NOAA says there is no statistically increased trend in hurricanes since 1851

Bu-BU-BU-BUT "CLIMATE CHANGE!!!!"


THE FANATICS OF THE WARMIST/CLIMATISTA RELIGION HAVE NO USE FOR THE ACTUAL EMPIRICAL DATA....
 
.

But what the fuck do they know anyway, when you have the likes of McMoonshi'ite, Madwitch, Barfly Effete, Poor Dick, Arsecheese and Nonads.

Since 1851, there has been no statistically significant trend in either hurricane (slightly down) or major hurricane (flat) landfall frequency.


Those six and deniers like yourself. Since when have you, and the moron who seconded your thread below your own post, accepted NOAA as knowing something about climate history?
 
Lol, you're an ocean going retard! If you know they keep the records, what the fuck are you banging on about then?

The banging is on you, dumbbell. You cite NOAA when it suits you, ignore or refute them when the science clashes with your fantasy.
 
Neither. I don't pretend to know the science or the history of hurricanes but I respect the uncorrupted opinions of those that do.
 
.

But what the fuck do they know anyway, when you have the likes of McMoonshi'ite, Madwitch, Barfly Effete, Poor Dick, Arsecheese and Nonads.

Since 1851, there has been no statistically significant trend in either hurricane (slightly down) or major hurricane (flat) landfall frequency.


Size and strength however is a different story. But good job finding a narrow category you can use to support a right wing talking point.
 
Size and strength however is a different story. But good job finding a narrow category you can use to support a right wing talking point.

I have never known a lawyer who could not match subject and predicate or the proper use of punctuation.
 
I have never known a lawyer who could not match subject and predicate or the proper use of punctuation.

Says the Earl fraud who once actually posted a 'dictionary definition ' that he'd previously doctored in order to win a point.


Haw, haw..................................haw.
 
Back
Top