Mueller report given to Bar

reagansghost said:
isn't it true Mueller reports directly to Barr?

isn't it also true Barr has been able to access all of Mueller's evidence since Trump appointed him?

and is it even possible Trump and his lawyers haven't been working with Barr continuously?


just heard Barr may submit his report to Congress later tonight.............how can he edit/redact Mueller's lengthy report in a few hours or a few days?

naw, no Trump con here
Click to expand...

And the liberal excuses, for not getting their way, begin. :palm:
 
archives said:
Are you really that naive?

Of course, what did you think the purpose of the umpteen GOP Committee hearings we have lived thru for the last decade were for? Even McCarthy mistakenly admitted that, Jordan, Meadows, Nunes, Fox TV are still attempting to keep it alive
Click to expand...

seal_dem_party.jpg
 
“To maintain that a sitting president cannot be indicted, and then to withhold evidence of wrongdoing from Congress because the president cannot be charged, is to convert D.O.J. policy into the means for a cover-up,” he said before the House approved its nonbinding resolution to disclose the special counsel’s findings.""- Nadler quoted in NYT
 
Sailor said:
I am going to apologize Christie. You are right here. She personally did not call out for the impeachment of Trump. I stand corrected. I got her confused with just about every other Democrat politician calling for his impeachment.
Click to expand...

Thanks, no problem. I just wondered if I missed something lol.
 
Sailor said:
I am going to apologize Christie. You are right here. She personally did not call out for the impeachment of Trump. I stand corrected. I got her confused with just about every other Democrat politician calling for his impeachment.
Click to expand...

I think it's nice that you are going to apologize. So, when is that going to happen?
 
Micawber said:
“To maintain that a sitting president cannot be indicted, and then to withhold evidence of wrongdoing from Congress because the president cannot be charged, is to convert D.O.J. policy into the means for a cover-up,” he said before the House approved its nonbinding resolution to disclose the special counsel’s findings.""- Nadler quoted in NYT
Click to expand...

seal_dem_party.jpg
 
archives said:
Not at all, Pelosi is the politician, she plays the game better than anyone, Trump can tell you that, her call to slow down the impeachment talk is all political, no need, the House investigation Committees will keep the Trump innuendos alive for years
Click to expand...

Because that's all they have.

:truestory:
 
Sailor said:
I am going to apologize Christie. You are right here. She personally did not call out for the impeachment of Trump. I stand corrected. I got her confused with just about every other Democrat politician calling for his impeachment.
Click to expand...

It seems to be the newly-elected ones who jumped on the Impeach the Rotten Peach Train. Pelosi and the more senior (D)s are not in favor of it. She gave the reason that it "would divide the country," which I think is rather specious. It's more likely that they know that absent something truly even more heinous than what Twittler has already done, the Senate won't follow suit. Personally I think it would be a dumb move and that the (D)s need to focus more on getting stuff done for the country and making sure that the voters know that, and let the Tangerine Tyrant hang himself.
 
Impeachment is inevitable..the House can't control it's members -it's like them trying to turn down crack cocaine
 
volsrock said:
“The fact that there are NO further indictments tells you everything you need to know”
Click to expand...
it tells you there is no criminal conspiracy ( desipte Brennan's yearning), and we know there is no Russian collusion.
It's a 2 year in the making nothing burger
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It seems to be the newly-elected ones who jumped on the Impeach the Rotten Peach Train. Pelosi and the more senior (D)s are not in favor of it. She gave the reason that it "would divide the country," which I think is rather specious. It's more likely that they know that absent something truly even more heinous than what Twittler has already done, the Senate won't follow suit. Personally I think it would be a dumb move and that the (D)s need to focus more on getting stuff done for the country and making sure that the voters know that, and let the Tangerine Tyrant hang himself.
Click to expand...

Democrats divided the country for over two years on a pointless collusion fantasy so it’s a little late for Pelosi to worry about ‘dividing the country’.

Which actually translates into ‘we ain’t go nothing’ to impeach him with.
 
archives said:
How could it be a witch hunt when he already has like five guilty pleas and three convictions from top Trump officials plus an additional thirty something indictments still in the legal system? In comparison, Conservatives investigated for a decade and didn't come up with nothing, zero, zilch

And America isn't getting tired of it all, actually, given the past decade, the GOP has set the theme and precedent that Congress investigates everything, if at all, America has grown apathetic, meaning it will continue without any political consequences to the Democrats. Trump has created a reality TV environment in politics, so it is all expected
Click to expand...
No. Mueller isn't just some more House fishing exhibitions that barely get mention.
This is the Big Kahuna of Trump being a 'Russian asset' - the American people have been
bludgeoned with this crap for 2 years.

There's gonna be some narrative sliming by Mueller -but the people aren't going to be fooled,
and depending the degree of TDS exhibited by the Dems the next 2 years will clarity that witch hunt
 
archives said:
Not at all, Pelosi is the politician, she plays the game better than anyone, Trump can tell you that, her call to slow down the impeachment talk is all political, no need, the House investigation Committees will keep the Trump innuendos alive for years
Click to expand...
bingo. correct. The Dems will continue to look stupid.
Voters will notice they don't do problem solving just endless fishing expeditions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top