Now it's 'dangerous,' we are told, to stop Dems from overthrowing the American people
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
What a fucking loser...you whine and cry about an election being stolen, hyping The Big Lie for three straight months, but then when it came time for you to answer the call to save the Republic on 1/6, you were nowhere to be found.
Well, that's not entirely true...you were here on JPP, running your big mouth to get people to do the action you're too chickenshit to do yourself.
You can't even defend your actions that day, you try to pretend as if calling you out for not showing up is a fallacy, but you won't say what kind of fallacy it is.
LOL @ your desperation.
BTW - thanks for running your lying mouth so much that you cost Trump the Presidency and the GOP the Senate. We couldn't have won both without you.
Democrats in 2016:
I refuse to accept the election results. It's all rigged! Our democracy! Secret Russian agents everywhere!
Democrats in 2017:
I refuse to accept the election results. It's all rigged! Our democracy! Secret Russian agents everywhere!
Democrats in 2018:
I refuse to accept the election results. It's all rigged! Our democracy! Secret Russian agents everywhere!
Democrats in 2019:
I refuse to accept the election results. It's all rigged! Our democracy! Secret Russian agents everywhere!
Democrats in 2020:
Objecting to election theft is "whining."
Mathematical law is only fake news to the anti-science crowd (you).
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
We did accept the election results. Clinton conceded to Trump the day after he was declared the victor.
What you couldn't accept was that Trump won with help from Russia.
Except we did accept the election results and then proved that Trump had colluded with Russia while you, Trump, and every other Conservative said Trump and his campaign had "no contact with Russia".
That was a lie you and Trump were telling.
Actually, you're the ones who didn't want to accept the 2018 election results because the Democrats won the House that year.
In fact, you all cheated in 2018:
How Republicans Tried to Rig an Election in North Carolina (And Almost Got Away With It)
https://www.gq.com/story/north-carolina-ninth-district-fraud
And then you disseminated Russian propaganda either unwittingly because you're a moron, or wittingly because you're a traitor:
Study Exposes Russia Disinformation Campaign That Operated In The Shadows For 6 Years
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/16/8781...-campaign-that-operated-in-the-shadows-for-6-
Not sure what you're talking about here because we won all the elections in 2019.
There was no election theft in 2020.
You know how I know that? Because if there was, you would have gone to DC to "stop the steal" on 1/6, since you had been claiming there was election theft for months.
But you didn't.
Chump.
What is the math that you don't understand? Maybe I can help you understand it since you seem impaired.
You've copied and pasted this over a dozen times now, so let's tear it apart:
So...
1. You admit that what happened on 1/6 was a terrorist attack.
2. How else are you going to combat the greatest theft in American history, other than sitting on an anonymous message board, talking shit?
3. If it was the greatest theft in American history, and you are 100% confident, then why aren't you taking any actual physical action to do anything about it? How come you're just copying and pasting the same garbage, that you likely stole from someone else, over and over?
You've copied and pasted this dozens of times so let's tear it apart:
No it's not invalid logic at all.
You ran your big mouth for three months, and then when the time came for you to act on what your big mouth was running, you chose to hide in the shadows.
So what about that is me attacking you personally? Don't you believe the election was stolen?
And how is it a non-sequitur when the thread is about your allegation that Democrats stole the election? Don't you believe the election was stolen?
LMAO!
All I asked was why on 1/6, you were here on JPP instead of in DC fighting the greatest theft in American history?
How are you fighting the greatest theft in American history by copying-and-pasting the work of other people on an anonymous message board?
Fact is, you wanted to rile everyone else up so they would take the action you are too much of a pussy to take yourself.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Taunt, goad, and troll for what purpose? Do you think you're a victim here? You're only a victim of your own gullibility and cowardice.
Such a super patriot who chooses to fight from the shadows by stealing the work of other people.
Well, we had the Mueller Report and two impeachments.
All you have is a failed coup based on a lie that you were spreading on JPP, that you were too much of a fucking pussy to act on.
I know you didn't write this sentence on your own because the grammar and spelling are correct for once.
So from whom did you steal this?
What are you 11 years old? And I'm pretty sure Democrats forfeited the right to call anyone else a traitor when they:
-sided with and aided every enemy this country has had for half a century straight
-framed a sitting president as a secret Russian agent
-committed hundreds upon hundreds of terrorist attacks on courthouses, cops, capitals, INS facilities, etc., for four years straight
-opposed every part of the Constitution
-stole the election
-violated their oaths
-burned our flag
-banned our Pledge
-aided illegal immigration (and the gang mass murders, oceans of opioid deaths, and sex trafficking that comes with it)
-spit on our Anthem
-tore down our monuments
-hijacked our education system to lie to our children about our history
And so on. Get the picture, world's biggest hypocrite?
Actually, the responses debunked all of your fallacies, you're just too much of a chickenshit to confront it.
Just like you were too much of a chickenshit to confront the "greatest theft in American history" on 1/6.
Chump.
The real Arminius would have laughed you right out of his army for being such a fucking pussy, goading others to attack the Romans from the safety of the latrines you were scrubbing.
Hold on a second, you claim they stole the election but all you did about it was copy and paste bullshit other people wrote.
Do you really believe the election was stolen, or are you just talking shit?
Trump is the one who sided with Russia against our own Intelligence Community.
Reagan is the one who armed Osama bin Laden.
Bush the Elder is the one who armed Saddam.
Condi Rice played footsie with Ghaddafi.
Trump said he loved Kim Jong.
Nixon opened relations with China.
Last edited: