Iolo/Penderyn
Verified User
So it's OK for your country to elect representatives of your choosing but not OK for the US to elect representatives of our choosing.
If you chose them. You didn't, not by three million, as you know.
So it's OK for your country to elect representatives of your choosing but not OK for the US to elect representatives of our choosing.
If you chose them. You didn't, not by three million, as you know.
You read it, America hating Iolo sock.This message is hidden because Earl remains forever on your ignore list.
If you chose them. You didn't, not by three million, as you know.
So you would rather see a half-dozen densely populated metropolitan counties make the choice for the rest of the US. Our Founders saw it differently and won that debate a long time ago.
It would be a damned sight better for the health of this country and society in general, than letting a handful of backward, sparsely populated, mostly rural red states and the low-educated hillbillies and hicks who dwell there make the choice.
By all the brainwashed right-wing zombies.FOX News, the most watched and the most trusted cable news in America.
Earl's stuck in a loop again. Someone notify his programmer.FOX News, the most watched and the most trusted cable news in America.
By all the brainwashed right-wing zombies.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Of course, the Republicans want to take us back to the late 19th century, with massive poverty, widespread pollution, no middle class to speak of, most of the country in bondage to big business and the U.S. just a fraction away from becoming just another banana republic.Well, I've never been faced with such a choice, but, given the alternative, I suppose I'd vote for almost anyone, to be honest, though I've never voted tory and liberal only once, in a local election where the man had done me a favour - and I've regretted it ever since. I think it is difficult for right-wing Americans to realise just how totally weird most outsiders find the trumpite perversion - and I know no other appropriate word, honestly!
The BBC is a lot more objective than Fox and the other right-wing propaganda mills that so many of the righties here depend on for their brainwashing.The BBC is controlled by your tory puppets nowadays. No - it's a natural cultural reaction against what is totally foreign in American politics.
Don't mind Dark Stool. He's just abysmally ignorant.Nor can the Queen, you nit!
No, the elected government do it for those who elect them,allegedly. They certainly don't do it for the monarchy. The main argument for our system of government is a fat incompetent called Trumpf.
I know that you are ignorant of American elections, America hating Iolo sock but...Trump- 304 electoral votes and Clinton 227.
Also, 5 million illegals (non-citizens) voted.
Probably a good thing. I'm considering putting the bot on ignore myself.This message is hidden because Earl remains forever on your ignore list.
So you would rather see a half-dozen densely populated metropolitan counties make the choice for the rest of the US. Our Founders saw it differently and won that debate a long time ago.
How else could they have kept slavery?
The BBC is a lot more objective than Fox and the other right-wing propaganda mills that so many of the righties here depend on for their brainwashing.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Yes, most broadcasters are, but the Charter says the BBC should be impartial - which it tends to happen only at election times nowadays.