cancel2 2022
Canceled
.
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Last edited:
You thought that there wasn't a coalition for Libya & that Congress couldn't investigate. Forgive me if I don't see you as an expert on Islamic radicalism.
I think that's an issue w/ sites like this in general. Most here know a little about a lot, but not everything about everything, even though they like to pretend that they do. I don't claim to be an expert on Islam or Islamic radicalism, but I know the psychology of extremists in general, and I can work %'s out in my head to draw basic conclusions.
Maybe William Gladstone and John Quincy Adams were right?
![]()
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
It astounds me that people can be perplexed about the subject when the radicals plainly state what their objectives are.
You don't believe them?
There are many like that I'm afraid, the truth is hidden in plain sight but they can't see it.It astounds me that people can be perplexed about the subject when the radicals plainly state what their objectives are.
You don't believe them?
Well yes you definitely ought to be far more humble, hubris is not for you!And upon conceding yet another point, Tommy once more decides to highlight the weakness of his point by once again resorting to a petty outburst of derision.
I humbly accept your concession.
![]()
I'd disagree w/ that. The OT has a lot of justifications for violence & inequality for anyone who wants to warp & twist what the religion is about. Those who try to tie Islam to violence usually reference the verse about killing infidels, which is very specific to an historic situation & war, and used the same way by extremists.
You bigoted piece of socialist, white aryan nation worshiping, shit. The OT is the TORAH, the Jewish Bible. And like a typical socialist democrat KKK pos, you try to blame everyting on the Jews, you Israel hating, cunt!
CockSucker has his ire up...
LOL
Don't you have some crosses to desecrate, Bukaki Girl?
Al-Baghdadi is an Islamic scholar by any measure.
The Secret Life of ISIS Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
The biggest threat to Middle East security is as much a mystery as a menace — a 42-year-old Iraqi who went from a U.S. detention camp to the top of the jihadist universe with a whisper of a backstory and a $10 million bounty on his head.
His biometrics may have been cataloged by the soldiers who kept him locked up at Camp Bucca in Iraq — where he was recalled as "savvy" but not particularly dangerous — but few details about his life and insurgent career have been nailed down.
They know physically who this guy is, but his backstory is just myth," said Patrick Skinner of the Soufan Group, a security consulting firm.
Jihadist propaganda has painted him as an imam from a religious family descended from noble tribes, and a scholar and a poet with a Ph.D. from Baghdad's Islamic University, possibly in Arabic.
Whatever happens, Skinner said he's likely to remain an enigma.
"No one knows anything about him," he said. "He can be a Robin Hood. He could be Dr. Evil. It's very hard to fight a myth."
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/iraq-turmoil/secret-life-isis-leader-abu-bakr-al-baghdadi-n132311
Don't you have some cocks to suck, CockSucker?

No. As I said, I think they use the religion as a crutch for their geo-political agenda.
Look at history. Did Stalin really believe in Communism? But he came out and stated that's what his objective was! Sure thing - how ever could we doubt his words at face value?
Would you please stop spreading Daesh propaganda?
His backstory is a myth, probably intended to help in recruiting. If this guy was an accomplished and respected Islamic Scholar, our intelligence services would know about it. My guess? He is a two bit punk, with delusions of grandeur, and political goals involving the acquisition of power and influence under the guise of the Islamic religion. The fact that you were so easily duped into thinking he is a respected scholar only further illuminates your anti-Islamic bias and your readiness to unquestioningly accept the worst assumptions about that faith.
I've explained now dozens of times that salafi jihad is an out outgrowth of salafi Islam, which is an interpretationWho are you to say what their core reason is? Those on the outside say they're just perverting the religion for a political agenda.
Again, you seem determined to believe what you want to believe about it. You can say that the reason for their existence is Islam all day - but they're really lunatics who are using the religion as a crutch, and nothing more. Ultimately, they're no different from the KKK in that respect, or even the Phelps crowd - who clearly DO use the Bible to justify their warped views.
You get into a very slippery slope w/ this stuff, and to me, it's a perfect example of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing. What your rhetoric ultimately does is make it safe for those who DO want to make it about Islam to continue to do so.
I've explained now dozens of times that salafi jihad is an out outgrowth of salafi Islam, which is an interpretation
( not technically a sect) of Sunni Islam.
You continuously either do not address this,or perhaps you simply do not understand it.
It's not "rhetoric" it's not a "little understanding" -it's how terrorism is discussed.
It's what the rebels in Syria call each other "takfir". The very word "jihadi" is an Islamic term.
The west did not make these up.
It bubbles up thru the madrasses in Pakistan, it's how the Taliban was created -
children of the mujahideen..etc..
If you cannot see how salafi Islam ( and not all of Islam) is the prime carrier of this disease,
then you are simply not opening your eyes.
Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim al-Badri, otherwise known as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was born in 1971 in Samarra, Iraq, to a lower-middle class Sunni family.Your source speculates that Al Baghdadi isn't a Muslim scholar---sans any evidence
Yup.
If you agree w/ that, then why is most of your previous response about Islam in general?
I've explained now dozens of times that salafi jihad is an out outgrowth of salafi Islam, which is an interpretation
( not technically a sect) of Sunni Islam.
You continuously either do not address this,or perhaps you simply do not understand it.
It's not "rhetoric" it's not a "little understanding" -it's how terrorism is discussed.
It's what the rebels in Syria call each other "takfir". The very word "jihadi" is an Islamic term.
The west did not make these up.
It bubbles up thru the madrasses in Pakistan, it's how the Taliban was created -
children of the mujahideen..etc..
If you cannot see how salafi Islam ( and not all of Islam) is the prime carrier of this disease,
then you are simply not opening your eyes.