Now that they rigged Pratt out who wins?

[ADreamOfLiberty]

Yes. That's how evidence works.

No, it isn't. If I find pottery in an archeological dig site that is evidence. You can say "but where is your video of humans making this pot" all you want.

When the creators of a movie ABOUT mules and CLAIMING ten thousand mules exist, doesn't show one mule, is that not a problem?

It's only a problem if they had footage of the locations they were claiming the cell data was linked to.

You showed ONE homeless person, who was recorded by a random Twitter user. That is your what you're basing your beliefs on? Really?

Among thousands of other data points , yes.

Yes and no. When you have a trillion GPS data points and millions of minutes of video, it seems logical to believe they should be able to produce more than one, though one is better than literally zero.

It would be zero if none of the video was of a location identified by the GPS data.

"I simply said it hasn't been debunked"

Exactly. As I mentioned at the end of my last post, you believe it, regardless of the evidence, until is proven false.

Regardless of the evidence? It is evidence. As much as some government guy claiming there was a glitch or that a ballot didn't get counted.

They claimed 10,000 mules and showed zero. They provided literally zero support for their claim.

It was a raw claim, no data was made public, no audit could be done on the claim.

That matters nothing to you because you will believe it until it's disproven

I will give a non-zero weight to it until it is disproved just as I give a non-zero weight to Carroll's claims even though they are raw and totally uncorroborated.

What is the relevance of one official lying?

How people react.

You don't give a fuck. (What did you say, lack of intellectual curiosity?)

The judge doesn't give a fuck.

The executive branch doesn't give a fuck.

The media doesn't give a fuck.

Rock solid conclusion: There are no guardrails.

 

[ZenMode]

No, it isn't. If I find pottery in an archeological dig site that is evidence. You can say "but where is your video of humans making this pot" all you want.


It's only a problem if they had footage of the locations they were claiming the cell data was linked to.



Among thousands of other data points , yes.



It would be zero if none of the video was of a location identified by the GPS data.



Regardless of the evidence? It is evidence. As much as some government guy claiming there was a glitch or that a ballot didn't get counted.



It was a raw claim, no data was made public, no audit could be done on the claim.



I will give a non-zero weight to it until it is disproved just as I give a non-zero weight to Carroll's claims even though they are raw and totally uncorroborated.



How people react.

You don't give a fuck. (What did you say, lack of intellectual curiosity?)

The judge doesn't give a fuck.

The executive branch doesn't give a fuck.

The media doesn't give a fuck.

Rock solid conclusion: There are no guardrails.

Yet another post full of you making excuses and creating stories to believe what you want to believe.

A movie about mules shows literally not one mule and all you can do is create excuses and deflect. That is your approach to everything election fraud related. You believe it until you're proving wrong, but because of your ability to deflect and create reality, you will never be proven wrong.

An unfortunate way to go through life because, as you have proven, you have a completely warped view of reality.

 

[ADreamOfLiberty]

@ZenMode no novel argument made, ritualized repetition of falsehoods meant to excuse the fact that you're about to quit. All my points stand.

 

[Lionfish]

Yet another post full of you making excuses and creating stories to believe what you want to believe.

A movie about mules shows literally not one mule and all you can do is create excuses and deflect. That is your approach to everything election fraud related. You believe it until you're proving wrong, but because of your ability to deflect and create reality, you will never be proven wrong.

An unfortunate way to go through life because, as you have proven, you have a completely warped view of reality.

I will ask one more time: exactly what evidence are you asking for? Be very specific.

 

[ADreamOfLiberty]

I will ask one more time: exactly what evidence are you asking for? Be very specific.

And... would such evidence be expected to exist!

For example, if I said the only evidence I would accept that Trump raped someone is his confession on video in front of a crowd of 50,000 that would not be reasonable because that evidence is unlikely even if Trump raped someone.

 

[Lionfish]

And... would such evidence be expected to exist!

For example, if I said the only evidence I would accept that Trump raped someone is his confession on video in front of a crowd of 50,000 that would not be reasonable because that evidence is unlikely even if Trump raped someone.

They always run when asked to define evidence.

 

[ZenMode]

I will ask one more time: exactly what evidence are you asking for? Be very specific.

Regarding 2000 Mules? I'm asking them to show, by their own definition, an actual mule.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Jarod]

What exactly do you want for facts?

Whatever it is, you base your opinion on. If it’s nothing But emotions and feelings just tell us that.

 

[Lionfish]

Whatever it is, you base your opinion on. If it’s nothing But emotions and feelings just tell us that.

Answer the question. Be specific. What exactly do you consider to be the nature of the evidence you so desperately demand?

Rin Rin Away again.

 

[Diogenes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2065032801737478589

View: https://x.com/dcopechatter/status/2065032801737478589?s=20

 

[Lionfish]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2065480031275544812

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2065480031275544812

 

[Jarod]

So which marxist will be cheated into office?

Raman noodle couldn’t even win her council district

She even conceded on election night and we are supposed to believe she won fair and square.

As I said, everything that happened went according to Commiefornistan law. The rigging is baked into the law

How was it rigged?

 

[Nordberg]

Rightys are so insane. Pratt was 8 points further behind than Raimen. He would have been EASIER to beat. Bragg would have been happier with Pratt. LA is 80 percent Dem. Rightys do not have to make sense. Come up with a conspiracy- any one will do- and swear it's true.

 

[Lionfish]

How was it rigged?

Prove it wasn't rigged.

 

[Jarod]

Prove it wasn't rigged.

Typical silliness, make a claim then ask others to prove its not true.

Prove to me you dont beat women?

 

[Lionfish]

Typical silliness, make a claim then ask others to prove its not true.

Prove to me you dont beat women?

Prove it was not rigged. It should be easy if CA agrees to turn over its voter rolls. Why do they refuse? Why do most blue states refuse to turn over their voter rolls? Why are you so naive?

 

[Jarod]

Prove it was not rigged. It should be easy if CA agrees to turn over its voter rolls. Why do they refuse? Why do most blue states refuse to turn over their voter rolls? Why are you so naive?

You made the claim, you prove its true. I cant prove a negative.

Prove you do not beat women?

 

[Lionfish]

You made the claim, you prove its true. I cant prove a negative.

Prove you do not beat women?

You are rinning away again.

 

[Jarod]

You are rinning away again.

I am right here. Are you obfuscating again?>