Superfreak
Verified User
Again you dolt... yes Mueller doesn't have the power to investigate in other countries. But AGAIN, you continue claiming the data was definitely shared with Russia, despite NO evidence to back that up.
Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!
- Thread starter Bill
- Start date
Again you dolt... yes Mueller doesn't have the power to investigate in other countries. But AGAIN, you continue claiming the data was definitely shared with Russia, despite NO evidence to back that up.
But Mueller didn't agree with Barr's summary of Mueller's report and sent him two letters expressing exactly that.
When asked, Barr lied about those letters.
Mueller, 3/27: "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions."
Van Hollen, 4/20: “Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion?”
Barr, 4/20: “I don’t know whether Mueller supported my conclusion.”
Why did Barr lie on 4/20?
It's because news of Mueller's letters hadn't leaked yet, isn't it?
Superfreak
Verified User
Because they were working on the peace plan Kilimnik was proposing should Trump win? Showing him what they were anticipating in the close battle ground states? I don't know. You certainly don't know.
Van Hollen, 4/20: “Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion?”
Barr, 4/20: “I don’t know whether Mueller supported my conclusion.”
Fact is, Mueller didn't support it: "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions."
So Barr lied.
Superfreak
Verified User
I have not been inconsistent. You are just a moron.
But Barr did...and Mueller expressed his concern with Barr's conclusions twice.
Barr didn't reveal those concerns when asked on 4/20 because news of those letters hadn't leaked yet.
So Barr lied about Mueller on 4/20 because he thought he could get away with establishing his conclusions as representative of Mueller's when they weren't.
So he lied to lend his argument credibility that it didn't have; which is something you people do here all the fucking time.
WHY DID MANAFORT SHARE ANYTHING WITH KILIMNIK?
Who, the FBI also assesses, has ties to Russian intelligence.
You left that part out.
Why would Manafort share polling data with someone connected to Russian Intelligence?
Southern Chicken
Verified User
Are you now saying Mueller broke the OLC opinion but put into his reported that he couldn't? You can do better!
Southern Chicken
Verified User
I thought you said the OLC opinion didn't allow Mueller to have an opinion or conclusion.
NOPE.
So that doesn't mean "no evidence exists".
Evidence could exist; Mueller's team was limited in its ability to collect that evidence just like Mueller says in his report that you have yet to read.
So why do you continue only posting half truths here?
The part I quoted states that Mueller's team was limited in its ability to get evidence about this.
That's different from saying "no evidence exists", and you know that.
So you're arguing sophistry here, why? It's an ego thing, isn't it?
You don't want to admit you got conned because of what it means for your credibility and presence on these boards.
Southern Chicken
Verified User
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/mind-reading
How much do you charge and can I get a refund?
Look man...you're the one who keeps moving the bar, redefining what you meant, changing your entire position as more evidence comes in showing you got taken for a ride.
AH!
So then evidence could exist, it's just that Mueller had no way of getting it.
But that doesn't answer why Manafort shared polling data with them in the first place???
So that's collusion then!
You just made the argument that Trump's campaign colluded with Russia!
Wow. Way to step in it.
LOL!
He didn't merely "show it" to Kilimnik...he passed it along to him for months by himself or via Rick Gates...you know...like the Mueller report (that you have yet to read) says!
Why was he showing it to Kilimnik in the first place? What does Kilimnik have to do with polls in PA?
Sure didn’t dumbshit. It merely prevented him from indicting.
So your argument is that Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik, who is assessed to have ties to Russian intelligence, for months because of a peace plan they had worked out that would happen if Trump won?
That's collusion.