Jim Jordan rips Dems Star witness to shreds!

Never underestimate the stupidity of the Leftists. :thup:

I am willing to make the prediction now, with 99% confidence, that Pelosi will not hold an impeachment vote over the phone call for the following reasons ...

1. A Senate trial will be fair
2. The Senate will not convict.
3. A trial will remove 6 dem senators from the campaign trail.
4. A dem failure to remove the president is a major victory for Trump
5. A dem failure to convict will all but guarantee Turmp's reelection.
6. A fair trial will expose the Deep State coup players.
7. It will put at risk 20 dem congressional seats held in districts that Trump won.
You don't really think this is about Ukraine only? This venue gives the House much more leeway to investigate those issues that Mueller advised they dig into.

As the weeks pass, we're going to see myriad crimes come to the fore. Especially when Stone goes down.
 
I am thinking the Democrats are smart enough to know they can not possibly oust Trump from office,

so maybe we should focus conversation to what they may be trying to accomplish, would make more sense

They can do both, and they know Trump's lackeys in the Senate aren't going to convict him, this is for the American public, exposing Trump as the autocrat he wants to become, plus, if the case is made, it is going to put a whole lot of GOP Senators up for reelection next year on the bubble
 
Jordan was supposed to tear apart people who had a 5o year experience in serving the nation. He was, as usual, way over his head. He is a showman. He takes off his jacket and gets down to work, work he is not qualified to do. He is bad at it. Just noise, signifying nothing. But bombast works on the rightys. It is what they get from Fox ,Beck, and Infowars.
Teabaggers gonna teabag.
 
Jordan ripped the scab off the pretense of all this hearsay as being truer testimony.
Then that other idiot Dem was yammering on and on about "hearsay being better evidence"...what idiots say this noise..

Yesterday was a disaster for the Dems. The Diplo-dweebs were shown to care more about Ukraine funding then supporting POTUS (Constitutional order)

It's all going down hill from here for Schiff
 
Which is why they brought him on. Because Nunes' delusional content evidently isn't enough to cloud the issues.

Jesus, I was laughing out loud at Nunes’ pathetic opening statement. It could have been Trump sitting there with his lying bullshit.
 
You mention masturbation a lot, maybe you should have that looked at, he embarrassed your entire party! You will continue to vote for them and remain on the urban plantation for life, it's cool, you are vested in the welfare state, it's what I expect! Open your eyes, and see the democrat party simply moved the plantation, and turned heavy labo,r into no labor for scraps!
Masturbation ties into Jordan's past, and impending lawsuits
 
Of course there was. They thought that having Biden on their payroll would help with dealings in the U.S.. It didn't really do them any good, as they already paid back unpaid taxes after finally being prosecuted for trump like crimes. Biden came well after the fact.

Thanks for admitting it was a corrupt unethical payoff. :thup:
 
Excellent!

Which is why Pelosi will never hold an impeachment vote about the phone call.

I'll be surprised if a vote is done, unless she knows that they don't have the votes and then it's just for show; because if this goes to the Senate, they can then issue their own subpoenas and I believe that the DNC wants certain information to not become public.
 
You don't really think this is about Ukraine only? This venue gives the House much more leeway to investigate those issues that Mueller advised they dig into.

As the weeks pass, we're going to see myriad crimes come to the fore. Especially when Stone goes down.

Nonsensical babbling liberal :palm:
 
For the same reason Trump’s kids enrich themselves because of his position

Fucking hypocrite.
The glaring difference being that the trump klan makes foreign policy based on their own personal gain. Biden was carrying out U.S policy when he demanded the ouster of the corrupt prosecutor who refused to investigate Burisma.
 
I'll be surprised if a vote is done, unless she knows that they don't have the votes and then it's just for show; because if this goes to the Senate, they can then issue their own subpoenas and I believe that the DNC wants certain information to not become public.

You are joking right?

Who in the hell do you think the DNC doesn't want subpoenaed?

You got to turn off Hannity and get out more, a lot more
 
Emails Reveal Biden/Burisma Influence at State Department
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archi...den-burisma-influence-at-state-department.php

John Solomon has posted State Department emails involving a lobbyist named Karen Tramontano and Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas company that paid Hunter Biden $3 million:

Hunter Biden and his Ukrainian gas firm colleagues had multiple contacts with the Obama State Department during the 2016 election cycle, including one just a month before Vice President Joe Biden forced Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his son’s company for corruption, newly released memos show.

During that February 2016 contact, a U.S. representative for Burisma Holdings sought a meeting with Undersecretary of State Catherine A. Novelli to discuss ending the corruption allegations against the Ukrainian firm where Hunter Biden worked as a board member, according to memos obtained under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. …
***
Hunter Biden’s name, in fact, was specifically invoked by the Burisma representative as a reason the State Department should help, according to a series of email exchanges among U.S. officials trying to arrange the meeting.
 
He's right. They wanted access to the highest levels of the U.S govt.

Unfortunately, they got nothing like that in the end. Biden was hired as a lawyer/consultant for Burisma. They got counsel. He got a salary. Quid pro quo.
 
Back
Top