He does, Hugo.He does, Hugo.
He does, Hugo.He does, Hugo.
Like I said, you want to present your opinion and then not defend/debate it. You are only proving my point.Morals are subjective. Not an opinion.
Some women want it.Probably the ones gettin' the choppins.
Have you no sympathy or empathy?
Would he notice?Well, if you were about 9, would you want your clitoris chopped off?
...according to your morals.That happens in America because of muslims.
We don't need that here.
What if it was you? And your family was doing it, because you're a muslim.
It is not illegal in the United States, Hugo.Really? Because it is illegal.
It is not illegal in the United States, Hugo.It is not illegal in the United States, Hugo.
The one undergoing the procedure must be 18 or older, however.
No opinion is being discussed here, Void.Like I said, you want to present your opinion and then not defend/debate it.
Attempted proof by void. Void argument fallacy.You are only proving my point.
What opinion, Void?When you are presented with something that goes against your opinion,
No opinion is being discussed here, Void.you default to your opinion
Redefinition fallacy.- "RQAA."
No beliefs are being discussed here, Void.That Way you never have to actually defend your beliefs.
That is an opinion. It's an opinion that you refuse to debate or defend. When questioned on your opinion, you just restate your opinion because you can't actually defend it.Morals are subjective. Not an opinion.
You are presenting an opinion and I'm presenting an opinion. I am willing to discuss/defend my opinion. You are not. When questioned on your opinion, you reference your opinion.No opinion is being discussed here, Void.
Its not imposing morals on anyone to say there are absolute morals. Establishing your "own morals" is a bullshit way of saying I dont like being accountable. Which morals you decide to live is not the same as saying there are no absolute morals.Your morals are your morals. My morals are my morals. There is no such thing as 'absolute morals'. You cannot impose your morals on anyone else anymore than you can impose your religious beliefs on anyone else by force.
You establish your own morals. They are yours. You are the only one that can establish them or change them.
Your morals are as unique to you as your fingerprints.
You have often confused your morals with 'reality', with various verbs or events, the law, or even with the morals of another.
Of course you defend Trump ,he is your cum source!Trump is not kin, but I do defend him, yes.
MAGA is not a person.
Go learn what 'fascism' means.
Capitalism is not fascism.
I never met a homophobic, who wasn't on the Down Low !And you're a faggot that dreams of cock.
Everybody's different, did you have a salient point?
No. That is the English language.That is an opinion.
I do not need to defend the English language.It's an opinion that you refuse to debate or defend.
Not an opinion. The English language.When questioned on your opinion,
I do not need to defend the English language.you just restate your opinion because you can't actually defend it.
It is exactly that. There are no 'absolute morals'.Its not imposing morals on anyone to say there are absolute morals.
No. It is a way of saying you are (or are not) holding yourself accountable. You are accountable to your morals.Establishing your "own morals" is a bullshit way of saying I dont like being accountable.
There are no 'absolute morals'. Each person establishes their own morals, just as they establish their own reality.Which morals you decide to live is not the same as saying there are no absolute morals.
I have already listed them. RQAA.Unless you can find someone who says rape is a moral good your point is meaningless.
RQAA.Its the age of the internet so it should be pretty easy to find someone who could tell you the moral good in rape.
Mantra 1e. Lame. TDSOf course you defend Trump ,he is your cum source!
Nope. That is an opinion written in English. An opinion that you won't defend/debate, but will just keep blindly repeating because that's all you've got.No. That is the English language.
I do not need to defend the English language.
Not an opinion. The English language.
I do not need to defend the English language.
They don't care about our laws, silly.Really? Because it is illegal.
Nor do murderers. But we still have laws.They don't care about our laws, silly.
I think most people might not understand the true Genesis of Human Morality. Moralism/societal principles, values, and beliefs began after we all, as a species, crept out of the primordial swamp, found us some legs and one of us thereafter looked up and saw the moon one dark and cold winter night.What are the objections? Why should all morals be true every time in history and around the world?
That is what I mean by relative. Actions relative to a situation, like a tiger.There was nothing relative about those early societal principles, values, and beliefs because they were based on basic daily and nightly observation..."don't follow the rules and you got munched by a Saber-tooth Tiger. And here we are 2026 AD, where most proles are not following those hard-won rules from way-back yore.