Mueller defends Barr: Says no contradiction on obstruction

The Mueller report says "Under analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct by the president, such as suborning perjury, intimidating witnesses or fabricating evidence because those prohibitions raise no separation of powers questions."
The result is either Stretch is lying or he is ignorant. The Mueller report describes these and other evidence of Trump obstruction.
 
Darth Omar said:
You know better than that, surely lol.

You can be ‘acutely sloppy’ driving an automobile and hurt someone and get charged with gross negligence. The two terms are perfectly synonymous but only one of them are found in the statute pertaining to classified information.

It was a word-change done to keep from indicting Hillary—and it was bloody brazen. It’s like they don’t care that people know what they are doing. And they got away with it.
Click to expand...

Surely you know better than to think there was a conspiracy to protect Hillary lol. So far she's gotten away with Benghazi, emails, Clinton Foundation, Seth Rich, maybe even the Bosnian genocide. And after all that the deep state wasn't able to get her elected to the presidency. It took the Russians to swing the votes to trump.

You guys have gone over the edge with the Hillary conspiracy theories. Use your melon lol.
 
Last edited:
Darth Omar said:
Those are legal *opinions* and are totally open to challenge.

All it would take would be for someone to indict a sitting president and send it to SCOTUS. Mullet had an opportunity to do just that but he chose not to.

Enough of pretending there was some sort of insurmountable legal barrier that kept Mullet from actually indicting Trump instead of smearing him with innuendo.

Yesterday was a low point for our system of justice.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why I should accept your extra-sensory perception as the reason Mueller didn't indict. Do you think something bad would have happened to him if he did?
 
christiefan915 said:
Surely you know better than to think there was a conspiracy to protect Hillary lol. So far she's gotten away with Benghazi, emails, Clinton Foundation, Seth Rich, maybe even the Bosnian genocide. And after all that the deep state wasn't able to get her elected to the presidency. It took the Russians to swing the votes to trump.

You guys have gone over the edge with the Hillary conspiracy theories. Use your melon lol.
Click to expand...

I’m not sure anyone on the left should make fun of Conspiracy theories after the last two years lol.
 
Darth Omar said:
You are quite the Hillary apologist.

You must be proud of yourself. I noticed you skipped the gross negligence/extreme carelessness absurdity.
Click to expand...

How does this definition apply to careless handling of emails? I don't know what your beef is with Hillary but you're really reaching to pin this on her lol.

gross negligence

n. carelessness which is in reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, and is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence, but it is just shy of being intentionally evil. If one has borrowed or contracted to take care of another's property, then gross negligence is the failure to actively take the care one would of his/her own property. If gross negligence is found by the trier of fact (judge or jury), it can result in the award of punitive damages on top of general and special damages.
 
Superfreak said:
That is the problem with liberal morons. You don't understand our justice system. You think it is 'guilty until proven innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt'.
Click to expand...

He wasn't on trial, dummy. Why do you think we want to see an unredacted version of the report? We want to know why Mueller didn't clear him 100%.

Imbecile.
 
Superfreak said:
The vast majority were Russians. The Americans indicted were not indicted for collusion or obstruction etc... some like Manafort were exposed for other crimes committed long before joining trump (though Clinton friend Podesta did not get indicted... shocking!), others were indicted for 'lies'.
Click to expand...

Nice the way you completely disregarded all the Americans who were caught up in that net... like US Military Gen. Michael Flynn for god's sake... and weasels like Cohen, Stone, Papadopolous.

You RWNJs are unbelievable the way you want to excuse their crimes with "process" or other excuses. A crime is a crime and these people were legally prosecuted. And, Manafort was prosecuted for obstruction along with Stone so you're wrong that no Americans were indicted for that.
 
christiefan915 said:
He wasn't on trial, dummy. Why do you think we want to see an unredacted version of the report? We want to know why Mueller didn't clear him 100%.

Imbecile.
Click to expand...

Again moron, you prove you don't comprehend our Justice system. It is not the job to prove someone's complete innocence. You fucking idiot. But thanks for proving my point. Many liberals are morons who done understand our Justice system
 
christiefan915 said:
Nice the way you completely disregarded all the Americans who were caught up in that net... like US Military Gen. Michael Flynn for god's sake... and weasels like Cohen, Stone, Papadopolous.

You RWNJs are unbelievable the way you want to excuse their crimes with "process" or other excuses. A crime is a crime and these people were legally prosecuted. And, Manafort was prosecuted for obstruction along with Stone so you're wrong that no Americans were indicted for that.
Click to expand...

Try improving your reading comprehension. I stated the vast majority were Russians. That is accurate. The few Americans indicted were not indicted for collusion/conspiracy/etc... A few were indicted for 'lies'. Lol... Was the obstruction regarding the Russian collision or their crimes?
 
Superfreak said:
Again moron, you prove you don't comprehend our Justice system. It is not the job to prove someone's complete innocence. You fucking idiot. But thanks for proving my point. Many liberals are morons who done understand our Justice system
Click to expand...

Look, you insufferable ninny, trump was not on trial and no legal verdict ("guilty" or "not guilty") applied. It was a fact-finding mission, not a prosecution. And the facts showed that "if prosecutors had confidence that the president clearly didn't commit a crime, "we would have said that."

Try to respond to what I actually wrote instead of listening to the voices in your head. Now piss off.
 
christiefan915 said:
Nice the way you completely disregarded all the Americans who were caught up in that net... like US Military Gen. Michael Flynn for god's sake... and weasels like Cohen, Stone, Papadopolous.

You RWNJs are unbelievable the way you want to excuse their crimes with "process" or other excuses. A crime is a crime and these people were legally prosecuted. And, Manafort was prosecuted for obstruction along with Stone so you're wrong that no Americans were indicted for that.
Click to expand...

That said... So why weren't Brennan and Coney indicted for their lies? Why did Podesta (tied to clinton)get a deal while his partner manfort(tied to Trump) got indicted? According to you...a crime is a crime.
 
christiefan915 said:
Look, you insufferable ninny, trump was not on trial and no legal verdict ("guilty" or "not guilty") applied. It was a fact-finding mission, not a prosecution. And the facts showed that "if prosecutors had confidence that the president clearly didn't commit a crime, "we would have said that."

Try to respond to what I actually wrote instead of listening to the voices in your head. Now piss off.
Click to expand...

LMAO... No you fucking idiot. You do not even understand what a special counsel is for. Again you fucking idiot, it is not his job to 100% confirm someone's innocence. It's too decide whether evidence is strong enough to indict. Try to learn the concept of innocence until proven guilty. Also read what you just wrote... You claim you want to know why Mueller didn't declare him 100% innocent, then in your next post say no verdict was supposed to apply? Thanks again for proving yourself a moron
 
Superfreak said:
Try improving your reading comprehension. I stated the vast majority were Russians. That is accurate. The few Americans indicted were not indicted for collusion/conspiracy/etc... A few were indicted for 'lies'. Lol... Was the obstruction regarding the Russian collision or their crimes?
Click to expand...

Ninny, Do your own homework on the obstruction, I'm not spoon-feeding it to you. And you've also disregarded the several indictments for fraud.

It's always good to see a RWNJ freely admit that lying under oath is laughable. trump taught you well.
 
christiefan915 said:
Ninny, Do your own homework on the obstruction, I'm not spoon-feeding it to you. And you've also disregarded the several indictments for fraud.

It's always good to see a RWNJ freely admit that lying under oath is laughable. trump taught you well.
Click to expand...

Again you mindless twit...i did no such thing. I said the Americans indicted were not related to the collusion nonsense. I also did not laugh at lying under oath. Once again you've proven your own ignorance. I laughed at the fact that you don't know why they were charged with obstruction. I also notice you ignore the lies of Comey and Brennan. You fucking idiot
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... No you fucking idiot. You do not even understand what a special counsel is for. Again you fucking idiot, it is not his job to 100% confirm someone's innocence. It's too decide whether evidence is strong enough to indict. Try to learn the concept of innocence until proven guilty. Also read what you just wrote... You claim you want to know why Mueller didn't declare him 100% innocent, then in your next post say no verdict was supposed to apply? Thanks again for proving yourself a moron
Click to expand...

Thanks for proving that you're an illiterate moron. I never said anything about Mueller "100% confirming someone's innocence." In fact I never used the word "innocence" in any of my posts, that was the voices in your head again. I said why didn't Mueller CLEAR trump 100% (of the allegations against him.) Y O U are the ignoramus who keeps throwing the word "innocent" into the posts.

You' must be smashed, you're posting like a drunken fool. Go sleep it off, moron.
 
Superfreak said:
Again you mindless twit...i did no such thing. I said the Americans indicted were not related to the collusion nonsense. I also did not laugh at lying under oath. Once again you've proven your own ignorance. I laughed at the fact that you don't know why they were charged with obstruction. I also notice you ignore the lies of Comey and Brennan. You fucking idiot
Click to expand...

Refresh my memory on Comey's lies. You should be kissing Comey's feet, you fucking loon. He handed you trump on a silver platter. It's laughable that you can bring up anyone's lying when you support that narcissistic, sociopathic, dishonest orange blob now infesting the WH.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top