Longest audit in history

[Into the Night]

Given the chronology of the posts proving that YOU can't debate the content of the OP worth a damn makes your latest claim a joke in and of itself.

Sorry sweetheart, but you can't dodge or detour your way out of this....you just don't have the intellectual courage or honesty to acknowledge that Dump has (once again) lied to you. Pathetic.

There are no debates on JPP. Only conversations. It is YOU making the fallacies. It is YOU lying about what Trump said and did. Inversion fallacies.

 

[Into the Night]

To date, none of the right wing wonks sputtering and fuming here have the cojones to admit that Dump lied to them about not releasing his tax returns because he was being "audited". They try to dismiss or deny the existence of Dump's dubious relationship with the IRS, or his current dealings with NYS.

Once I've reduced these cretins to babbling nonsense, attempting goal post moving or just outright denial of historical fax, I dump them in the IA. What's left here are 2 clowns cut from the same cloth snipping at each other....but neither can cop the aforementioned reality of their lying leader. Fascinating, but ultimately boring.

Irrelevance fallacies. Fixation. No argument presented. Trump is not required to publish tax returns.

 

[Into the Night]

Projecting again.

Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy.

Look sweetheart, if you're so pathetic that you can't acknowledge a lie from your orange faced leader on a forum that's anonymous as this then it's pointless to continue with you. So are you saying the OP is wrong and Dump didn't lie? Either shyte or get off the pot!

Void argument fallacy. RQAA. Yes. He is saying the OP is wrong. So am I.

 

[Into the Night]

Trump was married to a Russian woman, his children are half Russian, how could he not as a world class businessman somehow end up doing business with Russians?

it is not illegal to do business with the Russians, dumbass.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, he does.

No. Trump does not have to publish his tax returns.

For the last 50 years every person running showed theirs.

Irrelevance fallacy.

It was an accepted procedure by every person who respected the process

Irrelevance fallacy.

Is it a law? Nope. But norms have a lot more weight behind them than Trump's whims.

'Norms' or traditions have no weight at all. Irrelevance fallacy.

Trump also said he would do it.

He is allowed to change his mind, and he did.

Does his word mean nothing to you rightys?

Not a contract. Not a law. You are making it out to be both. Redefinition fallacies.

 

[Into the Night]

Try reading the links contents, then do something unusual for dimwitted right wing wonks...FOLLOW THE NEWS BY READING OTHER SOURCES THAN THE ONES THAT TELL YOU WHAT TO WANT TO HEAR.

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Inversion fallacy. Fiction and fallacies is not news. Redefinition fallacies.

Let me throw you a bone.....Dump's lawyer's are very good at stalling with appeals! But if pay attention, you'll note time is running out. Dump is just secure that the info won't come out until after the election (because he's positive he'll get re-elected). Got it now, genius?

Void argument fallacy.

*Oh, and if you're going to mock me,

He is not mocking you. Fallacy fallacy.

at least get up to speed with what's going on in the world

He is. Propaganda is not news. Redefinition fallacy. False authority fallacy.

(some intellectual honesty on your part wouldn't hurt either).

Void argument fallacy.

No argument presented. Inversions. Redefinitions. False authorities.

 

[Into the Night]

Trump chumps don't care.....they believe dump will keep "those people" from "winning" and "taking over". Given this, Dump could crap on the steps of St. Patrick's Cathedral and there would be a hefty percentage of Dump's supporters would STILL support him.

Speculation fallacy Speaking for others.

 

[Legion]

Trump is the most honest politician to come down the pike in a long while.

That's why they hate him, I suspect,

 

[Into the Night]

WTF are you babbling about?

He already answered that question. RQAA.

What the OP states are matters of FACT & HISTORY. Period.

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Redefinition fallacies. Buzzword fallacies. Invalid proof by circular argument.

If you can prove otherwise, please do so for the reading audience.

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.

Otherwise, you come off as some idiot denying reality.

Buzzword fallacy. Define 'reality'.

Note I've completed the original post that you stupidly thought you could edit to fit your blather.

Strawman fallacy. Irrelevance fallacy.

Get your act together son...don't wastes the readers time repeating your BS.

Bulverism fallacy.

If you can't muster the courage to admit Dump lied to you, then you're essentially useless in a rational, logical, fact based debate.

You deny logic. You don't know what 'fact' means. False equivocation fallacy (opinion<->law, opinion<->contract). Redefinition fallacy (conversation<->debate, fallacies<->debate).

No argument presented. Fundamentalism. Speaking for others. Buzzwords. Redefinitions. Bulverism. Try English. It works better.

 

[Arks&sparka]

WTF are you babbling about? What the OP states are matters of FACT & HISTORY. Period.

Proof?

If you can prove otherwise, please do so for the reading audience. Otherwise, you come off as some idiot denying reality.

you're the one claiming something as fact the burden of proof is therefore on you so get cracking.

 

[Into the Night]

translation: another intellectually impotent and dishonest right wing wonk who can't concede a simple, direct point.

He made his direct point. It is you that cannot concede it. Inversion fallacy. Your OP is based on attempting to prove a circular argument and bulverism, both fallacies.

So are you saying the OP is wrong and Dump didn't lie? Either shyte or get off the pot!

RQAA. He has already answered this question.

Assumption of victory fallacy. Fundamentalism. RQAA. Inversions. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

Keep telling yourself that, bunky:

...deleted Holy Link...

Bulverism fallacy. False authority fallacy. Cut and paste (spamming).

 

[Into the Night]

That's why they hate him, I suspect,

That is exactly why they hate Trump. He is not only the most honest politician in long while, he is very effective at his job.

 

[ExpressLane]

The Orange Oaf in the White House stated in his first year that he would present his tax returns for public examination like his predecessors as soon as an audit of his national and international businesses was complete.

That was 3 years ago. Here's where it stands now: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/01/nyregion/trump-taxes-vance-lawsuit.html


Just another thing for the MAGA hat wearers to make excuses for and deny reality.

No he said AFTER his audit was completed 2025 would be after the audit was completed

 

[Hawkeye10]

That's why they hate him, I suspect,

No, they hate him because he can not be controlled, he instinctively refuses to do as he is told, if someone tells him he has to do something he asks why, and very well might do the opposite.

 

[Arks&sparka]

WTF are you babbling about?

if what I'm saying is babble why are you even responding to it? How do you argue against babble?

You claim it's a fact I asked you to prove it you fail to. the only thing you need to respond with is establishing it as a fact.

Anything other than that is you admitting it's not a fact.

 

[canceled.2021.3]

OP just took major fisting

NYT shows Trump is in fact under audit and ZERO Russian ties

 

[Taichiliberal]

Q

uote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
WTF are you babbling about? What the OP states are matters of FACT & HISTORY. Period.

Proof?

If you can prove otherwise, please do so for the reading audience. Otherwise, you come off as some idiot denying reality.

you're the one claiming something as fact the burden of proof is therefore on you so get cracking.

Proof? Pick up a freaking newspaper, for God's sake! Or maybe the link in the OP? Your willful ignorance is astounding, to say the least. This has been going on since last year. Here's a clue https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/15/politics/donald-trump-taxes-tax-returns/index.html

Now, go turn on a news channel on the TV or radio and listen to the latest regarding your orange god and his financial finagling. I get tired of doing homework for right wing BS artists.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
WTF are you babbling about?

if what I'm saying is babble why are you even responding to it? How do you argue against babble?

You claim it's a fact I asked you to prove it you fail to. the only thing you need to respond with is establishing it as a fact.

Anything other than that is you admitting it's not a fact.

It's not an argument when you ask a question, genius. Here's how I respond to your stall tactic (if you're honestly this clueless on current events, then I can't help you or won't waste more time on you). https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ongest-audit-in-history&p=3934713#post3934713

 

[Taichiliberal]

No he said AFTER his audit was completed 2025 would be after the audit was completed