Correct. Nobody is denying that.
McCloskey’s Gun Didn’t Work So A Prosecutor Ordered It Reassembled And Then Declared
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
Correct. Nobody is denying that.
In the Night
Contributor
They were legal in doing so. They broke no law.
Correct, but that's not the point of the charges. Others have right to not be assaulted or threatened with being shot.
In the Night
Contributor
You are, through another semantics fallacy.
In the Night
Contributor
Yes it is.
They did.
2005 Missouri Revised Statutes - § 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons
(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner
Nope. They were not on their property. Watch the video and look at Google maps.
Patricia obviously did that but I haven't seen any pix of Mark doing it. Just carrying his AR is not a crime; he does have a right of both ownership and self-defense.
All of which are necessary for the prosecution to make their case....if they don't plead out. Patricia is obviously guilty and I think the city wants this behind them as quickly as possible.
That's for sure. The governor will probably just end it quickly for the good of everyone.
No doubt that's being pushed.
In the Night
Contributor
Correct, but that's not the point of the charges. Others have right to not be assaulted or threatened with being shot.
They lose that right when assaulting another or invading their property. It IS the point of the charges. This couple have the right to defend themselves and their property.
In the Night
Contributor
Contextomy fallacy. Read the rest of that law, dumbass. It specifically talks about self defense. So does the Missouri State constitution.
In the Night
Contributor
Lie. They were on the property. They destroyed their gate. They are threatening them with grievous harm. They have the right to defend themselves.
In the Night
Contributor
So does she. She broke no law.
In the Night
Contributor
The prosecution has no case.
In the Night
Contributor
Please articulate exactly the reason for the charges versus actual laws.
Political persecution by a government official under color of law. The actual law and right of both of these citizens are that they have the right to defend themselves and their property.
That's what the defense will have to prove but the video only shows Patty going psycho. Is she a relative?
Is this where you demand that Trump send in his Praetorian Guard to quell the blacks and free the old white heros from Socialists?
The video and Google maps do not lie.