Nunes admits he never read the FISA applications

noise said:
His STAFF wrote them BAC, based on the notes from Gowdy.
If you were at all interested in transparency, you would be calling on DoJ to release the applications to the entire Committee - hell the entire nation.. It's not like classification is protecting any secrets/nat'l security
Click to expand...

Wouldn't Nunes, regardless of whether he read it himself or not, ensure it was an accurate representation of what Gowdy had surmised? To just accept it as is is a failure on his part. Buck stops with him, right?
 
blackascoal said:
The point is that he based his entire weak ass dud argument on a document he's never read.
Click to expand...

The committee set up an agreement with the Justice Department that would allow just one person to review the documents. Nunes said he thought Gowdy would be the best choice because of his background as a federal prosecutor, and that Gowdy then shared his notes and observations with the rest of the members. What part of that are you libs having a hard time with? I refer you to your own signature.
 
Gotcha68 said:
Wouldn't Nunes, regardless of whether he read it himself or not, ensure it was an accurate representation of what Gowdy had surmised? To just accept it as is is a failure on his part. Buck stops with him, right?
Click to expand...

How would he do that without violating the terms of the committees agreement with the Justice Department? You people are grasping at straws. If Nunes had read the documents along with Gowdy, you idiots would be screaming, "HE VIOLATED THE AGREEMENT!!!!!"

Here's a little advice, no extra charge. You rats might wanna consider jumping from the sinking ship. ;)
 
Gotcha68 said:
Wouldn't Nunes, regardless of whether he read it himself or not, ensure it was an accurate representation of what Gowdy had surmised? To just accept it as is is a failure on his part. Buck stops with him, right?
Click to expand...
Of course. even the Dems aren't saying what was written was false. They say it's a mischaracterization-
but we haven't seen otherwise..

At this point the only real way to know is release the FISA applications themselves
 
noise said:
Hillary had the benefit of obfuscation because of the CIA ( Morrell) statements.
But she clearly did know the attack was terrorist that same night..

The entire Obama adm went on spin mode after that,and it was difficult to prove Hillary was responsible-
but then again one has to call on somebody..

Like I always say "Bengazi was the symptom -Libyan war 2011 was the disease" ( Hillary did that -she swayed Obama)
Click to expand...

The point, you obfuscating meat popsicle, is that Hillary trounced Gowdey so severely that he is now reduced to being a laughing stock for anyone with an IQ over 80 ( which admittedly means the bulk of conservatards on this forum including yourself.

Save your bluster and bullshit for your little tiny fanclub.
 
countryboy said:
How would he do that without violating the terms of the committees agreement with the Justice Department? You people are grasping at straws. If Nunes had read the documents along with Gowdy, you idiots would be screaming, "HE VIOLATED THE AGREEMENT!!!!!"

Here's a little advice, no extra charge. You rats might wanna consider jumping from the sinking ship. ;)
Click to expand...

I didn't say that. I said wouldn't Nunes check that his staff adequately represented Gowdy's words because it would appear either they didn't or he didn't.
 
noise said:
Of course. even the Dems aren't saying what was written was false. They say it's a mischaracterization-
but we haven't seen otherwise..

At this point the only real way to know is release the FISA applications themselves
Click to expand...

Wrong again liar.
 
Rune said:
The point, you obfuscating meat popsicle, is that Hillary trounced Gowdey so severely that he is now reduced to being a laughing stock for anyone with an IQ over 80 ( which admittedly means the bulk of conservatards on this forum including yourself.

Save your bluster and bullshit for your little tiny fanclub.
Click to expand...
Umm no..what was shown was shitty security
( They used LIFG fighters)..somebody is responsible right?

The problem is pinning the tail on the correct Donkey - myself I think the whole CIA annex thing was a way to funnel arms to Syria gotten from Libyan warlords -but the BASIC problem was Hillary /Obama created a terrorist state in Libya that exists to this day.
 
countryboy said:
The committee set up an agreement with the Justice Department that would allow just one person to review the documents. Nunes said he thought Gowdy would be the best choice because of his background as a federal prosecutor, and that Gowdy then shared his notes and observations with the rest of the members. What part of that are you libs having a hard time with? I refer you to your own signature.
Click to expand...

^THIS!!!!!!! Thank-you!

What is wrong with some people here? Why does all this have to be explained over and over? My gosh, don't libs go and look stuff up and read the full news on all this!!! :palm:
 
Gotcha68 said:
I didn't say that. I said wouldn't Nunes check that his staff adequately represented Gowdy's words because it would appear either they didn't or he didn't.
Click to expand...

How exactly does it appear he didn't? Please be specific. Have you read the material? Are you on the committee?
 
noise said:
Umm no..what was shown was shitty security
( They used LIFG fighters)..somebody is responsible right?

The problem is pinning the tail on the correct Donkey - myself I think the whole CIA annex thing was a way to funnel arms to Syria gotten from Libyan warlords -but the BASIC problem was Hillary /Obama created a terrorist state in Libya that exists to this day.
Click to expand...

Shitstain ; nice diversion but NO ONE GIVES A FUCK.

If there was any guilt at all, Then a "superb lawyer" would have done better than Gowdey did.

You are testifying against yourself but too stupid to see it.
 
countryboy said:
How exactly does it appear he didn't? Please be specific. Have you read the material? Are you on the committee?
Click to expand...

Due to the FBI stating that they didn't add context or misrepresented the documents? Either Gowdy misrepresented what he read or Nunes's people misrepresented Gowdy.
 
noise said:
#ReleasetheFISA ... anyone disagree?
Click to expand...

Put it all out there. As long as it's everything from both sides. None of this partisan bs. Both sides need to lay their cards on the table with nothing up their sleeves. (wishful thinking but that's still free)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top