr., the grandson of U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. Over the course of four days in August 1953, Roosevelt would orchestrate not one, but two attempts to destabilize the government of Iran, forever changing the relationship between the country and the U.S. In this episode, we go back to retrace what happened in the inaugural episode of NPR's new history podcast, Throughline.

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/31/690363402/how-the-cia-overthrew-irans-democracy-in-four-days

The middle easterners I know remember the Iran overthrow very well. It was done for oil.
 
“If” is your key word mooned. Obviously you’ve never once picked up the holy writ.

I used ' if ' as a conditional in order to elicit a response . The fact that you've dodged making a response implies that you know full well that ' holy texts ' have been rewritten over time.
There is proof of this, of course but people are quite capable of believing the logic of it without any.

Turns Out The Original Bible Is Drastically Different From The Version You Grew Up With

https://www.ranker.com/list/has-the-bible-changed/jacob-shelton

As for my own familiarity with ' the holy writ '- nearly all Western-educated children are forced to consult it, by adult bigots, at some point in their education. Do you imagine being such an educator yourself ?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top