Jean Carroll lied on the stand.

Billionaires raped her TWICE in public areas and she had a knife held to her throat and was nearly raped once according to her. She is a VERY unlucky woman. Or a wackodoodole

Or maybe the men she's encountered, so-called billionaires, are all entitled jerks who think they can grab them by the pussy and they won't care.
 
Billionaires raped her TWICE in public areas and she had a knife held to her throat and was nearly raped once according to her. She is a VERY unlucky woman. Or a wackodoodole

There's a very long list of men who supposedly violated her... I'm going with wackadoodle...
 
How sad that you so utterly lack self respect, teach. You support someone who considers women to be sperm receptacles. That's you.

Yep. She has never yet "met" a rape victim -- particularly if the rapist was a sports figure or an (R) politician -- that she believed. They were all asking for it, shouldn't have been at ____, were dressed immodestly, had alcohol, etc. etc.
 
Yep. She has never yet "met" a rape victim -- particularly if the rapist was a sports figure or an (R) politician -- that she believed. They were all asking for it, shouldn't have been at ____, were dressed immodestly, had alcohol, etc. etc.

I think teach is jealous that Trump didn't grab HER by the pussy. He can't assault EVERY woman, for pete's sake. He's only human.
 
Carroll said under oath that Trump raped her. The jury said that never happened. So she lied on the stand. Trump told the truth. This is going to get appealed by Trump. How can he defame her by saying he did not rape her. In fact she defamed him by calling him a rapist.

I’m pretty certain I wasn’t the first one, but I just emailed Trump’s office (www.45office.com) suggesting he countersue her for defamation, and ask for 5 million and one dollars. This shit has to stop. I don’t know exactly what the political implications would be, but I do know it does nothing but piss off the right and harden their resolve, and there isn’t one leftard that’s thinking “honor and balance is restored. I can now confidently vote for Trump because he is obviously better for the sake of the country”

Stupid jackass shit like this sucks all the oxygen out of the room. We can’t keep focusing on this to the exclusion of everything else, that is actually being exacerbated by the senile maniac in charge.
 
I’m pretty certain I wasn’t the first one, but I just emailed Trump’s office (www.45office.com) suggesting he countersue her for defamation, and ask for 5 million and one dollars. This shit has to stop. I don’t know exactly what the political implications would be, but I do know it does nothing but piss off the right and harden their resolve, and there isn’t one leftard that’s thinking “honor and balance is restored. I can now confidently vote for Trump because he is obviously better for the sake of the country”

Stupid jackass shit like this sucks all the oxygen out of the room. We can’t keep focusing on this to the exclusion of everything else, that is actually being exacerbated by the senile maniac in charge.
Yeah he should file the suit in West Virginia or somewhere that he can get at least %50 Republican jury.
 
Or year. I guess she is raped so often that it is hard to remember when it happens.

She's a whackadoodle... and a bad person.. who gives away their cat... and calls their second husband inappropriate names and then dumps him.. who knows what other weirdo things she's done but there's a long list of guys she's angry at so they better buckle up if they're still alive...
 
Carroll said under oath that Trump raped her. The jury said that never happened. So she lied on the stand. Trump told the truth. This is going to get appealed by Trump. How can he defame her by saying he did not rape her. In fact she defamed him by calling him a rapist.

Sigh. How do you pack so much stupid into such a short post?

The jury did not say Trump never raped Carroll.

Trump never said anything at the trial. He didn't even show up. He didn't present a defense. And now he's posting to you brain dead cultists that the trial in which he chose to have no part was "unfair". And you suck on his pea-sized balls and repeat him like he's right. What a life.
 
A fucking NY jury...what did you expect?

I just want to make sure I understand your premise. There can be no fair jury for a person of one political persuasion in a legal jurisdiction that favors a different political persuasion.

Is that what you're claiming, you whiny, little bitch? Think about the implications of that abjectly stupid claim.
 
Back
Top