Hey, lefties, when the crims that were let out of jail by the people you voted for come for you and there are no more cops, you're on your own.
Try this:
Try this:
It occurs to me
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
Crims would be smart to use this to ID their targets once the police are gone and the prisons shut down...
View: https://x.com/shortmagsmle/status/2092728826996363545?s=20
View: https://x.com/shortmagsmle/status/2092728826996363545?s=20
I doubt any leftist can grasp the concept.
View: https://x.com/thenodeproject/status/2094840747065282731?s=20
View: https://x.com/thenodeproject/status/2094840747065282731?s=20
What would likely happen nationwide if police and prisons were abolished?
Here is the answer:
If both institutions disappeared at once, the immediate mechanisms that currently limit serious crime would stop working:
The nearest large-scale test was the 2020–2021 drop in stops, arrests, and proactive policing in many U.S. cities.
Homicides jumped about 25–30% nationally in one year—the biggest increase in decades—and the extra deaths were concentrated in cities and among black victims.
Places that reduced enforcement the most (Austin, Portland, Minneapolis and others) saw some of the steepest spikes. When arrests and stops later rose again in several of those cities, homicides fell.
That pattern matches a large body of research: focused police presence reduces violent and property crime; removing it raises both.
Nationwide abolition would scale that effect up.
Expected results:
Crime. Rapid, large increases in homicide, robbery, carjacking, aggravated assault, and open theft.
Repeat violent offenders would remain in circulation. Clearance rates, already low for many crimes, would fall further.
Who pays. The heaviest costs would fall on poor and working-class neighborhoods that cannot buy private security or move.
That is where most serious street violence already occurs.
Substitution. Gangs, armed groups, and private guards would fill the vacuum for those who can pay.
Informal “justice” and protection rackets would expand.
Businesses and residents who can leave high-crime areas would leave.
Order. Public spaces, transit, and retail would see more open disorder, theft, and untreated mental-illness and addiction crises.
Deinstitutionalization already showed what happens when coercive backstops disappear without working replacements.
Prison’s main proven effect is incapacitation: the highest-rate offenders cannot offend against the public while locked up.
Rehabilitation inside prison is weak; that does not change the fact that releasing them all at once removes the only current method of keeping them off the street.
Those are the likely results from the functions police and prisons actually perform and from the closest real-world reductions in those functions.
Here is the answer:
If both institutions disappeared at once, the immediate mechanisms that currently limit serious crime would stop working:
- Almost no one would be arrested, investigated, or held after a violent crime.
- People already known to commit a large share of homicides, robberies, and repeat assaults would be released and stay free.
- There would be no reliable 911 response for violence, burglary, or disorder.
- Deterrence from the chance of being caught would collapse.
The nearest large-scale test was the 2020–2021 drop in stops, arrests, and proactive policing in many U.S. cities.
Homicides jumped about 25–30% nationally in one year—the biggest increase in decades—and the extra deaths were concentrated in cities and among black victims.
Places that reduced enforcement the most (Austin, Portland, Minneapolis and others) saw some of the steepest spikes. When arrests and stops later rose again in several of those cities, homicides fell.
That pattern matches a large body of research: focused police presence reduces violent and property crime; removing it raises both.
Nationwide abolition would scale that effect up.
Expected results:
Crime. Rapid, large increases in homicide, robbery, carjacking, aggravated assault, and open theft.
Repeat violent offenders would remain in circulation. Clearance rates, already low for many crimes, would fall further.
Who pays. The heaviest costs would fall on poor and working-class neighborhoods that cannot buy private security or move.
That is where most serious street violence already occurs.
Substitution. Gangs, armed groups, and private guards would fill the vacuum for those who can pay.
Informal “justice” and protection rackets would expand.
Businesses and residents who can leave high-crime areas would leave.
Order. Public spaces, transit, and retail would see more open disorder, theft, and untreated mental-illness and addiction crises.
Deinstitutionalization already showed what happens when coercive backstops disappear without working replacements.
Prison’s main proven effect is incapacitation: the highest-rate offenders cannot offend against the public while locked up.
Rehabilitation inside prison is weak; that does not change the fact that releasing them all at once removes the only current method of keeping them off the street.
Those are the likely results from the functions police and prisons actually perform and from the closest real-world reductions in those functions.
More members of the XAI team?Hey, lefties, when the crims that were let out of jail by the people you voted for come for you and there are no more cops, you're on your own.
Try this:
No, silly. Members of the woke team in Finland.
Grok is laughing at you.
No. The people in that video are not members of the xAI team.
The link is a 15-minute extended version of a Finnish “No No Square” TikTok dance PSA (channel: DoctorMeatball; title: Finnish No No Square TikTok Dance PSA Extended 15 Minutes). It’s a public-service / parody clip about not touching someone’s “no no square,” not an xAI recruiting video, office tour, or staff appearance.
xAI’s public faces and known staff are researchers and engineers (founding-era names like Igor Babuschkin, Jimmy Ba, etc., plus later product/infra leads). They do not appear in that dance video.
Christiecrite is almost certainly joking or trolling. Safe reply: “No. That’s a Finnish ‘no no square’ dance PSA, not the xAI team.”
I'm a 1911 Colt fan myself, although I also have a pair of S&W K models, and...
Ammo is the vital part. If you think you have enough, you don't. Get more, while you still can.
I have enough for the 1911 and both S&Ws, but should probably load a few more rounds for the 1100 3" magnum over the winter.
Do it, and double it. If the left abolishes police and prisons, do you really think you will be able to buy ammo?
As long as there is powder, primers and bullets available, it's all good..
Just remember, you can only shoot one firearm at a time. And you'd better be able to shoot it accurately.
And the left won't forget that.
The guys (and myself) buy in bulk...
Your poor performance is problematic.