Karmelo Anthony was serving an active suspension from his school

T. A. Gardner said:
A reasonable person would have left the tent. What reasonable person would stand their ground for no valid reason when outnumbered and those opposing them are getting increasingly hostile?
Click to expand...
I agree, if a gang of teens attacks you, the reasonable thing to do is not stand your ground. Texas law makers see things differently.

T. A. Gardner said:
Stand your ground applies to situations where you have a reasonable reason to remain where you are.
Click to expand...
No, no, no, no, no... There is no place in the law for reasonable. The obligation to retreat is reasonable, but that is not the law in Texas.

T. A. Gardner said:
he was clearly somewhere he shouldn't have been
Click to expand...
And yet not a single adult in authority agreed? Why was that?

T. A. Gardner said:
For what reason was Anthony in that tent to begin with? Don't say it's his "right" to be there or some nonsense. Give us some rational reason for his presence in the tent.
Click to expand...
He wanted to avoid the rain. He sat there quietly not getting wet.

What sort of school has random kids enforcing rules?
 
Walt said:
I agree, if a gang of teens attacks you, the reasonable thing to do is not stand your ground. Texas law makers see things differently.
Click to expand...

No "gang of teens" "attacked" Anthony.

Walt said:
No, no, no, no, no... There is no place in the law for reasonable. The obligation to retreat is reasonable, but that is not the law in Texas.
Click to expand...

Who told you that?

Walt said:
And yet not a single adult in authority agreed? Why was that?
Click to expand...

Who are these alleged adults in authority?

Walt said:
He wanted to avoid the rain. He sat there quietly not getting wet.
Click to expand...

Is that so?

Walt said:
What sort of school has random kids enforcing rules?
Click to expand...

None, that I know of.
 
Walt said:
Teachers, security, coaches, principles, etc. I know Metcalf believed he owned the school. He did not. He had absolutely no authority.
Click to expand...

1780864147992.png

1780864221777.png


Enforcing Boundaries: Protecting the tent space so uninvited people from other teams do not take over the area. [1]

Did u get that part

As team captain ...He had the right to ask him to leave and more than one person has testified KA was ask around 15 times to leave and he didn't he just screamed make me pussies and touch me see what happens. And after all that provoking when someone who was unarmed touched KA he pulled his weapon and killed Austin...Ran away and pitched his weapon!!

And you want to defend this POS
 
Last edited:
Walt said:
I agree, if a gang of teens attacks you, the reasonable thing to do is not stand your ground. Texas law makers see things differently.


No, no, no, no, no... There is no place in the law for reasonable. The obligation to retreat is reasonable, but that is not the law in Texas.
Click to expand...

There is nothing in Texas law that requires you to stand your ground. That is an imbecilic position. You can if you must, but it isn't as if you have to regardless. Anthony could have left the tent. He had no reason to be there to begin with. He got nothing positive out of staying. He forced the situation rather than tried to defuse it.

Aside from that, it is NOT disputed that after stabbing Metcalf, Anthony fled the scene. He did not, "stand his ground," he ran away.
Walt said:
And yet not a single adult in authority agreed? Why was that?
Click to expand...

What "adult in authority" would that be?
Walt said:
He wanted to avoid the rain. He sat there quietly not getting wet.
Click to expand...

No, he didn't. He was asked to leave and got confrontational. Anthony, rather than trying to defuse the situation by saying something like "It's raining I'll just stand / sit here," chose to confront Metcalf and the others present with veiled threats. Anthony also deliberately armed himself.
Walt said:
What sort of school has random kids enforcing rules?
Click to expand...
As far as I can tell, only students were present in the tent.
 
Poor Salty Walty.

Under Texas Rules of Evidence and self-defense law, a person cannot claim self-defense if they intentionally provoked the difficulty. The prosecution emphasizes that Anthony brought a 3.5-inch folding knife onto school property, kept his hand hidden inside his backpack on the blade, and dared the students to touch him. They argue he deliberately manufactured the confrontation and used lethal force against an unarmed peer who was merely trying to defend his team's space.
 
So for the murderers Negro supporters when he's convicted do your rioting and looting cause its the way you deal with everything is by using violence !! That's what this kid was taught and now he's going to have to pay for it !!! So quit playing the victim !! The only victim is the dead boy !! And by the way using the gofundme money to buy a house and new cars just shows were their priorities are !!!
 
Last edited:
volsrocks said:
So for the murderers Negro supporters when he's convicted do your rioting and looting cause its the way you deal with everything is by using violence !! That's what this kid was taught and now he's going to have to pay for it !!! So quit playing the victim !! The only victim is the dead boy !! And by the way using the gofundme money to buy a house and new cars just shows were their priorities are !!!
Click to expand...


The claim that Texas teenager Karmelo Anthony or his family "blew" their online legal defense donations to purchase luxury cars and a house is unsupported by factual records. Sworn testimony, platform statements, and primary court records demonstrate that the family did not purchase a home, but rather relocated to a rental house for safety, and the defense funds have been explicitly designated for legal fees, security, and immediate living expenses while under strict judicial constraints.

The financial foundation consists of over $412,000 to $600,000 raised via online crowdfunding platforms (principally GiveSendGo).

GiveSendGo co-founder Jacob Wells confirmed that the platform maintained active communication with the Anthony family regarding fund oversight.

During bond hearings, the defendant's father, Andrew Anthony, testified under oath: "We don't have access to the money." This refers to the standard operational delays and staggered payouts utilized by platforms managing high-risk, high-volume donations to ensure compliance and avoid immediate fraud.

Sensationalized headlines from outlets like the New York Post reported that Anthony was "living with family in a $900K home" and had "bought a new car" immediately following his release. Comparing this framing directly with court transcripts and attorney statements isolates the known facts.
 
Gee, a crime is committed and the perpetrator is a black man. And he got nailed and is going to stand trial. The Justice at work as it should be.

And our pointy hooded palooka Vole is right on it like a tick on a pig's ass.

And yet, this sheet wearing schmuck has NO problem with the following:

www.newrepublic.com/post/202993/convicted-child-sex-predator-avoids-prison-thanks-trump-pardon


www.newsweek.com/list-of-donald-trump-pardon-recipients-charged-with-new-crimes-11088352


Can you say "hypocrite", boys and girls? Sure you can .... I knew you could. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top