Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!

domer76 said:
Nope, illiterate fuckwad.

10 conclusions.

FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION”


A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
Click to expand...

Those are not conclusions dummy.

"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw
ultimate conclusions about the President ' s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the
President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were
making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a
thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice,
we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach
that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a
crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Did YOU read the report? States it right here. Better yet, did you understand it? And LV thank this.... you both can do better!
 
Last edited:
LV426 said:
So that's why Manafort shared polling data with him?
Click to expand...

I have already answered your question. They worked together for ten years. There could be numerous reasons. I can speculate, but I do not know. Neither do you. Yet you continue to lie and pretend you know for a fact the data was shared with Russians.
 
Superfreak said:
Kilimnik was an informant FOR the FBI.
Click to expand...

And was also a Russian asset, tied to the IRA and FSB, per the FBI.

It's possible he was playing both sides.

Also, none of this explains why Manafort shared polling data with him for months.

Why did he do that?
 
Superfreak said:
The 34 people and businesses, how many were Americans? How many Americans were indicted for collusion/conspiracy?
Click to expand...

Well, since Collusion isn't an actual legal charge, none. And that's the crux of your argument; that collusion isn't illegal, so it's OK for Manafort to have colluded with Russia.
 
Southern Chicken said:
Those are not conclusions dummy.

"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw
ultimate conclusions about the President ' s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the
President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were
making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a
thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice,
we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach
that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a
crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Did YOU read the report? Better yet, did you understand it?
Click to expand...

Sure have, stupid fuck. Obviously, you haven’t.

At the same time, if we had confidence after a
thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice,
we would so state
 
LV426 said:
And was also a Russian asset, tied to the IRA and FSB, per the FBI.

It's possible he was playing both sides.

Also, none of this explains why Manafort shared polling data with him for months.

Why did he do that?
Click to expand...

With TIES to them. Guess what genius... if he is an informant, he has to have ties to them. Otherwise he has nothing of value to report.

Again moron... HAVING ties is not the same as giving those ties information.
 
LV426 said:
Well, since Collusion isn't an actual legal charge, none. And that's the crux of your argument; that collusion isn't illegal, so it's OK for Manafort to have colluded with Russia.
Click to expand...

I also stated conspiracy moron. Why did you leave that out? Oh yeah, so you could run away from answering the question.
 
LV426 said:
So did he share polling data with everyone else he worked with for 10 years? Or just this guy?
Click to expand...

Have you seen any EVIDENCE (I know you don't know what that word means, so maybe look it up this time and learn?) that he shared with anyone else?
 
LV426 said:
Except for the 10 instances laid out in the Mueller report, to which you have yet to address because you haven't read the report and you never will.




Except for Paul Manafort sharing polling data with Russian spies for months when he was campaign manager.




They sure are, and it's a fact Paul Manafort shared polling data with Russian spies while campaign manager.

It's also a fact that Trump tried to have Mueller fired by McGahn.

It's also a fact that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie about the Moscow Project.

It's also a fact that Trump fired Comey "because of Russia."

It's also a fact that Barr lied before the Senate on April 20th when he said he didn't know if Mueller disagreed with his conclusions.

It's also a fact that other than the DOJ spokesperson, no one else can corroborate this account of Barr's where Mueller said he was OK with what Barr concluded.

It's also a fact that Trump's counsel reached out to Michael Flynn once they learned he was cooperating with Mueller.

These are all facts that will have to be answered for at some point.

Better get crackin' on explanations for these things now, because they're not going to go away.
Click to expand...


And only 14% of the House believes you. WHere is that growing number of members of the house that supports your fantasy?
 
Superfreak said:
Yet you continue to lie and pretend you know for a fact the data was shared with Russians.
Click to expand...

Kilimink is assessed to have ties to Russian intelligence.

So that means he's compromised by Russia, so whatever he knows, whatever he gets, they know and they get.

That's how espionage works.

Now, why did Manafort share that polling data with him?

Before, you said it was because of the peace plan...but in the last post, you said you didn't know.

So that's another example of your inconsistency, and why you lack credibility.

You were so certain before that it was because of this "peace plan", but then you hedged that in the last post when you said you didn't know.

So...you were bullshitting before, when you said he shared polling data from PA, MI, WI, and MN because of a "peace plan", weren't you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top