.
You should title the study so that it seems to cover global warming, then they'll believe everything about it and some short girl will shout at you and blame you for her bad childhood somehow.
Man Dies, Wife Critical From Chloroquine After Hearing Trump Tout
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
You should title the study so that it seems to cover global warming, then they'll believe everything about it and some short girl will shout at you and blame you for her bad childhood somehow.
trump has no business touting a drug that's untested for Covid 19. As usual he's going by his feels, and claims that he has a natural ability in science. There are some people who will trust him as an authority figure and never check for themselves the BS he's peddling.
"At a Thursday news briefing, Trump trumpeted that chloroquine had shown “very, very encouraging early results” and said “we’re going to be able to make that drug available almost immediately.” Minutes later, FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, an oncologist, clarified that the drug would be available “in the setting of a clinical trial — a large, pragmatic clinical trial — to actually gather that information and answer the question that needs to be answered and — asked and answered.”
On Friday, the president said, “It may work, it may not work. I feel good about it. That’s all it is. Just a feeling.”
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/22...-experts-over-malaria-drugs-against-covid-19/
We should have been hearing it from his doctor, then.
Fuck off sock. Ignored.
Just do some searching.....https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/20/a-coronavirus-treatment-could-come-much-quicker-than-a-vaccine.html
There are dozens of links....
I'm not sure why he shouldn't mention it as a possiblity....
Tell us, lab tech, how would you have designed a more efficacious experiment given the same number of patients and symptoms. Keep in mind that experiments require adequate controls, cunt, since apparently you were unaware of that.
Cunt, you make sure the control group and the treated group are at the same stage of infection. From a comment in the link that you obviously failed to read, cockbite.
“Prof. Christian Drosten from Charite Berlin commented on this and was not so impressed.
He sees a big problem with the design of the study. He said that the patients in the Chloroquine group were all much further progressed in the disease than the control group and he thinks the superior reduction in viral load was mostly due to the natural healing process that was further along in the Chloroquine group compared to the control group.”
Surely a larger, well designed study can be done soon to settle this.”
Ignorant cunt
They decided their DOSAGE...HOW, EXACTLY??
SOLID PROOF THAT THERE ARE STILL SOME DUNCE-O-CRATS IN ARIZONA....
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
From a fucking comment? Are you fucking serious you stupid, ignorant cunt? You didn't read the study, but you based your opinion of the study on some comment that one person made???
Definitely proves you were never more than a sample analyzer lab tech.
From the actual study, not what some commenter had to say:
Pathetic, even from you, LAB TECH. From the fucking comments. Try thinking for yourself, loser.
Thanks for confirming you support putting American lives at risk over a treatment in favor of the Almighty Dollar.
Just so you and I are clear, what value do you put on an American life? $1K? $1M? $10M? What about the lives of your family? How many dollars are they worth? Numbers please so we can be clear about your position, sir.
The fact remains this drug has been tested for malaria victims and has known risks. If you were as smart as you think you are, you'd know that fact and also know it's not been used widely for treatment on this disease. Still, your position on money over American lives is clear and I'm curious about your reply on the value of an American life.
You are, of course, free to run from answering or to use a sock puppet to distract and avoid answering that way. Either way, a non-answer will be seen as less than honorable on your part.
Another truly sad and pathetic response. Even though I do not have any socks, and think sock puppets pathetic too, I have no doubt you have one or more.
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
So the economic impact shouldn't be considered at all? Got it. Let's just require all commerce to shut down and everyone to stay inside their homes for the next 365 days. That way we could be sure to stop the spread, right? Anything less shows that you value "the almighty dollar" over human life. Your disingenuous question is moronic. Let me ask you a question. If you could travel back in time and kill Hitler when he was a baby would you do it?
Your mention of the risk of treatment is just plain moronic. Anyone who the treatment is being tested on is already at risk of dying from the virus itself. Get better at debating, troll.
Thank goodness a fool like you isn't in charge of our country. There is obviously a balance to be struck between economic impact and public health. If you can't wrap your brain around that, you have my pity. If you're just being disingenuous, you have my contempt.
As far as using a drug that is already approved to treat one indication to treat a different indication, it is far safer than approving a brand new drug. If you weren't an utter moron you would know that. If you were one quarter as smart as you think you are, you'd know that it can take years to approve a drug that's already on the market for a new indication. Do we have a year to find a way to treat Covid-19 patients, DU-h? NYC is expected to have peak outbreak in less than a month. How many valuable American lives might be lost without an effective treatment? Thanks for demonstrating that you're far more interested in scoring political points than finding solutions to problems. Hallmark of a Democrat.
From a fucking comment? Are you fucking serious you stupid, ignorant cunt? You didn't read the study, but you based your opinion of the study on some comment that one person made???
Definitely proves you were never more than a sample analyzer lab tech.
From the actual study, not what some commenter had to say:
Pathetic, even from you, LAB TECH. From the fucking comments. Try thinking for yourself, loser.
Prove it wrong, cunt. I’ll wait.
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
I just did dipshit. I pulled a quote from the actual study that directly contradicted what your commenter said. A fucking comment!
Edit: I just went to the site and left a comment myself, you stupid fuck. ANYONE can leave a comment!
Last edited:
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
I think the draw here, which is why DT touted this drug, is that it offers hope in what seems like a hopeless situation.
Hope is a good thing, but care must be taken to avoid placing too much belief in something which is unproven.
The problem with hoping this drug will be a game-changer is the let-down if it is not.
Logic must prevail.
Here is some simple logic:
If this was really the easy solution it is hoped to be, it would have been used widely and effectively before this.
It almost sounds too good to be true, that a solution to this disease which has eluded every nation it has struck before it exploded here, could suddenly be found just in time to prevent a catastrophic event in the USA. Perhaps there is a bit of US exceptionalism at work to think that we alone could solve this problem which has eluded the rest of the world thus far.
And you know what they say about something that sounds too good to be true.
It usually is.
Hope is a good thing, but care must be taken to avoid placing too much belief in something which is unproven.
The problem with hoping this drug will be a game-changer is the let-down if it is not.
Logic must prevail.
Here is some simple logic:
If this was really the easy solution it is hoped to be, it would have been used widely and effectively before this.
It almost sounds too good to be true, that a solution to this disease which has eluded every nation it has struck before it exploded here, could suddenly be found just in time to prevent a catastrophic event in the USA. Perhaps there is a bit of US exceptionalism at work to think that we alone could solve this problem which has eluded the rest of the world thus far.
And you know what they say about something that sounds too good to be true.
It usually is.
From a fucking comment? Are you fucking serious you stupid, ignorant cunt? You didn't read the study, but you based your opinion of the study on some comment that one person made???
Definitely proves you were never more than a sample analyzer lab tech.
From the actual study, not what some commenter had to say:
Pathetic, even from you, LAB TECH. From the fucking comments. Try thinking for yourself, loser.
Different stages, dumbfuck. And not even exhibiting similar symptoms. One patient was so advanced, they died before the trial ended.
Stupid fucking cunt.
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
Different stages, dumbfuck. And not even exhibiting similar symptoms. One patient was so advanced, they died before the trial ended.
Stupid fucking cunt.
According to... a commenter. You moron. Read the study yourself. I left a comment on the site, dumbfuck.
Sad, but when you start out with a lie, compound it with insults and then don't even answer the question, you clearly define yourself, sir. Sad.
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
I read the study, cunt, Different stages.
Checkmate
You obviously didn't cunt. The study clearly stated that "No significant difference was observed between hydroxychloroquine treated patients and control patients with regard to gender, clinical status and duration of symptoms prior to inclusion."
Duration of symptoms prior to inclusion = stage. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. That's ok, it's above your pay grade, LAB TECH. You based your moronic post ON A FUCKING COMMENT. What a pathetic clown! Did I mention that I left a comment on the site, lab tech? Go look. Anyone can leave a comment on that site. You thought it required some kind of accreditation! Fucking fool!
You obviously didn't cunt. The study clearly stated that "No significant difference was observed between hydroxychloroquine treated patients and control patients with regard to gender, clinical status and duration of symptoms prior to inclusion."
Duration of symptoms prior to inclusion = stage. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. That's ok, it's above your pay grade, LAB TECH. You based your moronic post ON A FUCKING COMMENT. What a pathetic clown! Did I mention that I left a comment on the site, lab tech? Go look. Anyone can leave a comment on that site. You thought it required some kind of accreditation! Fucking fool!
View attachment 14698
There were 3 groups with different symptoms, bitch. One fucking died, clown.