Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!

Right, because Manafort didn't reveal his motivation yet.

But just because the report doesn't conclude it, doesn't mean it won't get asked again and again and again.

"Inconclusive" indicates that more questions will need to be asked; specifically the questions I've been asking. That's why Mueller said it was "inconclusive"...he couldn't get an answer as to why.

At a very early point "I don't know" is going to wear quite thin with everyone, mostly because the evidence is so overwhelming that he colluded that the professed ignorance really borders on bad faith.

You know exactly why Manafort shared polling data with Russian spies, because the answer is obvious to anyone who read the Mueller Report.

Are you on medication? I said Mueller should testify before Congress. He should answer questions.

I don't know Exactly and neither do you. But you can keep living in your HOPE and fantasies about Conservatives and our genitalia. The report was inconclusive is the fact!
 
Last edited:
And neither can you legitimately say there was collusion according to the redacted Mueller report. Again it was inconclusive.
Manafort and others lying, destruction of evidence, lack of being able to speak with Russians, written answers from Trump, no wonder it was inconclusive.
 
Of course there was collusion; Manafort shared GOP polling data from PA, WI, MI, and MN with Russian spies connected to the IRA, which was targeting voters in those states on social media.

Why would Manafort do that?

Does Mueller state that in the report? That Trump administration colluded with Russia. If so, where does he state that specifically. I can show you where Mueller documented his actions. Guess what Mueller said in the report about the actions-
"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw
ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct.
The evidence we obtained about the
President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were
making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a
thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice,
we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach
that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a
crime, it also does not exonerate him."
 
Last edited:
I wondered who would be stupid enough to repeat that one of Trump's childish responses. Now I know.

It was in quotation marks, pende*o. President Trump is the president. The wicked witch of the West is only second in line to the presidency.

Now, take a hike.
 
First of all, Trump is a liar, so I don't know why you would believe him there.

Secondly, moving the bar on whether Trump knew about it doesn't change the fact that Manafort did it on Trump's behalf.

So "no contact with Russia" was a lie, wasn't it?

So since "no contact with Russia" was a lie, isn't it possible Trump is also lying when he said he had no knowledge of the polling transfer?

You can add "In my opinion" to all of the above.
 
He should answer questions.

Why?

He's not the one who took those actions.

You're the one defending them, though.

So that's why you have to answer for it.


I don't know Exactly and neither do you.

Of course you know why; Mueller says so in his report.:

They also discussed the status of the Trump Campaign and Manafort's strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states. Months before that meeting, Manafort had caused internal polling data to be shared with Kilimnik, and the sharing continued for some period of time after their August meeting.


But you can keep living in your HOPE and fantasies about Conservatives.

You guys are going to have to defend Trump and the GOP from what's in Mueller's report, and you're not doing a great job of that right now.
 
You can add "In my opinion" to all of the above.

It's not my opinion that Trump is a liar, it's fact.

He lied when he said "no contact with Russia".

YOU lied when you repeated that lie of his.

So since he lied about "no contact with Russia" why would he be telling the truth about his knowledge of Manafort colluding with Russia?
 
Why?

He's not the one who took those actions.

You're the one defending them, though.

So that's why you have to answer for it.




Of course you know why; Mueller says so in his report.:

They also discussed the status of the Trump Campaign and Manafort's strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states. Months before that meeting, Manafort had caused internal polling data to be shared with Kilimnik, and the sharing continued for some period of time after their August meeting.




You guys are going to have to defend Trump and the GOP from what's in Mueller's report, and you're not doing a great job of that right now.

He is the one that has the first hand information about it and why he included it in the report.
defending them or being factual about what the report states.
No I dont have to answer for and inconclusive report. Mueller does have to fill in some information.
Did the Trump administration get directly implicated on Manafort's activity? Does the report state this? Or does it state that it was inconclusive?
Defend Trump from what? and Inconclusive report?
 
It's not my opinion that Trump is a liar, it's fact.

He lied when he said "no contact with Russia".

YOU lied when you repeated that lie of his.

So since he lied about "no contact with Russia" why would he be telling the truth about his knowledge of Manafort colluding with Russia?

Then why dont YOU testify before congress about the report? I quoted the report. No lies were told by me.
 
Back
Top