Nothing like that exists in the report.
Getin is lying because she's desperate.
Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!
- Thread starter Bill
- Start date
Nothing like that exists in the report.
Getin is lying because she's desperate.
The hammer being "I can't recall" or "I plead the Fifth".
Getin the ring
Verified User
Southern Chicken
Verified User
All aboard the HOPE train! Let's just see what Mueller says to clarify his exact intended meaning in the report and not go on your assumptions of what Will happen in your fantasy.
And when Trump is gone and all the stupid shit he did is laid bare, you won't be able to disassociate from him the way you did from Bush the Dumber.
Why did Barr lie before the Senate in April when they asked him if he received any communication from Mueller about his summary of Mueller's report?
Why did Paul Manafort share polling data with Russian spies for months during the campaign and election?
Why did the White House Counsel reach out to Michael Flynn's lawyer when they learned of Flynn's cooperation with Mueller?
Why did Trump order Sessions and McGahn to fire Mueller, and then lie about making that order?
But you don't know that because you haven't read the report.
Also 34 other individuals and businesses were charged as a part of the investigation; as Mueller says, he didn't charge Trump because of OLC guidelines.
How do you explain Manafort sharing polling data with Russian spies for months?
How do you explain Trump's WH Counsel McGahn reaching out to Flynn after he learned that Flynn was cooperating with Mueller?
How do you explain Trump ordering Sessions and McGahn to fire Mueller?
These are all explanations that will have to be made should hearings and proceedings begin. What's your plan for this?
No you didn't.
None of you have answered for the actual instances of criminality detailed in the report; instead, you are trying to gaslight the report itself.
That's an obvious stalling tactic.
But it matters little because at some point, y'all are going to have to answer to what's in Mueller's report.
But you don't know if the case is weak because you refuse to read the report.
So your argument here is really circular and masturbatory.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
His plans should be to wait and listen to Mueller's testimony to explain it along with other questions in front of Congress, Emotional One.
How can you see the case is weak if you're refusing to read the report that makes the case?
You can't say it's weak if you haven't read it.
So what you're doing is repeating what others say because you're too lazy, stupid, or scared to do the work yourself.
What a leech.
No you didn't.
Really?
Then explain why Manafort shared polling data with Russian spies throughout the campaign and election?
Mueller is just going to repeat what's in his report, so you're still going to have to answer these questions:
Why did Manafort share polling data with Russian spies?
Why did McGahn reach out to Flynn's attorney about Flynn's cooperation with Mueller?
Why did Trump order Sessions to fire Mueller?
Why did Trump order McGahn to fire Mueller?
Why did Trump order his son to lie about the reason for the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower?
These questions are going to have to be answered by y'all if you want to defend Trump. Sure hope you have good explanations and not just the reactionary drivel we're accustomed to seeing from you clowns.
I broke this bot.
He's stuck repeating his mantra, which he'll repeat even as the ship sinks.
Consider this action as you torching your own lifeboat.
Why would Mueller be asked to explain why Manafort shared polling data with Russians? Shouldn't Manafort be asked to explain that?
Why would Mueller be asked to explain why McGahn called Flynn's lawyer after learning of Flynn's cooperation with Mueller? Shouldn't McGahn be asked to explain that?
Why would Mueller be asked to explain why Trump ordered Sessions to fire Mueller? Shouldn't Sessions or Trump explain that?
So why do you think Mueller will answer the questions as to why y'all did what you did?