Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!
- Thread starter Bill
- Start date
This
Nope.
Earl only posts what he heard on Fox Entertainment.
That way he knows he will always be right....
He should be better informed living under legions sac...... Earl found him a home.
That wasn't his directive.
The problem is that you are talking out of your ass about a report you haven't read, and legislation you haven't reviewed.
The scope of what the Special Counsel could do was limited by the legislation, which you haven't read.
So now, you're just making it all up as you go.
That is why impeachment proceedings will destroy Conservatism...none of you have coherent arguments here, and the minute you get caught lying about it, the whole fucking defense falls apart. Witness this thread.
He literally said that OLC guidelines say you cannot indict a sitting President.
Literally.
Lit-er-a-lly.
Do you know what "literally" means?
We know you're functionally illiterate, so probably not.
How so?
Trump's base was already galvanized in 2016 when he lost the popular vote by 3,000,000.
Trump's base was already galvanized in 2018 when the GOP lost the vote in the House by 10,000,000 and the vote in the Senate by 20,000,000.
Trump's base was already galvanized when Democrats clawed back over 400 State legislative seats since 2017.
Trump's base is dwindling; I doubt he even gets to 60,000,000 votes if he's still running for President next year.
The mandate of his Special Counsel wasn't to do that.
You would know that if you read the legislation that established the SC.
But you prefer the strategy of repeating the same stupid, lying bullshit over and over because that's what Nazis do.
But it doesn't matter if Mueller indicted or not; it's in Congress' hands now and impeachment proceedings would be the end of Trump and the GOP, because you couldn't make these arguments amid the evidence presented in Mueler's report; you'd have to reconcile what is in the report and you have yet to do that for anything detailed there.
You've been debating conceptually about the report, but what you have avoided debating are the contents of the report; specifrically the instances of obstruction and collusion detailed. Impeachment proceedings are going to force you to answer for those.
That scares the shit out of you because you have no answer for Paul Manafort sharing polling data with Russian spies in key states Trump won in 2016. You have no answer for the 11 instances of obstruction committed by Trump. You haven't even addressed them; instead, you've tried to gaslight the report so you don't have to address them.
What a fuckin' phony.
No, she knows the Senate will not convict him regardless of his criminality.
Stench is just another know nothing parrot.
Is that like the house voting to repeal the ACA 64 times under Obama even though they knew he would never sign it?
Did you expect anything different from Toothless, Trueless Darth LOL?
Poor SimpleFreak.
reagansghost
eternal
a whole new ballgame after this nasty McGhan tape release
shades of Watergate
shades of Watergate
And yet, Mueller could not bring himself to that statement. Once again for the dumb fucks:
NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Do you think this will be it, finally lol?
countryboy
Verified User
This is what the Democrat Party has become. The persecution of political rivals is what despotic regimes do.