My hope for Is it huge win, so the insurrectionists willshut the F up!

[Stone]

Trump’s monitors are for intimidation, not observation.

And you heard this where? The Daily kos?

 

[ZenMode]

Americans aren't exactly united in their confidence in our election process.

Thanks mainly to the president spreading baseless lies.

In both elections, monitors are observing a tiny fraction of polling locations. We're talking roughly one monitor for every 178 precincts.

The hypocrisy is hilarious as apparently having people observe elections is now a threat to the elections? DERP DERP DERPITY DERP

Again, the most ever monitors in a mid-term. Speaks for itself.

 

[zymurgy]

Thanks mainly to the president spreading baseless lies.

you are literally questioning and spreading election lies here

Again, the most ever monitors in a mid-term. Speaks for itself.

we don't elect kings. a mid term still has senators being elected - an equal branch.

your zeal to make this be a lesser election is stupid. We have the same basic number of precincts to monitor.

 

[ZenMode]

you are literally questioning and spreading election lies here

Nobody cares what I have to say. It's a LOT different when the President spreads lies.

we don't elect kings. a mid term still has senators being elected - an equal branch.

your zeal to make this be a lesser election is stupid. We have the same basic number of precincts to monitor.

It is a lesser election.

 

[zymurgy]

Nobody cares what I have to say. It's a LOT different when the President spreads lies.

It is a lesser election.

So free speech is only acceptable when the person speaking is inconsequential? That has to be one of the most idiotic things you've posted here, and that bar is extraordinarily high.

And apparently midterms are "lesser elections." So by that logic, what's the big deal if voters are intimidated? It's only a lesser election, right?

 

[ZenMode]

So free speech is only acceptable when the person speaking is inconsequential? That has to be one of the most idiotic things you've posted here, and that bar is extraordinarily high.

Since I never said it, it's actually one of the most idiotic things YOU'VE posted here.

And apparently midterms are "lesser elections." So by that logic, what's the big deal if voters are intimidated? It's only a lesser election, right?

They are lesser elections. Turnout is generally higher for presidential elections.

 

[zymurgy]

Since I never said it, it's actually one of the most idiotic things YOU'VE posted here.

You implied it. ("Nobody cares what I have to say. It's a LOT different when the President spreads lies.")

So your defense is that you can spread election lies because you're an inconsequential nobody, but the President can't because people actually listen to him?

That's a weird defense. "I'm a loser, therefore I get to lie." Quite the argument.

I agree with much of it though. you are quite the loser

They are lesser elections. Turnout is generally higher for presidential elections.

And now "lesser election" apparently just means lower turnout.

Does lower turnout make those votes less important? Less deserving of protection? Less worthy of monitoring?

 

[ZenMode]

You implied it. ("Nobody cares what I have to say. It's a LOT different when the President spreads lies.")

Correct. It's horribly irresponsible for the President to spread lies, especially about something as significant as elections.

So your defense is that you can spread election lies because you're an inconsequential nobody, but the President can't because people actually listen to him?

To whatever degree I'm lying, which isn't any, yes.

That's a weird defense. "I'm a loser, therefore I get to lie." Quite the argument.

Again, the fact that presidential elections are bigger and more significant isn't opinion.

I agree with much of it though. you are quite the loser


And now "lesser election" apparently just means lower turnout.

Presidential elections have larger turnout than mid-terms, yes.

Does lower turnout make those votes less important?

Nope and never said they did.

Less deserving of protection? Less worthy of monitoring?

Again, it's the reason for all the monitors that's the issue.

 

[Crepitus]

You can't blame the Democrat rioting, looting, vandalism, arson, supporting organized crime, harboring illegal aliens, assaults, and murder and assassinations on Trump, stooge.

Inversion fallacy.

You're babbling Larry. Get it together.

 

[Crepitus]

So he was born in 1938?

Not sure, I think he had to repeat preschool few times before they let him go to kindergarten.

 

[In the Night]

Thanks mainly to the president spreading baseless lies.

You cannot blame Democrat election fraud on Trump, moron. Inversion fallacy.

Again, the most ever monitors in a mid-term. Speaks for itself.

Yes it does. Glad they are there.

 

[In the Night]

Nobody cares what I have to say.

So you are a nobody. Gotit.

It's a LOT different when the President spreads lies.

You cannot blame your lies on Trump.

It is a lesser election.

Less than what, Void?

 

[In the Night]

Since I never said it, it's actually one of the most idiotic things YOU'VE posted here.

They are lesser elections. Turnout is generally higher for presidential elections.

You cannot blame your idiocy on anybody else, Void.

Less than what, Void?

 

[Tbird19482]

Not sure, I think he had to repeat preschool few times before they let him go to kindergarten.

I think he may have been 17 before they let him out of Kindergarten because as we can see he still doesn't play well with others.

 

[ZenMode]

Yes it does. Glad they are there.

Because you're an uninformed, conspiracy theorist.

 

[ZenMode]

First black, female Dem governor in GA.

Thanks Orange Jesus.

 

[In the Night]

Because you're an uninformed, conspiracy theorist.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is no threory.

 

[ZenMode]

Voters are Rodney King-ing the Republican Party

 

[Nordberg]

And you heard this where? The Daily kos?

What is to observe? Our personal vote is secret. Intimidation is all thay have.

 

[Cypress]

Maybe you WON'T take the house....

NBC projects that Democrats will ultimately have an 83-seat majority in the House, 259 seats to 176 seats.