Did you actually read what I wrote? Where in that statement did I say it was wrong to talk about the president on a political forum? Show me what words I used that lead you to that conclusion. Read it again and this time pay attention to the words I actually used and not the ones you think I used.
That wasnt my question. I'll try again. What does trumps behavior have to do with the existence of absolute morality or the lack thereof. And likewise whether or not anyone addresses his behavior has nothing to do with the whether or not absolute morals exist. Absolute morals either exist or they dont and peoples behavior or discussion about those behaviors have no bearing on whether they exist or not.
G
No you havent. What you've done is whine that "moral absolutists" on this site havent condemned trump for his behavior. What you cant seem to get through that thick skull of yours is people not responding to someone elses behavior neither proves nor disproves the existence of absolute morals. Its just you creaming your shorts about trump.
blah blah
LMFAO i love when you decide to give up. You become even more funny
Yes they do.
According to philosophy.
What issue is that?
Contextomy fallacy.
TDS. You are amoral, Hugo.
RQAA.
What criminal actions of the President, Hugo? Are you talking about Biden? He was never President.
Quite right.
That's exactly what I'm asking about and what you're avoiding talking about.
Can something exist even someone doesnt believe it exists?
Yes. The converse is also true. Something might not exist that someone believes does exist.
Running for the hills as expected.
As far as this topic is concerned, You were done when you chose politics over reason and common sense.
