My sig

Not sure what the point of the question is. I don't really know.

But can you answer my question....or is that too difficult?

Easy, you’ll just deny the answer.

The Coup lawyer was a critical player in the first coup..err I mean impeachment attempt. Funny how that worked, huh?
 
Easy, you’ll just deny the answer.

The Coup lawyer was a critical player in the first coup..err I mean impeachment attempt. Funny how that worked, huh?

So, there was no insurrection in your argument about "citing an insurrection?"

Makes sense. Thanks....great thread.
 
So, there was no insurrection in your argument about "citing an insurrection?"

Makes sense. Thanks....great thread.

Well, there hasn’t actually been an insurrection lol.

So we don’t have one one to discuss. The point is the Coup Lawyer was involved in the first failed attempt at removing a duly elected President.

And it’s ‘water under the bridge’ ‘nothing to see here’.
 
Dems had embarked on a bizarre, three-year litany of dreaming of impeachment, the emoluments clause, the Logan Act, the 25th Amendment, fake FISA abuse, "Russian collusion" the Mueller special-counsel investigation, Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti, Trump’s tax returns, White Supremacy!, Recession! Russian oligarchs! Whistle Blower! Impeachment & Aquittal! — and Lord knows what next -WAIT Impeachment again!
 
Well, there hasn’t actually been an insurrection lol.

So we don’t have one one to discuss. The point is the Coup Lawyer was involved in the first failed attempt at removing a duly elected President.

And it’s ‘water under the bridge’ ‘nothing to see here’.

You said "inciting insurrection" in the OP.
 
Hello Darth,

Well, there hasn’t actually been an insurrection lol.

So we don’t have one one to discuss. The point is the Coup Lawyer was involved in the first failed attempt at removing a duly elected President.

And it’s ‘water under the bridge’ ‘nothing to see here’.

Are all impeachments 'attempts to remove a duly elected president?'

Or just the ones against Trump...
 
Hello Darth,



Are all impeachments 'attempts to remove a duly elected president?'

Or just the ones against Trump...

The point with Non-novel impeachments is to remove a sitting president.

Since China gave us the novel China virus it’s only fitting democrats would give us the novel impeachment.
 
The point with Non-novel impeachments is to remove a sitting president.

Since China gave us the novel China virus it’s only fitting democrats would give us the novel impeachment.

Dont forget the 6 R Senators who voted to conduct this unconstitutional act.
 
the Romney Bunch..weasels R us

That the legacy R's have been cucks for the Left is their second worst betrayal after their constant lying.....after they constantly telling us how right and honorable they are.

Complete frauds they are, no better that the Left in many ways.
 
I am sorry, but after reading through the entire thread, I have determined this thread to be a huge failure, so therefore I must give it my official THREAD FAILED disapproval stamp!

Why does Darth Omar have so many of these thread failures?

thread-fail.jpeg


It's a tough job- BUT SOMEBODY HAS TO DO IT!
 
I am sorry, but after reading through the entire thread, I have determined this thread to be a huge failure, so therefore I must give it my official THREAD FAILED disapproval stamp!

Why does Darth Omar have so many of these thread failures?

thread-fail.jpeg


It's a tough job- BUT SOMEBODY HAS TO DO IT!

There is no ground for assuming that the idea in the OP was a poor one, the much more likely explanation is that the JPP membership failed to support the OP.
 
Great, but the Revolution is going to make sure that R's are at least out of power going forwards, they hope to make R ideas illegal and unspeakable.

TYRANNY IS HERE

I could be wrong but I think there’s an expiration date on some of the totalitarian stuff.
 
I could be wrong but I think there’s an expiration date on some of the totalitarian stuff.

They have been planning for 50ish years, they know power inside and out....how to get it.....how to keep it....and they not only dont mind at all abusing their fellow Americans but it sure looks like they get off on it.....they fantasize that they are better than us.

You are probably wrong.
 
There is no ground for assuming that the idea in the OP was a poor one, the much more likely explanation is that the JPP membership failed to support the OP.

I am still waiting for Darth to explain what Mark Zaid has to do with Donald Trump's 2nd Impeachment or anything else?

Total thread fail!
 
Back
Top