๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—™๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ถ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ...

Chief is correct about him having a permit but the Chief has no idea if he had it on him. The Minneapolis police did not investigate the shooting. But as I said even if he had his ID on him (he didn't) he was committing a crime by stalking ICE and harassing them. He was also obstructing justice. It is ILLEGAL to carry a weapon while committing a crime. PRETTI was ILLEGALLY carrying a gun and it got him killed.
HAHAHAHAA.\

The "Police Chief has no idea... because they did not investigate the shooting"

but you can state definitively over and over "he did not have ID on him" because apparently 'you did investigate the shooting"????


FLOL, that you cannot see what a joke of a poster you are to all of us as you not only refute your own posts but expose your idiocy in doing so.

He did not obstruct justice and he did not stalk them, just more lies by you. As a citizen, in the true REPUBLICAN vein from decades past, he set out to properly witness and document what he believed was big govt over reach and abuse. SOmething prior Republicans spoke a ton about and believed it was a civic duty to do what he did.

We understand Magats think the big gov't must be obeyed and never challenged and no one should try to document or film any abuses but those of us, not magats, will not go along with that.
 
Pretti was not "legally armed"

1. To legally carry a gun you must have your state issued ID on you. And must have your concealed carry permit on you. Pretti had neither.
2. Pretti was stalking ICE agents and obstructing justice while carrying a gun. It is illegal to carry a gun during the commission of a crime.

The two agents KILLED Pretti there has been no determination of murder.
Thy likely "disappeared" it.
 
HAHAHAHAA.\

The "Police Chief has no idea... because they did not investigate the shooting"

but you can state definitively over and over "he did not have ID on him" because apparently 'you did investigate the shooting"????


FLOL, that you cannot see what a joke of a poster you are to all of us as you not only refute your own posts but expose your idiocy in doing so.

He did not obstruct justice and he did not stalk them, just more lies by you. As a citizen, in the true REPUBLICAN vein from decades past, he set out to properly witness and document what he believed was big govt over reach and abuse. SOmething prior Republicans spoke a ton about and believed it was a civic duty to do what he did.

We understand Magats think the big gov't must be obeyed and never challenged and no one should try to document or film any abuses but those of us, not magats, will not go along with that.
He stalked ICE using the internet then harassed them by blowing his car horn and tweeting his little whistle. Using the internet to stalk and harass ANYONE is a felony. Carrying a gun while committing a felony is another FELONY. Obstructing a Federal LEO from doing his job is a FELONY. Putting your hands on a Federal LEO during a fight is a FELONY. Resisting arrest is another crime. Pretti was not legally carrying a weapon.
 
He stalked ICE using the internet then harassed them by blowing his car horn and tweeting his little whistle. Using the internet to stalk and harass ANYONE is a felony. Carrying a gun while committing a felony is another FELONY. Obstructing a Federal LEO from doing his job is a FELONY. Putting your hands on a Federal LEO during a fight is a FELONY. Resisting arrest is another crime. Pretti was not legally carrying a weapon.
^ All lies. Each and every claim.

And once again Fastlane immediately goes back to saying 'he investigated the crime and thus can say definatively he was not carrying ID'.

Imagine how stupid he is. Fastlane says the Police Chief did not investigate the scene but he is claiming he, Fastlane did investigate the scene.


No more need be said than to point and laugh at that idiocy.
 
^ All lies. Each and every claim.

And once again Fastlane immediately goes back to saying 'he investigated the crime and thus can say definatively he was not carrying ID'.

Imagine how stupid he is. Fastlane says the Police Chief did not investigate the scene but he is claiming he, Fastlane did investigate the scene.


No more need be said than to point and laugh at that idiocy.
I didn't investigate the shooting but neither did the Minneapolis police. The Feds investigated it and they say he didn't have his ID or gun CC License on him. So STFU Queer Person. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
I didn't investigate the shooting the feds but neither did the Minneapolis police. The Feds investigated it and they say he didn't have his ID or gun CC License on him. So STFU Queer Person. :laugh:
And yet you keep representing that you did investigate it. You keep lying.

You keep saying "he did not have ID" when your own criteria for having that information, for the Police Chief, is that he must investigate the scene to be able to say whether he had ID or not.


So you are lying. You want us to believe you investigated the scene or you would follow your own statement with "Fastlane cannot say that as he did not investigate the scene'.

So stop lying. No one believes you investigated the scene
 
And yet you keep representing that you did investigate it. You keep lying.

You keep saying "he did not have ID" when your own criteria for having that information, for the Police Chief, is that he must investigate the scene to be able to say that.


So you are lying. You want us to believe you investigated the scene or you would follow your own statement with "Fastlane cannot say that as he did not investigate the scene'.

So stop lying. No one believes you investigated the scene
I did??? Show me where. You seem to be hallucinating again. You are mentally challenged. Really really challenged.
 
Nah, they've already determined that's not illegal.

18 U.S. Code ยง 2261A - Stalking

(2)with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of conduct thatโ€”
 
Last edited:
Exactly. Toxic,, who thinks she knows everything, imagines Babbitt as a lone woman climbing through the broken window. She is too stupid to visualize the reality -- a screaming, roiling, armed mob who had already beaten dozens of officers, the noise, the chaos, and a few seconds for Byrd to act to protect the members of the government under attack.

A hell of a lot different than a lone guy with a cell phone in his hand.
Toxic has the "logic" of a 5 year old
 
Back
Top