Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!

Getin the ring said:
how about "who cares"?
is that a good answer.

you're beating dead dog, it's over cupcake

Democrats have a decision to make

lose because they push this impeachment crap instead of telling the American people some good policy ideas they have to present
or
lose because the economy is humming along and they don't want to do anything to help keep it going

I tell you what, we'll let you choose which :rofl2: you're a goof kid
Click to expand...

The problem for you is that no matter what, the questions as to why Trump obstructed justice and why his people colluded with Russia are not going to go away.

In fact, they will only become even more prominent in the election and campaigns so long as those questions go unanswered.

So why did Manafort share polling data with Russia?

Why did the WH Counsel reach out to Flynn after learning of his cooperation with Mueller?

No policy talk is ever going to happen so long as those questions go unanswered.
 
Unless the Botox cunt Pelosi actually moves forward posts about impeachment are irrelevant.

She is running out of time before the window closes for good

Take it to the bank
 
Southern Chicken said:
Was I there with Manafort? The fact is the report says "Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw
ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct
Click to expand...


You're not answering the question!

I didn't ask what the SC concluded, I am asking what you concluded based on what you read.

Your conclusion seems to be "I don't know."

So you don't know why Paul Manafort shared polling data with Russians?

Don't you think that's something you should know if you're going around claiming "no collusion"?

How can you claim there's "no collusion" if you don't know the reason why Manafort colluded with Russia by sharing polling data with them?

Again, you see how your entire argument is like Jenga...all I need to do is pull at one little block, and the whole fucking thing comes crashing down.
 
LV426 said:
45% of people polled care.

That's only 1% less than voted for Trump.

So why did you Conservatives collude with Russia, and why did Trump try to obstruct justice?
Click to expand...

again, no one cares but the same cupcakes that wouldn't vote for Trump even if he orchestrated true world peace and cured cancer,

the scoreboard still reads 305 to 226 nutty butty

unless you move that needle, and convince some deplorables to change their mind, you have to do this for 6 more years, are you up for it?
 
Southern Chicken said:
I done the same thing youre doing based on the redacted version...GUESS. See number #348
Click to expand...

I haven't done anything like that. I haven't misrepresented any conclusions like you have. I haven't avoided answering simple questions that identify the motive behind the actions.

So...what is the motive? Because that motive will establish whether or not collusion happened.

What was the motive for Manafort sharing polling data from PA, WI, MI, and MN with Russian spies?

That singular question gets to the heart of the "collusion" case, and the answer to that question is also the answer to whether or not Trump's team colluded with Russia to win the election.

So there's really no answer you can give, other than collusion, for Manafort doing what he did.
 
LV426 said:
What makes you think that? You're saying Paul Manafort was on the payroll of Russian spies as he was working on Trump's campaign?

So then "no one had any contact with Russia" is a big, fat lie, isn't it?

And since that is a lie, what else has Trump said that isn't true? What else have you Conservatives been saying that isn't true? You see how the sweater starts to unravel the minute we pull a thread when we get into the details?

This is just a G-rated, child-friendly preview of the obstacles facing you clowns in an impeachment.
Click to expand...

I am saying I don't know but I can guess and Mueller needs to testify before Congress on this inconclusive report.
 
The impeachment of Trump would put his crimes and transgression in front of the people. He is a horrible human being who has no respect for the law and thinks he can bully his way through anything. He has used a staff of lawyers to cheat people for generations. But he cannot outspend the government. The house investigations will reveal more crimes. The SDNY will show more.
You rightys do not care, but American voters may. Trump lost the last election by 3 million votes. He will not get that lucky again.
 
Darth Omar said:
Well, what are they waiting on lol?
Click to expand...

Instead of worrying about what others are doing, you should be worried about how you're going to defend Trump from what's in the Mueller report.

You haven't actually done that at all...you've avoided it.
 
LV426 said:
I haven't done anything like that. I haven't misrepresented any conclusions like you have. I haven't avoided answering simple questions that identify the motive behind the actions.

So...what is the motive? Because that motive will establish whether or not collusion happened.

What was the motive for Manafort sharing polling data from PA, WI, MI, and MN with Russian spies?

That singular question gets to the heart of the "collusion" case, and the answer to that question is also the answer to whether or not Trump's team colluded with Russia to win the election.

So there's really no answer you can give, other than collusion, for Manafort doing what he did.
Click to expand...

The report said inconclusive. What part of there were no opinions given one way or the other in the report don't you understand? It also says that Trump, in response to written questions from Mueller, said he had no knowledge of the transfer of internal polling results.

Mueller needs to testify to Congress.
 
Gonzomin said:
The impeachment of Trump would put his crimes and transgression in front of the people. He is a horrible human being who has no respect for the law and thinks he can bully his way through anything. He has used a staff of lawyers to cheat people for generations. But he cannot outspend the government. The house investigations will reveal more crimes. The SDNY will show more.
You rightys do not care, but American voters may. Trump lost the last election by 3 million votes. He will not get that lucky again.
Click to expand...

Another one on the HOPE train.
 
LV426 said:
Well you should probably know, otherwise you can't legitimately make a "no collusion" case if you don't know the reason why Manafort shared polling data with Russian spies.
Click to expand...

And neither can you legitimately say there was collusion according to the redacted Mueller report. Again it was inconclusive.
 
Southern Chicken said:
The report said inconclusive.
Click to expand...

Right, because Manafort didn't reveal his motivation yet.

But just because the report doesn't conclude it, doesn't mean it won't get asked again and again and again.

"Inconclusive" indicates that more questions will need to be asked; specifically the questions I've been asking. That's why Mueller said it was "inconclusive"...he couldn't get an answer as to why.

At a very early point "I don't know" is going to wear quite thin with everyone, mostly because the evidence is so overwhelming that he colluded that the professed ignorance really borders on bad faith.

You know exactly why Manafort shared polling data with Russian spies, because the answer is obvious to anyone who read the Mueller Report.
 
LV426 said:
Not only does Mueller need to testify, but so do Hope Hicks and Don McGahn.

Both Hicks and McGahn have been told not to testify by Trump (which itself is also an instance of obstruction).
Click to expand...

Let them start with Mueller, since it was his report that is causing additional questions.
 
Southern Chicken said:
It also says that Trump, in response to written questions from Mueller, said he had no knowledge of the transfer of internal polling results.
Click to expand...

First of all, Trump is a liar, so I don't know why you would believe him there.

Secondly, moving the bar on whether Trump knew about it doesn't change the fact that Manafort did it on Trump's behalf.

So "no contact with Russia" was a lie, wasn't it?

So since "no contact with Russia" was a lie, isn't it possible Trump is also lying when he said he had no knowledge of the polling transfer?
 
Southern Chicken said:
And neither can you legitimately say there was collusion according to the redacted Mueller report.
Click to expand...

Of course there was collusion; Manafort shared GOP polling data from PA, WI, MI, and MN with Russian spies connected to the IRA, which was targeting voters in those states on social media.

Why would Manafort do that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top