Lying Weasel Fauci's Infatuation with Fame, While People were Dying

If America falls to one-party Democrat control, there'll be nowhere else to go.

Buy guns and ammo.
This was a dream-scenario to a lot of people... the time when:
  • leftists had a near-monopoly on TV News, and a 99% monopoly on social media
  • leftist lawfare was running rampant, and was widely and wildly cheered on by 50% of the country
  • leftist militias like BLM and Antifa were allowed to run rampant, assaulting people, assaulting police, looting, burning down buildings, etc, and the MSM and social media called it "mostly peaceful kristallnacht"
  • President Biden openly floated the idea of expanding the SC to 13 judges, and the "media" didn't identify a problem with that
  • government overreach was at the extent of "the fkn peons will inject what we tell them to inject, they will wear what we tell them to wear, they need our permission to gather, they need our permission to travel, they are not free to worship, they are not free to have weddings or funerals, they are not free to have guests over, they can't even buy seeds (Michigan)."
  • BS polling
  • algorithms and sycophant bot accounts on social media amplifying and ostensibly verifying the uniparty's messages while simultaneously dampening and repudiating opposition commentary (at one point it got so bad that the NYPost was banned from social media for saying things that were known to be 100% true at that point by the FBI and members of congress)
Even setting aside the covid-related BS there, in what types of countries does one party control the media, social media, the courts, dictate what news organizations are allowed to operate, and have militias running around committing violent crimes with impunity?

And at this point I'd just like to posit that "compelled speech, bans, shadow bans, sycophant bot accounts, politically biased algorithms, etc" are several levels up from mere book-burning. Books aren't as central to the zeitgeist as the wide-ranging realm of influence from social media.

Leftists will turn blue in the face denying this, but the US was not all that far from 1935 Germany in 2022. The main barrier to a new "Heil Biden" salute becoming mandatory was "all the guns and ammo in the hands of the deplorables".

If the 2022 democrats had robocops, then the deplorables' guns wouldn't have mattered much, and there would probably be no 2023 Republicans.
 
This was a dream-scenario to a lot of people... the time when:
  • leftists had a near-monopoly on TV News, and a 99% monopoly on social media
  • leftist lawfare was running rampant, and was widely and wildly cheered on by 50% of the country
  • leftist militias like BLM and Antifa were allowed to run rampant, assaulting people, assaulting police, looting, burning down buildings, etc, and the MSM and social media called it "mostly peaceful kristallnacht"
  • President Biden openly floated the idea of expanding the SC to 13 judges, and the "media" didn't identify a problem with that
  • government overreach was at the extent of "the fkn peons will inject what we tell them to inject, they will wear what we tell them to wear, they need our permission to gather, they need our permission to travel, they are not free to worship, they are not free to have weddings or funerals, they are not free to have guests over, they can't even buy seeds (Michigan)."
  • BS polling
  • algorithms and sycophant bot accounts on social media amplifying and allegedly verifying the uniparty's messages while simultaneously dampening and repudiating opposition commentary (at one point it got so bad that the NYPost was banned from social media for saying things that were known to be 100% true at that point by the FBI and members of congress
Even setting aside the covid-related BS there, in what types of countries does one party control the media, social media, the courts, dictate what news organizations are allowed to operate, and have militias running around committing violent crimes with impunity?

And at this point I'd just like to posit that "compelled speech, bans, shadow bans, sycophant bot accounts, politically biased algorithms, etc" are several levels up from mere book-burning. Books aren't as central to the zeitgeist as the wide-ranging realm of influence from social media.

Leftists will turn blue in the face denying this, but the US was not all that far from 1935 Germany in 2022. The main barrier to a new "Heil Biden" salute becoming mandatory was "all the guns and ammo in the hands of the deplorables".

If the 2022 democrats had robocops, the deplorables' guns wouldn't have mattered much, and there would probably be no 2023 Republicans.


All plausible.

All preventable, too.
 
I sure hope not.

He certainly tried to keep his diaries from being published.


Fauci’s private pandemic diaries (near-daily entries spanning roughly December 2019–December 2022) were stored on government systems and later recovered only after a prolonged internal search under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Kennedy stated that it took about eight months to locate and extract them from 11 separate servers “where they had been sequestered and secreted.” HHS then provided the materials to Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.); Paul released a compilation of more than 1,100 pages in late July 2026 ahead of Fauci’s Senate testimony.


These were contemporaneous personal notes created during Fauci’s tenure as NIAID director. As records tied to official duties on federal systems, they were subject to retention rules and congressional access rather than remaining purely private. The multi-server dispersal and the extended recovery effort are the primary documented indications of efforts to keep the material obscure or difficult to retrieve. Public reporting frames the distribution across 11 servers and the “sequestered and secreted” description as deliberate concealment that required sustained searching to overcome.


Related context on records handling​


This occurred against a broader pattern of FOIA-evasion and records issues involving Fauci’s circle:


  • Senior adviser David Morens (later indicted in connection with concealing/deleting federal records) discussed “secret back channels,” using private Gmail, handing materials in person or at Fauci’s house, and techniques to make emails “disappear” after FOIA requests. Diary entries show Fauci arranging calls with Morens amid scrutiny. Fauci had testified he had no knowledge of such a back channel on his behalf.
  • Separate emails obtained by Senate investigators show Fauci directing subordinates (including then-NIH Director Francis Collins) to “delete this e-mail after you read it” on multiple occasions in 2020. This contradicted his later sworn testimony that he never deleted official records or obstructed FOIA.

Grok again, too funny, never an original thought

“Tried to keep his diaries from being published,” ah, no dah, you know a lot of people that want their personal private diaries published

And as expected, not to do about nothing:

 
Grok again, too funny, never an original thought

“Tried to keep his diaries from being published,” ah, no dah, you know a lot of people that want their personal private diaries published

And as expected, not to do about nothing:



As records created on government systems during official duties, they were treated as federal records subject to retention and congressional access rather than purely private papers.



Poor Anchovies.
 
never happened
just the shit stain echo chamber lies

Trump has been publicly scrutinized, investigated and condemned for his COVID statements for six straight years. Nobody gave him a pardon and then announced that further questions were merely “revenge.”


And he did not “recommend bleach.” He made an ignorant, reckless speculation about whether disinfectant could somehow be used internally—bad enough on its own without converting it into a fictional instruction to drink Clorox.


None of that answers the questions raised by Fauci’s own journals: his preoccupation with his publicity, his private efforts to influence shutdown policy, and the possible gap between what he recorded privately and what he later told the public.


“Trump was bad too,” “Rand Paul dislikes him,” and “the media will forget it” are not rebuttals. They are three different ways of saying you do not want Fauci’s account examined. A pardon may prevent prosecution. It does not make his story true.
Never said he told people to drink bleach, although some MAGA did (https://www.poison.med.wayne.edu/updates-content/kstytapp2qfstf0pkacdxmz943u1hs), just highlighting one of Trump’s idiocy when Americans were looking to him for information

And again, when all said and done, what is the purpose here?

 

And, Anchovies, Fauci had no expectation of privacy for those files.


Poor Anchovies.
 
MAGA Trump


MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA[ /marquee]

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP
 
And, Anchovies, Fauci had no expectation of privacy for those files.


Poor Anchovies.
Legally, perhaps, but there is also a moral question of going out of your way in releasing another’s private thoughts for personal political ends
 
Legally, perhaps, but there is also a moral question of going out of your way in releasing another’s private thoughts for personal political ends

Is that so, Anchovies?

Anchovies’ claim frames the diary release as a moral problem: going out of one’s way to publicize another person’s private thoughts for political gain.


That framing rests on the assumption that the materials were purely private personal papers. Under the Federal Records Act and NARA rules discussed earlier, that assumption is weak for these particular documents.


Why the “private thoughts” framing is contested​


  • The entries were located on government servers (11 separate ones, according to HHS Secretary Kennedy).
  • They were created while Fauci was a senior federal official (NIAID Director) performing official duties during a major public-health crisis.
  • The content documents official activities: interactions with the President and White House, policy discussions, media strategy related to the pandemic response, scientific assessments of origins, and communications with other officials.
  • HHS treated them as agency records, searched for them, and produced them to congressional oversight committees. Congress then released them as part of an official investigation.

NARA guidance is clear that work-related diaries, journals, and notes of senior officials are not automatically personal papers. They qualify as personal only if they were not prepared or used in the transaction of agency business and served solely the individual’s private purpose. When they document official decision-making and are stored on government systems, agencies and Congress routinely treat them as federal records subject to retention and oversight.


The “personal political ends” part​


Congressional oversight of the COVID response, virus origins, and statements made under oath is a legitimate function of the Senate Homeland Security Committee. Releasing contemporaneous notes that show contrasts between private assessments and public statements falls within that function. Critics can (and do) argue the release is selective or politically timed; supporters argue it is accountability for a high-level official whose guidance affected the entire country.


Bottom line​


There is a genuine distinction between:


  1. A purely private diary kept entirely outside government systems and never used for official purposes, and
  2. Contemporaneous notes by a senior federal official, created and stored on government systems, that record official meetings, policy judgments, and public communications during a national emergency.
The second category is the one NARA rules and congressional practice treat as federal records. Anchovies’ moral objection treats the materials as if they were category 1. The legal and factual record points more strongly toward category 2. That does not eliminate every privacy or fairness concern, but it undercuts the claim that the release was simply “going out of one’s way” to expose private thoughts.



Poor Anchovies.

Now, holler "Musk" and go walk your nonexistsent "dog".
 
This was a dream-scenario to a lot of people... the time when:
  • leftists had a near-monopoly on TV News, and a 99% monopoly on social media
  • leftist lawfare was running rampant, and was widely and wildly cheered on by 50% of the country
  • leftist militias like BLM and Antifa were allowed to run rampant, assaulting people, assaulting police, looting, burning down buildings, etc, and the MSM and social media called it "mostly peaceful kristallnacht"
  • President Biden openly floated the idea of expanding the SC to 13 judges, and the "media" didn't identify a problem with that
  • government overreach was at the extent of "the fkn peons will inject what we tell them to inject, they will wear what we tell them to wear, they need our permission to gather, they need our permission to travel, they are not free to worship, they are not free to have weddings or funerals, they are not free to have guests over, they can't even buy seeds (Michigan)."
  • BS polling
  • algorithms and sycophant bot accounts on social media amplifying and ostensibly verifying the uniparty's messages while simultaneously dampening and repudiating opposition commentary (at one point it got so bad that the NYPost was banned from social media for saying things that were known to be 100% true at that point by the FBI and members of congress)
Even setting aside the covid-related BS there, in what types of countries does one party control the media, social media, the courts, dictate what news organizations are allowed to operate, and have militias running around committing violent crimes with impunity?

And at this point I'd just like to posit that "compelled speech, bans, shadow bans, sycophant bot accounts, politically biased algorithms, etc" are several levels up from mere book-burning. Books aren't as central to the zeitgeist as the wide-ranging realm of influence from social media.

Leftists will turn blue in the face denying this, but the US was not all that far from 1935 Germany in 2022. The main barrier to a new "Heil Biden" salute becoming mandatory was "all the guns and ammo in the hands of the deplorables".

If the 2022 democrats had robocops, then the deplorables' guns wouldn't have mattered much, and there would probably be no 2023 Republicans.
Tell it....
 
Back
Top