No proof, no truth

Shouldn't OT expect someone he claims is more of a man than Trump be able to do what Trump did and meet with Putin?

Obama met with Putin, and you still called him a coward. Any trial would be held here, not in Russia. Just keep on being the "useful idiot".
 
Obama met with Putin, and you still called him a coward. Any trial would be held here, not in Russia. Just keep on being the "useful idiot".

I called Obama what the BOY is.

Why isn't Mueller demanding a meeting with Putin and they be turned over? I thought said he was a man.
 
For more than 150 years, The Nation has been committed to fearless, independent journalism.

We have a long history of seeking alternative views and taking unpopular stances. We believe it is important to challenge questionable conventional wisdom and to foster debate—not police it.

Focusing on unreported or inadequately reported issues of major importance and raising questions that are not being asked have always been a central part of our work.

This journalistic mission led The Nation to be troubled by the paucity of serious public scrutiny of the January 2017 intelligence-community assessment (ICA) on purported Russian interference in our 2016 presidential election, which reflects the judgment of the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA.

That report concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered the hacking of the DNC and the dissemination of e-mails from key staffers via WikiLeaks, in order to damage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.

This official intelligence assessment has since led to what some call “Russiagate,” with charges and investigations of alleged collusion with the Kremlin, and, in turn, to what is now a major American domestic political crisis and an increasingly perilous state of US-Russia relations.

To this day, however, the intelligence agencies that released this assessment have failed to provide the American people with any actual evidence substantiating their claims about how the DNC material was obtained or by whom.

Astonishingly and often overlooked, the authors of the declassified ICA themselves admit that their “judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.”

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-leak-or-a-hack-a-forum-on-the-vips-memo/



you are a liar and a troll
 
Mueller, who has more guts then cowards, and liars, like you, has issued indictments which the Russians will not accept. His part of the investigation as far as the 13, the 3 corporations, and the 12, is done. If Putin were serious, and only useful idiots like you would believe he is, he would send issue the summons to the 25, and send them to the US to face trial. You would rather kneel before Putin as you do Trump.

The point is that Putin is willing to help poor little Mullet do his job. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Over here...over there...wherever. Mullet thought that NO WAY WAS ANY ONE of those dirty dozen going to respond. Well, ONE of them called Mullet's bluff, said 'bring it on' and caught him off guard having nothing to present to get the ball rolling. Even the judge was having none of his nonsense of wanting more time.

So, let's see how happy and anxious Mullet actually is to get this case rolling on his Russian dirty dozen. Place your bets. :awesome:
 
Mueller should demand a meeting with Putin and tell him to turn them over. If, as OT claim, Mueller is a man, why would he not do that?

Because Mullet's got ugatz. Rosenweasel proved that when he released his statement that there was nothing that showed the election was affected, nor were there ANY Americans purposely involved. So, what's Mullet got left? Frittering away more millions of dollars to investigate his dirty dozen all in an attempt to prove what the whole world has already known for years...Russia likes to play around in other countries' election processes? The wind is out of Mullet's sails at the moment. :cool:

It was much more obvious and 'in your face' when Obama messed with Israel's election.
 
Collusion before our eyes:​
vid-180716-trump-putin-presser-helsinki-tease-njs-1119.jpg

Vlad lies and Daffy Dawn complies.​
 
Ahhh, the Trump poodles are out in full force this morning making their usual ASSumptions, and ignorantly passing along the right wing talking points never realizing that they are only ASSumption with no proof. In my lifetime I have never seen a trial go forward where the evidence, or proof, has been presented to the public for open discussion. The right wing, in all of their glorious ignorance, demands that the proof be given to the general public, and if not given then it does not exist, in their feeble mentalities anyway.

Without a trial, neither lefties nor righties can do anything more than make assumptions. Do you think there is some significance of these 12 indictments that have not gone to trial?
 
For more than 150 years, The Nation has been committed to fearless, independent journalism.

We have a long history of seeking alternative views and taking unpopular stances. We believe it is important to challenge questionable conventional wisdom and to foster debate—not police it.

Focusing on unreported or inadequately reported issues of major importance and raising questions that are not being asked have always been a central part of our work.

This journalistic mission led The Nation to be troubled by the paucity of serious public scrutiny of the January 2017 intelligence-community assessment (ICA) on purported Russian interference in our 2016 presidential election, which reflects the judgment of the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA.

That report concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered the hacking of the DNC and the dissemination of e-mails from key staffers via WikiLeaks, in order to damage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.

This official intelligence assessment has since led to what some call “Russiagate,” with charges and investigations of alleged collusion with the Kremlin, and, in turn, to what is now a major American domestic political crisis and an increasingly perilous state of US-Russia relations.

To this day, however, the intelligence agencies that released this assessment have failed to provide the American people with any actual evidence substantiating their claims about how the DNC material was obtained or by whom.

Astonishingly and often overlooked, the authors of the declassified ICA themselves admit that their “judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.”

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-leak-or-a-hack-a-forum-on-the-vips-memo/

What is wrong with you guys?. Do you think investigators are supposed to relese their invesigation findings to the fucking public on a regular basis? that is what you think? Top secret investigations , inviolving foreign actors and Americans should be released to the public? What would be good for you? Should Mueller email you once a week?

This is so stupid. This is not how it works. Tell the public and watch those involved jump on planes and head out. Do you really think they shoud relase the evidence that gather on a regular basis. It would shorten trials. Just have them read the papers . Jurors could just drop into a trial and vote and then go home.
 
What is wrong with you guys?. Do you think investigators are supposed to relese their invesigation findings to the fucking public on a regular basis? that is what you think? Top secret investigations , inviolving foreign actors and Americans should be released to the public? What would be good for you? Should Mueller email you once a week? This is so stupid. This is not how it works. Tell the public and watch those involved jump on planes and head out. Do you really think they shoud relase the evidence that gather on a regular basis. It would shorten trials. Just have them read the papers . Jurors could just drop into a trial and vote and then go home.

No proof, no truth, old man.
 
Back
Top