If you like cheap liquor.... with Captain Morgan being the notable exception.
If you like cheap liquor.... with Captain Morgan being the notable exception.
I did not agree to that. And how many times are you going to beat a dead horse?!We already agreed that there is universal, objective morality in some situations.
And alcohol use, drinking age, how often and with whom to have sex, what one's life purpose should be, when anger is proper to express, and lots more.We already agreed that there is universal, objective morality in some situations. There will always be debates on some questions of morality, especially when you're talking about religion which labels some absolutely nonsensical things as immoral, but other things can be labeled as universally immoral... like FGM, child sex crimes, etc.
It's the only kind that's moral.If you like cheap liquor.
No.so morality begins with a determination of rights?
does Christian morality begin with a determination of rights?
YARPall you neocons just hate peace and love war.
you're demented demonic creeps.
RQAA. A moral is a core guideline. It establishes what you value. It is your behavior and custom. The word stems from Latin 'mores'.but what IS a moral, clod worshipper?
Random phrases. No apparent coherency.morality is not complex.
its just more rare tha fallen individuals can admit.
so the sociopaths try to pretend morality must be something else.
something about church authority figures, or beads.
healer heal thyself. know yourself, know the universe.
You did agree. In fact you "absolutely" (your word) agreed until you realized that your agreement didn't align with your politics.I did not agree to that. And how many times are you going to beat a dead horse?!
Random words. No apparent coherency.just answer why. you masonic fucktoids have gone completely retarded with your pseudo-intellectual, mallibeeral, devil worshipping, corporate cocksucking bullshit.
Too funny! ZenMode is declaring that others agree that his subjective morality is absolute universal morality. You can't make this shit up.We already agreed that there is universal, objective morality in some situations.
Too funny! How can there be debates about absolute truth? If you have declared something to be an absolute truth, it can't very well be debated now, can it?There will always be debates on some questions of morality,
... such as your stupid Climate religion that labels CO2, a life-essential compound as "immoral" and in need of being "reduced."especially when you're talking about religion which labels some absolutely nonsensical things as immoral,
...i.e. your subjective morality, right? I see how this works. Too funny!but other things can be labeled as universally immoral...
Random words. No apparent coherency.sophists hide and destroy truth, to inculcate a reasonless animal state and tyranny.
this is you neocon devil worshippers.
AI is a sophistry machine. that's why tyrants love it.
all true stories.
You are a liar. No surprise that you absolutists are not actually moral.You did agree. In fact you "absolutely" (your word) agreed until you realized that your agreement didn't align with your politics.
I assume you means fake AI programs like GoogleAI, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, and others.
A robot is not sentient. You can't kill it.and is it wrong to kill a terminator robot sent to get you?
There is an absolute truth in logic, which you are ignoring.Thats your opinion just like your morals. There is no absolute truth.
No. It begins with you.No morality is the basis of right just like Jefferson wrote in the D of I
No it begins with Jesus
How do you know, Hugo? You are amoral.You are a liar. No surprise that you absolutists are not actually moral.
Your morals don't come from any god or gods. They are created by you and you alone.Where did I say that? Jesus is God. God has always existed.
Irrelevant
Im pretty sure Jesus isnt worried how beautifully you think he restated morality.
No
of course he does because it exposes his lies, like morals are relative
A moral is not an opinion.You misunderstood. I was answering someone who believe morals are not absolute. He keeps telling me his opinion and I told him his opinion is like his morals they're his. Stating that there is no absolute truth, according to him, so it renders his opinion meaningless.
...according to your morals.correct. morals are not relative. genocide is always wrong.