Lying Weasel Fauci's Infatuation with Fame, While People were Dying

WCM said:
Trying to get medical information about vax injuries and miscarriages/fertility problems is like getting blood from a stone.

The official statements acknowledging vax injuries and deaths lagged so badly that even behind first-hand knowledge came first, which is really unfathomable if you think about it...

The number of people that I personally know is just a fraction of a percent of the people in Canada, so our government should have been aware of tens of thousands of people who were injured by the jabs before I knew 2, and knew second-hand of others, but that's how bad it was. Then when they finally did acknowledge vax injuries, it was supposedly 1) just adolescent males that were being affected, 2) myocarditis/pericarditis was the extent of it, and 3) it was only something like 1.2 people per 100,000. That would be false, false, and false again, all by a large margin.

The two people that I know who were injured are actually both girls who were under 25 at the time. One of them is fine, but one was very badly injured by it, and is still on several heart medications to this day.

If you Google "how many Canadians were killed by the covid vaccines" it says 4 :sick:.

Now I know how blacks in Tuskeegee feel about the gov't and modern medicine.
Click to expand...
You hate science

And math

And history

And democracy
 
WCM said:
Biden sure didn't like his daughter's diary being out there lol. I'm pretty sure that's the only time in history that the FBI was sent across the country to retrieve a teenage girl's diary ffs.
Click to expand...


Showered with his preteen daughter, didn't he?
 
Plenty of coddled criminals have already identified you as a target.


Then you are an accessory to their intended crimes asshole


If you don’t report what you claim to know to the authorities it’s your crime too


Do you make a point of masturbating in public per your name?
 
evince said:
Link
Click to expand...

The link will appear at your door and it will be armed. The link will want your belongings. The link will have no use for you. There will be no police to protect you. There will be no one who will. The link will kill you.
 
Diogenes said:
The link will appear at your door and it will be armed. The link will want your belongings. The link will have no use for you. There will be no police to protect you. There will be no one who will. The link will kill you.
Click to expand...
Awe how cute this little nazi thinks he’s scaring me


Just the kind of world your intellectual hero wanted
 
zymurgy said:
Fauci voluntarily handed over his diary because he is that full of himself
Click to expand...

Is it true that "Fauci voluntarily handed over his diary because he is that full of himself"?




No. The claim is not accurate.


Anthony Fauci’s pandemic-era diary/notes (covering roughly December 2019–December 2022) were not voluntarily handed over by him. According to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., HHS officials located the materials after an approximately eight-month search across 11 separate government servers where they had been “sequestered and secreted.” HHS then provided the documents to Sens. Rand Paul and Ron Johnson as part of congressional oversight into COVID origins and the pandemic response. Paul subsequently released a large compilation (over 1,100 pages) publicly in late July 2026, ahead of Fauci’s subpoenaed Senate testimony.


Fauci had declined to appear voluntarily before Paul’s committee, which led to a subpoena. The records were treated as federal materials tied to his official duties as NIAID director (subject to retention rules and congressional access), not as purely private papers he chose to turn over. Multiple reports confirm the recovery process involved digging them out of agency systems rather than Fauci proactively providing them.


The diaries themselves do contain extensive self-focused entries about media coverage, fame, celebrity interactions, and personal observations (which critics have highlighted as self-regarding). That content is separate from how the documents entered the public domain. The “voluntarily handed over because he is full of himself” framing does not match the reported facts about their discovery and release.


grok.com

Fauci's Diary: Subpoenaed, Not Voluntary | Shared Grok Conversation

Is it true that "Fauci voluntarily handed over his diary because he is that full of himself"?
grok.com grok.com
 
evince said:
Link
Click to expand...


Did his daughter's diary say that Joe Biden showered with her when she was a preteen?




Ashley Biden’s diary—stolen around 2020, leaked by National File, and later authenticated by her in an April 2024 court letter during the sentencing of one of the people who trafficked it—contains a reflective entry (from her addiction recovery journaling around early/mid-2019) in which she discusses feeling “hyper-sexualized @ a young age” and lists possible contributing factors or memories.

One item in that list is “showers w/ my dad (probably not appropriate).”


Key points from the documented entry and verification:


  • It appears in the context of her adult self questioning possible childhood trauma (“Was I molested. I think so – I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma”) alongside other items such as early sexual experiences with friends and discomfort at certain houses.
  • The diary does not specify an exact age beyond “a young age” / childhood. “Preteen” is a reasonable inference from the phrasing and her birth year (1981), but the text itself does not pin it to a precise age like 10–12.

grok.com

Ashley Biden's Diary: Shower Reflection | Shared Grok Conversation

Did his daughter's diary say that Joe Biden showered with her when she was a preteen?
grok.com grok.com
 
So you seem pretty confident your fellow philosophical adherents will kill me and others


You better report to the FBI these plans for murdering Americans who don’t make a point of masturbating in public like your beloved crime gang
 
Diogenes said:
Did his daughter's diary say that Joe Biden showered with her when she was a preteen?




Ashley Biden’s diary—stolen around 2020, leaked by National File, and later authenticated by her in an April 2024 court letter during the sentencing of one of the people who trafficked it—contains a reflective entry (from her addiction recovery journaling around early/mid-2019) in which she discusses feeling “hyper-sexualized @ a young age” and lists possible contributing factors or memories.

One item in that list is “showers w/ my dad (probably not appropriate).”


Key points from the documented entry and verification:


  • It appears in the context of her adult self questioning possible childhood trauma (“Was I molested. I think so – I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma”) alongside other items such as early sexual experiences with friends and discomfort at certain houses.
  • The diary does not specify an exact age beyond “a young age” / childhood. “Preteen” is a reasonable inference from the phrasing and her birth year (1981), but the text itself does not pin it to a precise age like 10–12.

grok.com

Ashley Biden's Diary: Shower Reflection | Shared Grok Conversation

Did his daughter's diary say that Joe Biden showered with her when she was a preteen?
grok.com grok.com
Click to expand...
Proof of nothing


It was in the hands of untrustworthy individuals for how long?


The evidence was contaminated idiot

Rendered unusable in any court
 
evince said:
So you seem pretty confident your fellow philosophical adherents will kill me and others
Click to expand...

I am very hopeful that the criminals that your party coddles will kill you in order to take your property, Desh.

I wish I could see it, but, alas.
 
David M. Morens, a longtime senior adviser to Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), was indicted by a federal grand jury in the District of Maryland on April 16, 2026. The indictment (Case 8:26-cr-00138-PX) was unsealed around April 27–28, 2026.


Charges​


Morens, then 78 and residing in Chester, Maryland, faces five counts:


  • Conspiracy against the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371).
  • Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations (18 U.S.C. § 1519) — multiple counts.
  • Concealment, removal, or mutilation of records (18 U.S.C. § 2071) — multiple counts.
  • Aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C. § 2).

Potential penalties if convicted include up to 5 years for conspiracy, up to 20 years per count of records destruction/falsification, and up to 3 years per count of concealment/removal (theoretical maximum exceeding 50 years, though actual sentences for similar cases are typically far lower, especially for a defendant of his age).


Core Allegations​


Prosecutors allege that beginning around April 2020 and continuing through at least June 2023, Morens conspired with two unindicted co-conspirators (widely identified from prior congressional records and details in the indictment as Peter Daszak, then-president of EcoHealth Alliance, and Gerald Keusch, a Boston University researcher and former NIH official) and others to defraud the United States by hiding federal records related to COVID-19 research grants.


Key elements:


  • After NIH terminated EcoHealth’s “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” grant (linked to work involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology amid lab-leak scrutiny), the group allegedly worked to influence restoration of funding and related messaging.
  • They deliberately shifted sensitive communications (about grants, origins theories, gain-of-function research, draft letters to NIH leadership, and “back-channel” information to a senior NIAID official—commonly understood as Fauci) to Morens’s personal Gmail account instead of official NIH systems to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and the Federal Records Act.
  • At least eight FOIA requests from groups including Judicial Watch, the Heritage Foundation, Science magazine, and others sought these records between 2020 and 2022.
  • Morens is alleged to have received improper gifts/gratuities from a co-conspirator (e.g., bottles of wine and offers of expensive meals), and later contributed to a journal submission supporting a natural-origin theory in a way prosecutors tied to these benefits.
  • The indictment quotes Morens’s own emails, including one stating he had “learned from our FOIA lady here how to make emails disappear after I am FOIA’d, but before the search starts, so I think we are all safe. Plus, I deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to Gmail.” Other messages discuss the safety of private email for avoiding disclosure.

Fauci is not charged and is referenced only indirectly (as “Senior NIAID Official 1” in some descriptions of back-channeling).


Procedural Status​


  • Morens made an initial court appearance shortly after unsealing and was released on his own recognizance.
  • On May 8, 2026, he was arraigned before a magistrate judge in Greenbelt, Maryland, and pleaded not guilty. He publicly stated he was “innocent.”
  • The case remains pending as of late July 2026. A jury trial (estimated ~7 days) has not yet been scheduled; motions deadlines and speedy-trial considerations have been addressed in court filings.

The indictment stems from earlier House Select Subcommittee investigations into COVID origins and EcoHealth funding, which publicly released many of the relevant emails showing Morens’s FOIA-avoidance tactics.


 
The Federal Records Act (FRA, primarily 44 U.S.C. Chapters 29–33) governs the creation, management, preservation, and disposition of federal records. It defines records broadly as any recorded information (regardless of form or characteristics) made or received by a federal agency under federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business, and preserved or appropriate for preservation as evidence of the agency’s organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities, or because of the informational value of the data.


Core Requirements Relevant Here​


  • Content, not medium, determines record status: Emails, messages, or notes about official business (e.g., grant discussions, COVID origins analysis, funding influence, or back-channeling to leadership) qualify as federal records even if created or stored on personal devices or accounts such as Gmail.
  • Restrictions on non-official accounts: Under 44 U.S.C. § 2911 (added by the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments of 2014), executive agency employees may not create or send a record using a non-official electronic messaging account unless they (1) copy an official account at the time of creation/transmission or (2) forward a complete copy to an official account within 20 days. NARA and agency policies (including HHS/NIH) strongly discourage routine use of personal accounts for official business.
  • Preservation and disposition: Records must be maintained according to NARA-approved schedules. Unauthorized destruction, alteration, removal, or concealment is prohibited. Agencies must report unlawful or accidental removals/destructions to NARA.
  • FOIA interplay: Federal records are generally subject to FOIA. Using personal accounts or deleting materials to evade searches undermines transparency obligations.

Personal files (purely private materials not used for agency business) are excluded, but the line is drawn by content and purpose, not the user’s subjective intent or the account used.


Implications in the Morens Case​


The indictment alleges a multi-year conspiracy (roughly April 2020–June 2023) in which Morens and others deliberately routed official communications about EcoHealth Alliance grants, bat coronavirus research, funding restoration efforts, origins messaging, and related matters through his personal Gmail to keep them out of official systems and FOIA reach. Emails quoted in reporting and the indictment show awareness of FOIA (“I try to communicate on Gmail because my NIH government email is FOIAed constantly”; references to making emails “disappear” after a FOIA request but before the search; statements about deleting unwanted materials).


FRA implications:


  • Communications meeting the records definition created or received in the course of official duties were federal records regardless of the Gmail platform. Failure to copy/forward them to official systems within 20 days violated § 2911.
  • Deliberate use of personal accounts to hide materials, combined with deletion or non-preservation, constitutes unauthorized disposition/concealment. This triggers agency reporting duties to NARA and can support criminal referral.
  • The FRA itself is largely administrative (agency heads are responsible for programs; employees can face personnel actions such as suspension or removal while still employed). It does not create standalone criminal penalties for most violations. Criminal exposure arises from companion statutes charged in the indictment:
    • 18 U.S.C. § 2071 (willful concealment, removal, mutilation, or destruction of records filed or deposited in a public office) — up to 3 years, plus potential forfeiture of office and future disqualification for custodians.
    • 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (knowing destruction, alteration, or falsification of records with intent to impede a federal investigation or matter) — up to 20 years.
    • Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371) and aiding/abetting.
  • Prosecutors frame the conduct as a scheme to defraud the United States by thwarting public access and accountability around pandemic-related grants and origins questions. Receipt of gifts (wine, meal offers) is alleged as further improper benefit tied to the efforts.
  • NARA previously requested NIH investigate potential unauthorized disposition based on earlier-released emails. The criminal case elevates this from administrative/records-management failure to felony-level accountability.

Similar patterns (personal email use, deletion discussions, FOIA evasion) appeared in broader congressional scrutiny of NIAID/NIH communications during the pandemic. Fauci’s diaries, recovered from multiple government servers after sequestration, raise parallel questions about whether contemporaneous notes created in official capacity were properly managed as records, though that recovery occurred under later HHS leadership and has not produced parallel charges.


Broader Systemic Implications​


  • Transparency and accountability: Routine or strategic use of personal accounts for sensitive official business erodes FOIA effectiveness, congressional oversight, and the historical record. It creates “shadow” communications that are harder to discover, preserve, or produce under litigation holds or investigations.
  • Enforcement rarity vs. recent shift: Pure FRA violations rarely lead to criminal charges; agencies handle most via training, audits, or personnel action. The Morens indictment (under the current DOJ) signals heightened willingness to pursue willful concealment tied to high-profile matters (COVID origins, grant integrity) using the criminal statutes that protect records.
  • Practical risks for officials: Even without criminal intent, non-compliance can trigger NARA notifications, IG investigations, FOIA litigation sanctions, adverse inference in court, or career consequences. “I didn’t know emails were records” defenses are weak given mandatory training and longstanding guidance.
  • Agency obligations: Heads of agencies (or successors) must prevent unauthorized disposition, recover materials where possible, and report incidents. Multi-server “sequestering” of materials (as described for Fauci’s diaries) can itself raise FRA concerns if it effectively removes records from normal management or access.
  • Limits of the FRA: It does not criminalize every poor records practice or FOIA delay. Intent (willfulness), the official nature of the content, and connection to investigations or public business are key for criminal liability. Purely personal notes remain outside its scope.

In short, the FRA establishes that official-business communications are government property that must be captured and preserved in official systems. Allegations of deliberate off-system routing and deletion to evade FOIA convert administrative non-compliance into potential criminal obstruction of the public’s right to the government’s own records. The Morens case tests whether prosecutors can successfully prove the required intent and records status at trial; a conviction would reinforce that personal email is not a safe harbor for official work.



 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top