Never forget
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
Yakuda
Verified User
Leftists killed Democrats and what's remaining is demoncraps. They arent human, they can't think all they can do is regurgitate the narrative. The funniest part is they don't even know what they're talking about.
The Virginia Company made the settlers who arrived at Jamestown try this out.
They were under strict orders to avoid fighting, to try to convert the Indians, to work with them rather than defeat and expel them.
That led to much suffering, culminating in the 1622 Massacre, in which a third of the colony died
Then they went scorched earth on the Indians, wiping out as many as they could and engaging in harsh reprisals. That worked much better, and bought them 20 years of peace.
They did the same in 1644. Chief Opechancanough (then elderly) led another surprise attack in the Third Anglo-Powhatan War, killing several hundred colonists.and then Nathaniel Bacon wiped out what remained of the Indian problem.
Peace at any cost let only to death. War and stern reprisals created the conditions for a prosperous society.
View: https://x.com/theoldworldshow/status/2065033522096574636?s=20
They were under strict orders to avoid fighting, to try to convert the Indians, to work with them rather than defeat and expel them.
That led to much suffering, culminating in the 1622 Massacre, in which a third of the colony died
Then they went scorched earth on the Indians, wiping out as many as they could and engaging in harsh reprisals. That worked much better, and bought them 20 years of peace.
They did the same in 1644. Chief Opechancanough (then elderly) led another surprise attack in the Third Anglo-Powhatan War, killing several hundred colonists.and then Nathaniel Bacon wiped out what remained of the Indian problem.
Peace at any cost let only to death. War and stern reprisals created the conditions for a prosperous society.
View: https://x.com/theoldworldshow/status/2065033522096574636?s=20
"Thomas Jefferson argued a case called Howell v Netherland in the highest colonial court of Virginia in 1770.
He was trying to gain the freedom of the grandchild of a ‘mulatto slave.’ He lost.
But what is remarkable is how intricate the racial distinctions were re who is a slave and who is not.
He argued there was a point where a slave woman’s offspring - by virtue of some ‘white blood’ interceding - became a ‘free man’ by virtue of ‘natural law.’
He goes through distinctions that reminded me of the Nuremberg laws in Germany. This is the kind of thing that should shed light on the high rhetoric of the founding.
It was so much more complicated than the standard line - which we will see constantly as we approach the 250th anniversary."
View: https://x.com/FischerKing64/status/2065650072764006652?s=20
He was trying to gain the freedom of the grandchild of a ‘mulatto slave.’ He lost.
But what is remarkable is how intricate the racial distinctions were re who is a slave and who is not.
He argued there was a point where a slave woman’s offspring - by virtue of some ‘white blood’ interceding - became a ‘free man’ by virtue of ‘natural law.’
He goes through distinctions that reminded me of the Nuremberg laws in Germany. This is the kind of thing that should shed light on the high rhetoric of the founding.
It was so much more complicated than the standard line - which we will see constantly as we approach the 250th anniversary."
View: https://x.com/FischerKing64/status/2065650072764006652?s=20
I post things that people like you apparently have no rebuttal for.
Grok, is the claim in this post accurate?
View: https://x.com/mattvanswol/status/2069095567771283878?s=20
Partially accurate on the core facts of the crime, but overstated on some details (including the outcome) and the "zero coverage" claim is directionally true for national legacy media but not absolute.
Local Atlanta-area outlets covered it, including FOX5 Atlanta, Atlanta News First, and others. The victim has publicly shared her survival story in interviews to raise awareness about violence against women.
The post lists major outlets (NYT, CNN, WaPo, MSNBC, NPR, Reuters, Axios, ABC, PBS) that gave extensive, sustained coverage to George Floyd's death and its aftermath (a defining national story involving police, protests, and politics).
For this case:
"Zero coverage" is likely hyperbolic but captures the selective outrage and national media silence compared to Floyd. High-profile cases like this often stay local unless they advance a broader story.
This is a tragic, random violent crime enabled by a repeat offender being on the street. The victim's survival and courage are remarkable. Media prioritization of stories isn't neutral—Floyd became a global phenomenon; brutal attacks like this often don't, especially when they complicate narratives about crime, race, and policing. Repeat offenders and lenient systems are a real issue in many cities, including Atlanta-area ones.
The post's core point about media double standards holds up, even if the "murder" detail is off.
Partially accurate on the core facts of the crime, but overstated on some details (including the outcome) and the "zero coverage" claim is directionally true for national legacy media but not absolute.
What happened (verified facts)
- In late January 2026, in DeKalb County, Georgia (Atlanta area), Dr. Jena Salem (a medical resident/physician) was the victim of a brutal home invasion.
- The attacker (Derrick/Derek Burnstine/Bernstein) cut the power to her home, broke in, strangled/choked her, sexually assaulted her, slit her throat with a knife, stabbed her in the chest (causing a collapsed lung), and assaulted her further. She fought back fiercely (the knife broke during the attack), escaped to a neighbor, and survived after hospitalization.
- The suspect was arrested nearby shortly after and faces serious charges (home invasion, aggravated assault, sexual assault-related counts, etc.). He was held without bond.
- Reports indicate he had a significant prior criminal record (dozens of charges, consistent with the post's "40+ previous charges").
Local Atlanta-area outlets covered it, including FOX5 Atlanta, Atlanta News First, and others. The victim has publicly shared her survival story in interviews to raise awareness about violence against women.
Inaccuracies in the post
- "Strangled, sexually assaulted, then had her throat slit" — This matches reports. The sequence was violent and horrific.
- "White female doctor" and "Black man" — Race is referenced in the post (and widely discussed online); suspect details align with circulating descriptions.
- She was killed — No, Dr. Salem survived and has spoken out. This is a significant exaggeration—the post frames it as a murder.
On media coverage
The post lists major outlets (NYT, CNN, WaPo, MSNBC, NPR, Reuters, Axios, ABC, PBS) that gave extensive, sustained coverage to George Floyd's death and its aftermath (a defining national story involving police, protests, and politics).
For this case:
- It received local/regional coverage (FOX5, Atlanta News First, etc.) and spread on social media/X.
- There appears to have been little to no prominent national coverage from the listed legacy outlets. This fits a pattern where certain crimes (especially interracial ones not fitting preferred narratives) get less attention than others.
"Zero coverage" is likely hyperbolic but captures the selective outrage and national media silence compared to Floyd. High-profile cases like this often stay local unless they advance a broader story.
Broader context
This is a tragic, random violent crime enabled by a repeat offender being on the street. The victim's survival and courage are remarkable. Media prioritization of stories isn't neutral—Floyd became a global phenomenon; brutal attacks like this often don't, especially when they complicate narratives about crime, race, and policing. Repeat offenders and lenient systems are a real issue in many cities, including Atlanta-area ones.
The post's core point about media double standards holds up, even if the "murder" detail is off.