There is no evidence that Trump's guilty verdict was political. There is a ruling grounded in legal reasoning. Trump broke the law and was assigned his due consequences. That's the way the system is supposed to work.
If some investors want to react to the verdict by relocating, then that decision is political. The cult has proven itself eager to commit suicide for their messiah.
The ones choosing to leave due to this decision, based on a betting line, would be most likely to be the ones committing fraud themselves and now fearful of a Sheriff who is going to enforce the law.
On the flip side, new businesses are locating and opening in NYS in mass numbers every day too, and those ones would be more likely to be attracted to a market that has good fraud laws, consistently enforced.
Magats will never understand that Fraud is a thing business fear more than any other thing, as it is so hard to control. While yes, companies do a lot of their own diligence, generally by looking at publically available data to see if declarations make sense, that does not mean the companies are doing forensic level investigations of each and every claim, as they cannot. Reliance on signed statement, is also key. And that can generally be trusted as the penalty for giving fraudulent statements (fines and jail) is so high, few companies will do it.
So in this example, if Trump states he has fully developed 7 Springs with 7 estate mansions on the property paid for, and the property is worth ~$300MM, when in fact none of that development is done, the typical bank diligence is to look at public records of land in that area, with other mansions on it, and see if Trump is giving a comparable good value.
What banks do not expect and typical diligence will not catch, is when Trump forges fraudulent documents, as he did, saying the land is fully developed already because so few businesses are willing to commit such blatant documents fraud, in the way Trump did regularly.