LGBTQ rights in Russia

Scott said:
Can we agree that they deserved the same civil rights enjoyed by whites? That's what the civil rights movement was about, by the way. Quoting from Wikipedia's page on the matter:
**
The civil rights movement was a social movement in the United States from 1954 to 1968 which aimed to abolish legalized racial segregation, discrimination, and disenfranchisement in the country, which most commonly affected African Americans. The movement had origins in the Reconstruction era in the late 19th century, and modern roots in the 1940s After years of nonviolent protests and civil disobedience campaigns, the civil rights movement achieved many of its legislative goals in the 1960s, during which it secured new protections in federal law for the civil rights of all Americans.
**

Source:
en.wikipedia.org

Civil rights movement - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
No they deserved the same rights.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It doesn't get anywhere near what LGBTPDQRSTUV sex parades often turn into. Those are far more about drinking and partying in general than just raw sexuality.
Click to expand...
More than Mardi Gras and Spring Break. You are quickly moving up in the ranks as the dumbest dumb fuck and biggest intentional liar on JPP.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Okay, so someone has usurped the idea. They also have that sort of parade in Asia where there's lots of open prostitution and such like the Philippines or Thailand.
Click to expand...
"Oh ok, I lied. Let's move on like it didn't happen." Fuck you, Terry.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Exactly. What that community does in private is their business and none of mine. When it's in public and in my face, problem.
Click to expand...
You don't want to see the parade, you raging fucking pussy? Then stay away from it. I don't enjoy driving around an entire metroplex to avoid sports traffic, but I don't cry about it like you do. Grow a fucking dick.
 
Scott said:
I'm going to stop you right there, because I now see that we have a larger problem than whether or not "eternal victimhood" exists. The larger problem in question in our conversation above is what you refer to as "they" here, and the "LGBTQIAXXX..." elsewhere. Put simply, it doesn't exist. The closest thing to it would be the LGBTQ community, but as I mentioned elsewhere, the only thing that unites all members is the fact that they're -in- said community. You seem to be claiming that they all share this "eternal victimhood" you speak of, but I've yet to see any evidence that this is the case.
Click to expand...
That's EXACTLY what they display. Victimhood. It is used to try to justify preferential treatment.

But it is sexual deviancy nonetheless.
 
Diesel said:
You don't want to see the parade, you raging fucking pussy? Then stay away from it. I don't enjoy driving around an entire metroplex to avoid sports traffic, but I don't cry about it like you do. Grow a fucking dick.
Click to expand...
So you are telling people to leave their homes and businesses along the parade route to satisfy someone's lust for sexual deviancy to be displayed?
 
IBDaMann said:
Thank you. That was my point.


I apologize. I should have written "LGBTQQIAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX+" and not omitted the many space-holders. That was insensitive of me.
Click to expand...
I suspect that you're still being insensitive by omitting way too many space-holders.

But then again, you ARE limited to a certain number of characters per post (as far as I am aware). I won't hold you accountable for that which cannot be fit into a single JPP post.
 
Scott said:
The closest thing to it would be the LGBTQ community,
Click to expand...
@IBDaMann I have, just now, added a couple more entries into my Lispy Leftist List. One is "gay community (lesbian community, etc)" and the other is "LGBT community (LGBTQ community, LGBTQ+ community, etc).

@Scott While IBDaMann seems to be insistent upon differentiating between movements and people (for good reason, imo), you seem to be insistent upon denying the existence of any "LGBTQ movement" and wish to solely focus upon people.

LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer) is a movement. While there are people who identify themselves as being "lesbian", "gay", etc (myself NOT included), LGBTQ in and of itself is not people but is rather a movement (with the goal of achieving and retaining supremacy for its "card carrying members"). Not all such people are involved with or associate themselves with the movement. Some of those people instead choose to remain distant from the movement; some even outright oppose the movement. Unfortunately for them (e.g. Scott Pressler), they do NOT receive the same "card carrying member" benefits.

I'm sure you've noticed that Scott Pressler doesn't receive the same benefits/treatment from the LGBTQ movement than, say, Richard ("Rachel") Levine does, right...??
 
gfm7175 said:
@IBDaMann I have, just now, added a couple more entries into my Lispy Leftist List. One is "gay community (lesbian community, etc)" and the other is "LGBT community (LGBTQ community, LGBTQ+ community, etc).

@Scott While IBDaMann seems to be insistent upon differentiating between movements and people (for good reason, imo), you seem to be insistent upon denying the existence of any "LGBTQ movement" and wish to solely focus upon people.

LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer) is a movement. While there are people who identify themselves as being "lesbian", "gay", etc (myself NOT included), LGBTQ in and of itself is not people but is rather a movement (with the goal of achieving and retaining supremacy for its "card carrying members"). Not all such people are involved with or associate themselves with the movement. Some of those people instead choose to remain distant from the movement; some even outright oppose the movement. Unfortunately for them (e.g. Scott Pressler), they do NOT receive the same "card carrying member" benefits.

I'm sure you've noticed that Scott Pressler doesn't receive the same benefits/treatment from the LGBTQ movement than, say, Richard ("Rachel") Levine does, right...??
Click to expand...
Redefinition fallacy. You do not get to say that a group of people is a movement. Your so called movement is based on a few bad apples.
 
gfm7175 said:
@IBDaMann I have, just now, added a couple more entries into my Lispy Leftist List. One is "gay community (lesbian community, etc)" and the other is "LGBT community (LGBTQ community, LGBTQ+ community, etc).

@Scott While IBDaMann seems to be insistent upon differentiating between movements and people (for good reason, imo), you seem to be insistent upon denying the existence of any "LGBTQ movement" and wish to solely focus upon people.

LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer) is a movement. While there are people who identify themselves as being "lesbian", "gay", etc (myself NOT included), LGBTQ in and of itself is not people but is rather a movement (with the goal of achieving and retaining supremacy for its "card carrying members"). Not all such people are involved with or associate themselves with the movement. Some of those people instead choose to remain distant from the movement; some even outright oppose the movement. Unfortunately for them (e.g. Scott Pressler), they do NOT receive the same "card carrying member" benefits.

I'm sure you've noticed that Scott Pressler doesn't receive the same benefits/treatment from the LGBTQ movement than, say, Richard ("Rachel") Levine does, right...??
Click to expand...
yeah.

and the 'gays against groomers' group have been ousted by the greater movement.

because the main goal is total evil.

pedophilia and infant rape are part of mk-ultra satanic abuse.

it splits the mind and makes people psychotic and malleable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top