That is false. They did not try or plan to force them to remove posts.
So don't pay taxes. Live off grid.
Leftists Steal the Election in Brazil
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Yes, they did plan to do exactly that.
Disinformation Governance Board (2023)
Fighting foreign disinformation operations in America collided with fear of government control of information in the Department of Homeland Security's short-lived Disinformation Governance Board.
firstamendment.mtsu.edu
Hearing reveals scope of Biden administration censorship efforts
(The Center Square) – While Democratic lawmakers and experts said Tuesday that the Biden administration effectively facilitated a crackdown on speech it disliked, they maintained those efforts did not amount
Now you are saying that because of the government and onerous regulations and burdens I have to live like a hermit if I want to try and avoid that, which still isn't likely possible.
Where is the force? Quote them.Yes, they did plan to do exactly that.
Disinformation Governance Board (2023)
Fighting foreign disinformation operations in America collided with fear of government control of information in the Department of Homeland Security's short-lived Disinformation Governance Board.
Hearing reveals scope of Biden administration censorship efforts
(The Center Square) – While Democratic lawmakers and experts said Tuesday that the Biden administration effectively facilitated a crackdown on speech it disliked, they maintained those efforts did not amountwww.thecentersquare.com
So quit complaining about paying taxes. Move to other country.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
You're just talking out of your ass as always.
Anyone who watched Capitol security giving little mini tours to the entirely peaceful "protestors" understands that lying leftists aren't above ANY sort of hyperbole, even to the point of demonstrating that they have no idea what an insurrection is.
... because it's assumed.
Correct. You just have absolutely no idea what one is.
Too funny.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
During the Biden administration, the Department of Homeland Security coordinated with a multitude of entities to censor speech deemed “misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation,” the latter referring to information “based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate.”
The DHS particularly pushed social media platforms, including Meta, to censor speech not aligned with the administration’s views about the COVID-19 virus and vaccine, Ukraine, and Hunter Biden’s laptop, among other things.
Hearing reveals scope of Biden administration censorship efforts
(The Center Square) – While Democratic lawmakers and experts said Tuesday that the Biden administration effectively facilitated a crackdown on speech it disliked, they maintained those efforts did not amount
After the announcement of the Disinformation Governance Board, the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana sued the Joe Biden administration and other government officials in Missouri et al v. Biden et al, accusing them of coercing social media companies to suppress disfavored viewpoints and speakers.
The lawsuit cited the Disinformation Governance Board as an example of a “campaign of censorship” within the Department of Homeland Security.
Disinformation Governance Board (2023)
Fighting foreign disinformation operations in America collided with fear of government control of information in the Department of Homeland Security's short-lived Disinformation Governance Board.
firstamendment.mtsu.edu
That lawsuit was settled in favor of the plaintiffs and the Biden administration lost.
Taxes are one thing. Wealth confiscation is another. That aside, the government forcing participation in various programs is also an example of something the founders were against.
Voluntary Moderation vs. Coercion: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Twitter’s content moderation decisions were made at the company's discretion rather than through government orders, meaning Twitter was not acting as a "state actor". In subsequent court filings, Twitter's own attorneys explicitly denied that internal documents ("The Twitter Files") showed the government forced the company to censor content.During the Biden administration, the Department of Homeland Security coordinated with a multitude of entities to censor speech deemed “misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation,” the latter referring to information “based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate.”
The DHS particularly pushed social media platforms, including Meta, to censor speech not aligned with the administration’s views about the COVID-19 virus and vaccine, Ukraine, and Hunter Biden’s laptop, among other things.
Hearing reveals scope of Biden administration censorship efforts
(The Center Square) – While Democratic lawmakers and experts said Tuesday that the Biden administration effectively facilitated a crackdown on speech it disliked, they maintained those efforts did not amount
After the announcement of the Disinformation Governance Board, the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana sued the Joe Biden administration and other government officials in Missouri et al v. Biden et al, accusing them of coercing social media companies to suppress disfavored viewpoints and speakers.
The lawsuit cited the Disinformation Governance Board as an example of a “campaign of censorship” within the Department of Homeland Security.
Disinformation Governance Board (2023)
Fighting foreign disinformation operations in America collided with fear of government control of information in the Department of Homeland Security's short-lived Disinformation Governance Board.
That lawsuit was settled in favor of the plaintiffs and the Biden administration lost.
Taxes are one thing. Wealth confiscation is another. That aside, the government forcing participation in various programs is also an example of something the founders were against.
Sorry buddy.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
The 5th Circuit Agrees That Federal Officials Unconstitutionally'Coerced' or 'Encouraged' Online Censorship
Seems both Congress and the Supreme Court find otherwise. And, I used original documents, not some CNN news article.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Aaaaah, there's that leftist penchant for pretending to speak for countless others.
The correct answer is "Just you."
And yet Elon's own lawyers said it didn't happen.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Actually, the did say it happened.
X will now tell users when governments have forced it to limit their posts | TechCrunch
X is expanding its “Under the Hood” transparency tool to show when posts have been downranked or withheld in response to local laws and government demands, including which country made the request.
techcrunch.com
Paywall.
Did you even read the article? It talks about Republicans.
That is now. Not under Biden Administration.X will now tell users when governments have forced it to limit their posts | TechCrunch
X is expanding its “Under the Hood” transparency tool to show when posts have been downranked or withheld in response to local laws and government demands, including which country made the request.
So that is what you are calling slamming a fire extinguisher into a police officers face?
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
First, show me video of that happening.
Nomad
Verified User
Amazing how truthful even a shameless, lying piece of MAGA trash like you can be if you just try.
Feels good to get that off your chest, doesn't it?
Or rather, what little chest you have, I should say.
Yep. That's generally assumed about you and it's based on the ample level of evidence you've supplied.
That's where you're dead wrong.
I know all too well what a childish troll who only engages in juvenile playground banter you are.
Not sure I'd describe it as "funny" in the same sense of the word that you do...
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Quite the pivot to irrelevance.
There were several people convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of slamming fire extinguishers against Capitol Police officers heads, two of which were:
• Robert Sanford: A retired firefighter from Boothwyn, Pennsylvania, who was filmed throwing a fire extinguisher that struck three police officers in the head on the Lower West Terrace. He pleaded guilty to assaulting, resisting, or impeding police officers using a dangerous weapon and was sentenced to 52 months (4 years and 4 months) in federal prison followed by three years of supervised release.
• Robert Scott Palmer: A Florida resident who sprayed the contents of a fire extinguisher at a line of officers and then threw the empty canister at them. He pleaded guilty to assaulting law enforcement officers with a dangerous weapon and was sentenced to 63 months (5 years and 3 months) in prison.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
The videos show otherwise. Both threw small, empty fire extinguishers, neither of which hit anyone. Those individuals were railroaded in unfair trials for crimes they didn't commit.
Watch the videos you posted.
Into the Night
Contributor
He didn't.
Into the Night
Contributor
Fiction.
stephenPE
Verified User
Ok lets go really slow. Like you. Democrats were the Jan 6th terrorists according to you. 1500 were pardoned. So which is it. I know parrots can repeat what people say but obviously not process information......I think I'm about done arguing with people that can look at video and see violence and deny it. And say the violent were Dems and but they were not pardoned............I may as well find a two year old to argue about cookies and Bluie.......