Really. (I'm still wondering why Republicans AREN'T interested in Trump's sex life, baffling)
Ken Starr's Report had NO "MAYBEs" or "MIGHT HAVEs". It was CLEAR
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Really. (I'm still wondering why Republicans AREN'T interested in Trump's sex life, baffling)
He isn't LYING UNDER OATH about it. No one gave a CRAP about anything else regarding Sleazeball Bill's either.
(I'm wondering why Crime-o-crats AREN'T interested in the lying in the FISA court(s). )
DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO DODGE THE EMBARRASSING (for you and yours) POINT OF THE THREADM DULY-NOTED.
Ken Starr's CONCISE REPORT GIVES LIE TO "Sour-Grapes-Over-the FBI-Job"MUELLER's "COMMENTS"....BIGTIME.
It’s been all over the tabloids for years, at least those parts Trump wanted to release.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Mason Michaels
Verified User
And the Civil War wasn't about slavery!
Or gave any.
Wrong, retard
PLease find the words "BLOW JOB" in here ANYWHERE, or in the actual Articles of Impeachment adopted AFTER Starr SPECIFICALLY CITED THESE NUMEROUS CRIMES...or keep lying to yourself:
The Starr report cited 11 specific possible grounds for impeachment in four categories: five counts of lying under oath, four counts of obstruction of justice, one count of witness tampering and one count of abuse of constitutional authority. All of which arose from his liaison with Ms. Lewinsky and not from the Whitewater land deal and other matters Starr investigated. [8]
The outlined eleven possible grounds for impeachment allegedly committed by President Bill Clinton were given in the Introduction of the report as:
"1. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil case when he denied a sexual affair, a sexual relationship, or sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky.
2. President Clinton lied under oath to the grand jury about his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky.
3. In his civil deposition, to support his false statement about the sexual relationship, President Clinton also lied under oath about being alone with Ms. Lewinsky and about the many gifts exchanged between Ms. Lewinsky and him.
4. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil deposition about his discussions with Ms. Lewinsky concerning her involvement in the Jones case.
5. During the Jones case, the President obstructed justice and had an understanding with Ms. Lewinsky to jointly conceal the truth about their relationship by concealing gifts subpoenaed by Ms. Jones's attorneys.
6. During the Jones case, the President obstructed justice and had an understanding with Ms. Lewinsky to jointly conceal the truth of their relationship from the judicial process by a scheme that included the following means: (i) Both the President and Ms. Lewinsky understood that they would lie under oath in the Jones case about their sexual relationship; (ii) the President suggested to Ms. Lewinsky that she prepare an affidavit that, for the President's purposes, would memorialize her testimony under oath and could be used to prevent questioning of both of them about their relationship; (iii) Ms. Lewinsky signed and filed the false affidavit; (iv) the President used Ms. Lewinsky's false affidavit at his deposition in an attempt to head off questions about Ms. Lewinsky; and (v) when that failed, the President lied under oath at his civil deposition about the relationship with Ms. Lewinsky.
7. President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice by helping Ms. Lewinsky obtain a job in New York at a time when she would have been a witness harmful to him were she to tell the truth in the Jones case.
8. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil deposition about his discussions with Vernon Jordan concerning Ms. Lewinsky's involvement in the Jones case.
9. The President improperly tampered with a potential witness by attempting to corruptly influence the testimony of his personal secretary, Betty Currie, in the days after his civil deposition.
10. President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice during the grand jury investigation by refusing to testify for seven months and lying to senior White House aides with knowledge that they would relay the President's false statements to the grand jury -- and did thereby deceive, obstruct, and impede the grand jury.
11. President Clinton abused his constitutional authority by (i) lying to the public and the Congress in January 1998 about his relationship with Ms. Lewinsky; (ii) promising at that time to cooperate fully with the grand jury investigation; (iii) later refusing six invitations to testify voluntarily to the grand jury; (iv) invoking Executive Privilege; (v) lying to the grand jury in August 1998; and (vi) lying again to the public and Congress on August 17, 1998 -- all as part of an effort to hinder, impede, and deflect possible inquiry by the Congress of the United States."[9]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starr_Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITED ACTUAL CRIMES...NO SPECULATION...and no BULLSHIT "EXONERATION" declarations, either.
PROSECUTORS EITHER BRING/RECOOMMEND CHARGES, as STARR DID; MUELLER DID NEITHER.
Mason Michaels
Verified User
No blow job,no impeachment!
This is why inbreeding is illegal.
You are not nearly qualified to make that statement, inbred toothless idiot.
NO PERJURY, no OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE, NO IMPEACHMENT. He had been using her for MONTHS before he LIED UNDER OATH.
Were your parents arrested?
Translation: "After years of 'investigations' found no wrong-doing on the part of Bill Clinton, Republicans decided on looking into Bill's sex life as a way to Blackmail Bill into resigning".
My parents were from 2 different countries, thousands of miles apart, unlike your Uncle Dad and Aunt Mom.
Mason Michaels
Verified User
She went after him!
I seem to recall that as well.
They changed their tune when the Mullet report failed to give them their desires, didn't they?
Oh...you were in the room!!! Who knew??
IRRELVANT...his CRIMES WERE SPECIFICALLY and DEFINITELY DETAILED, NO IFs, ANDs, or BUTs.....
Starr DID NOT INDICT CLINTON...but he DID SPECIFY DEFEINITE CRIMES, not "I cannot make a determination"....