Lying Weasel Fauci's Infatuation with Fame, While People were Dying
- Thread starter WCM
- Start date
Exactly. Among many others things "rationalized" during Covid we still have. That was all planned.
Jaysus, no we got Hitler incorporated, ain’t easy keeping up with MAGA’s conspiracies
So in your opinion encouraging masks and vaccine to try to contain the virus was wrong?
And he is still is 329 times behind your Messiah taking the 5th
When you find out ( and I knew) masks were ineffective, the six foot rule had zero science behind it and their were other viable treatments other than those vaccines which were jammed through without complete testing....Yes. I do. Do not forget the pharmaceutical companies were and are protected from any lawsuits resulting in illnesses. The same governments that did that demanded they be forced on their citizens.
Would you have said the same thing in 1918? Especially about the election?
Hmmmmm.
Now that the COVID-19 vaccines are here, it’s time to celebrate the beginning of the end of this plague, right? Not so fast. The media and expert classes seem determined to make permanent the pandemic’s abnormal way of life.
In December, a failing New York Times piece, “Here’s Why Vaccinated People Still Need to Wear a Mask,” kicked off the perma-gloom.
Vaccinated people will still need to wear masks, because those with high viral loads could be “even worse spreaders,” the paper quoted Dr. Yvonne Maldonado of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
“Even worse spreaders!” That’s horrible.
It’s also horribly misleading.
I know this, because I read the rest of the article.
The fear arises from studies on monkeys, which found that some vaccinated monkeys didn’t get sick but still carried the novel coronavirus in their noses.
But wait: “Those monkeys were intentionally exposed to massive amounts of virus and still had less virus than unvaccinated animals,” Weill Cornell virologist John Moore told the Times. Ah. Well, maybe don’t intentionally expose yourself to “massive amounts” of the virus, then.
A continual drumbeat of opinion keeps repeating that vaccination will change little or nothing.
The new line is that we will be wearing masks indefinitely, and we should really be wearing more serious masks and certainly more than one.
Beware the experts who want lockdowns to go on forever
Now that the COVID-19 vaccines are here, it’s time to celebrate the beginning of the end of this plague, right? Not so fast. The media and expert classes seem determined to make permanent the pande…nypost.com
I miss Tinfoil.
1918 masks were ineffective also for the influenza outbreak. Science was no where near as advanced as during Covid. That comparison really is not fair though I get your point. They did not have mail in voting at that time for the same reasons, they probably could not have pulled it off back then.
Trump said if you take the 5th, it is an admission of guilt.
That is true. And people were afraid to go to the polls which was the only way to vote. I remember reading there was only something around 40% turned out to vote. And that was at a time when everyone voted.
During the 1918 U.S. midterm elections (held November 5 amid the deadly second wave of the influenza pandemic), many people stayed away from the polls due to illness, quarantine, fear of infection, or lack of healthy poll workers. Turnout fell sharply, and contemporary reports explicitly linked the drop to the flu.
Turnout among the voting-eligible population dropped from roughly 50–52% in the 1914 midterms to about 40% in 1918. Analyses note that the flu contributed substantially (alongside factors like millions of men overseas in World War I and limited women’s suffrage in most states). One estimate indicated that if even a fraction of the drop was flu-related, it kept hundreds of thousands from voting.
Specific contemporary accounts include:
- Reports that New Mexicans were “too afraid of the flu” to vote, with “light turnout” in Arizona despite disinfection of polling places.
- Voters in California describing the day as the “quietest within memory,” with some saying things like “I really should not have come out to vote with this flu!” and immediately needing to return to bed.
- Polling places that could not open in areas such as parts of Sacramento and smaller California towns because “there were not enough citizens who were well enough” (or willing) to serve as election workers.
Public-health measures affected the process: bans or restrictions on gatherings limited campaigning; some places required masks (San Francisco’s “first masked ballot”); voters were sometimes directed to line up single-file; and temporary outdoor setups were used in places. There was little serious discussion of postponing the elections nationwide, partly due to wartime civic pressure and patriotism encouraging people to vote anyway.
The flu killed an estimated 675,000 people in the U.S. overall, with heavy impact in fall 1918. While the election proceeded and results were accepted, the combination of sickness, fear, and disrupted logistics clearly suppressed participation in many communities.
Low 1918 U.S. Midterm Turnout | Shared Grok Conversation
Were people afraid to go to the polls in 1918 (during the "Spanish Flu"?
grok.com
evince
Truthmatters
Go wack off in public
Just like me your intellectual hero
Then take a nappy in your clay jar