“Navy considers major aircraft carrier revamp to better suit Trump’s aesthetic”

archives said:

Trump wants to make major structural changes because he doesn’t like the looks of the modern Navy carriers, he wants a more less efficient WWII looking vessel

You can’t make this up, this is the President of the country, one stuck in a war he started and he can’t get out of, focused on the looks of Navy vessels

What’s left to say?
Click to expand...

Maybe the enemies will die laughing and we can save our ammo. lol

uNl38r3.jpg
 
archives said:

Trump wants to make major structural changes because he doesn’t like the looks of the modern Navy carriers, he wants a more less efficient WWII looking vessel

You can’t make this up, this is the President of the country, one stuck in a war he started and he can’t get out of, focused on the looks of Navy vessels

What’s left to say?
Click to expand...




"....... a former senior U.S. official familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity...."


More unsubstantiated liespeak from a usual source....
 
archives said:

Trump wants to make major structural changes because he doesn’t like the looks of the modern Navy carriers, he wants a more less efficient WWII looking vessel

You can’t make this up, this is the President of the country, one stuck in a war he started and he can’t get out of, focused on the looks of Navy vessels

What’s left to say?
Click to expand...
This is all a big waste of money but then again Trump has to do things bigger and better then any other President and that includes running up the national debt.
If you want a bigger national debt elect a Republican they will get it done.
Lets see Reagan almost tripled the debt , Bush over doubled it , Obama did but he had to get us out of a deep recession ,and economist say there is only two ways to get out of one , that is a war or spend your way out, well we didn't have a war so he spent our way out of it then Trump came in and really ran it up Donald Trump (first term) $8,081,116,233,570.88 39.7%
39.7%39.7%
Donald Trump (second term) $1,054,778,423,857.20 2.8%
2.8%2.8%
That's over 9 Trillion and still going.
Yep lets run that sucker up.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Buddha doesn't care about such things. That aside you stated: "and this coming from a guy who knows shit about the Navy” That is first person narrative if you ask me, which implies you are the "guy" who knows shit about the Navy. Maybe word things better next time. You left yourself open to sarcastic ridicule.

Trump, on the other hand, is a temporary thing. He's gone in a little over two years and somebody else will replace him. When he leaves office, the Left will totally forget about him, just like everybody else.
Click to expand...

There appears to be literally *nothing* your #FatFascistFelon can do or say that you won't defend. What's wrong with you?
 
Grokmaster said:
"....... a former senior U.S. official familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity...."


More unsubstantiated liespeak from a usual source....
Click to expand...

GROK...the poor deluded MAGA moron.

It was deluded, naive morons like GROK who put Hitler in power in mid-20th century Germany.
 
Cypress said:
We've already seen his 'engineering' and construction expertise on the reflecting pool fiasco.
Click to expand...

Excellent point. If he can't even get a giant swimming pool right, how can we expect him to do better with a ship that floats in an even larger "swimming pool"?

It's typical that he's more concerned about appearance than the health and welfare of the people staffing the aircraft carrier(s).
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
You know what? So fucking what if it's "hate"? Anyone who doesn't despise corruption, constant lying, bullying, fear- and hate-mongering, incompetence, waste, fraud, adultery, has some serious, serious issues.
Click to expand...
:hand:

especially when you are engaging with posters who pushed non stop hate over trivial things that were legal, such as Hunters paintings.

We might all agree it is unethical for the children of powerful politicians, top celebrities, or Top Ceo to make money off their family name in ways others could not, but it is not illegal and there is no possible way to ever stop that happening. The kids of those people, the ex business partners of those people, who have risen to prominence all can use their name or proximity to that person and try to succeed however they choose.
 
QP! said:
:hand:

especially when you are engaging with posters who pushed non stop hate over trivial things that were legal, such as Hunters paintings.

We might all agree it is unethical for the children of powerful politicians, top celebrities, or Top Ceo to make money off their family name in ways others could not, but it is not illegal and there is no possible way to ever stop that happening. The kids of those people, the ex business partners of those people, who have risen to prominence all can use their name or proximity to that person and try to succeed however they choose.
Click to expand...

Good point, esp. about Hunter Biden. The same MAGATs who wept and moaned about him are and were blind to Ivanka, Jared, Beavis & Butthead, Tiffany, Malaria, et al cashing in on Trump's presidency... to the tune of billions.
 
Grokmaster said:
"....... a former senior U.S. official familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity...."


More unsubstantiated liespeak from a usual source....
Click to expand...
“Unsubstantiated?”

www.newsweek.com

Trump's aircraft carrier changes draw warnings of higher costs, delays

Trump's plans for Navy aircraft carriers face criticism from analysts and contractors concerned about costs and construction delays.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top