NOAA says there is no statistically increased trend in hurricanes since 1851

Primavera said:
He used to be far far worse, somebody has been giving him lessons. What I'd like to know is how did he pass the bar exam anyway?
Click to expand...

I don’t believe that he did.

He may be a paralegal though they have to know grammar too.

Pristine grammar is important in legal matters and on this forum. Young people read these forums and Lord knows how badly they need to see pristine grammar.
 
Primavera said:
.

But what the fuck do they know anyway, when you have the likes of McMoonshi'ite, Madwitch, Barfly Effete, Poor Dick, Arsecheese and Nonads.

Since 1851, there has been no statistically significant trend in either hurricane (slightly down) or major hurricane (flat) landfall frequency.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1575822290431770624
Click to expand...

Hey! The Left has never let science get in the way of their politics. They will silence you and replace those at the NOAA using facts and science with those that parrot the party line soon enough, just as they have elsewhere in academia and government.
 
martin said:
Those six and deniers like yourself. Since when have you, and the moron who seconded your thread below your own post, accepted NOAA as knowing something about climate history?
Click to expand...

when they use empirical data to draw a conclusion as opposed to opinion.

they got publically embarrassed some years back and have been trying to earn back credibility.
 
martin said:
Those six and deniers like yourself. Since when have you, and the moron who seconded your thread below your own post, accepted NOAA as knowing something about climate history?
Click to expand...

So you do NOT accept NOAA's hurricane data????
 
Primavera said:
.

But what the fuck do they know anyway, when you have the likes of McMoonshi'ite, Madwitch, Barfly Effete, Poor Dick, Arsecheese and Nonads.

Since 1851, there has been no statistically significant trend in either hurricane (slightly down) or major hurricane (flat) landfall frequency.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1575822290431770624
Click to expand...
McMoonshi'ite, Madwitch, Barfly Effete, Poor Dick, Arsecheese and Nonads will just deny the science. :dunno:.
 
Grokmaster said:
Bu-BU-BU-BUT "CLIMATE CHANGE!!!!"


THE FANATICS OF THE WARMIST/CLIMATISTA RELIGION HAVE NO USE FOR THE ACTUAL EMPIRICAL DATA....
Click to expand...

We are swamped with FantasyLand Creatures who no matter what will continue to spin their fantasies as fact.....I am currently listening to Bret and Heather talking about Nature (the top rated science journal) yet again selling trans ideology, violating science the entire way.
 
It is interesting watching the Save the Planet types spinning hurricanes as proof of coming doom when the science says that a warming planet likely would lead to fewer hurricanes, and there is no reason to think that the ones we do have will be stronger.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
It is interesting watching the Save the Planet types spinning hurricanes as proof of coming doom when the science says that a warming planet likely would lead to fewer hurricanes, and there is no reason to think that the ones we do have will be stronger.
Click to expand...

Marty knows better. He knows the difference between a spike and a trend, clever Marty.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Increased wind shear will keep hurricanes from forming is the theory.

You might pay attention.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately it appears to be you who isn't paying attention. Listen to ANY meteorologist or hurricane expert and they'll note the importance of warm water to increase hurricane strength.

:)
 
Primavera said:
T'was ever so, it's gone from global warming to climate change, what next?
Click to expand...

So far, the Church of Global Warming has tried to rename itself to global cooling, global warming, climate change, climate disaster, climate catastrophe, coming ice age, climate extremes, and whatever the fuck they come up with in the future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top