I played your game.
By all means if you have an actual point expound upon it or shut up.
You are beginning to bore me.
Nunes admits he never read the FISA applications
- Thread starter Rune
- Start date
I played your game.
By all means if you have an actual point expound upon it or shut up.
You are beginning to bore me.
You lovvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvve them now, LOL!!!!!! No more cursing them out without the facts. Just pure lovvvvvvvvvvvve.
Find even one post.
You can't.
I hope the love continues. This is remarkable. Before ever studying all the facts of the past year up to this memo release, all law enforcement posts were against the "pigs, liars and scum". Now they are heroes to be unquestioned and adored.
Grounds for arrest?
hvilleherb
Verified User
Acquiring uranium in Georgia and giving it to the Russians.
Wait, what? It was a ten-gram sample and he handed it over for forensic analysis.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
The FBI and Justice departments did .. and there were obviously gross omissions that painted the process purely through the partisan view.
The democrats response fills in some of the glaring gaps that everyone knows is there.
The only point of this dud is to prep his supporters for a programmed response to the investigation.
What happens when Mueller comes back with a criminal charge?
You'll cry foul .. just like they programmed you to do.
Take the red pill good sister. You're too smart for this.
The FBI and Justice departments did .. and there were obviously gross omissions that painted the process purely through the partisan view.
The democrats response fills in some of the glaring gaps that everyone knows is there.
The only point of this dud is to prep his supporters for a programmed response to the investigation.
What happens when Mueller comes back with a criminal charge?
You'll cry foul .. just like they programmed you to do.
Take the red pill good sister. You're too smart for this.
What exact omissions? Who is reporting exactly what was omitted?
Doesn't really matter, the memo was only phase 1, about 10% of all that is to come.
It is friendly though to see all the left showin' law enforcement so much love and respect now all of a sudden.
hvilleherb
Verified User
The FBI and Justice departments did .. and there were obviously gross omissions that painted the process purely through the partisan view.
Then what was omitted?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I want the demmycrats to show us the gross ommisions.......I also want to see the threats to national security......finally, let's see the text of the FISA warrant applications.......you know, those things the FBI said had never been filed last year?........
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
It's actually phase 2 .. phase one being the secret society faceplant dud of a revelation.
Your 'shocking' release of the memo was only shocking in its failure to prove anything other than how desperate the Trump world has become.
This has nothing to do with blind adulation of law enforcement .. which obviously your side doesn't have either .. it's about Donald Trump's FEAR of what the Mueller investigation has already uncovered.
Any idea why your side isn't doing ANYTHING about potential Russian interference in the next election?
I do.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
That the FiSA court was well aware of who funded the dossier for starters.
Perhaps you can explain to me how that alone invalidates the information when the court will act on information provided by known criminals.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
hvilleherb
Verified User
It is a factual statement.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Lo and Behold ..
The central argument in the Nunes memo may have just been debunked
The Nunes memo's claim that the FBI and Department of Justice misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when seeking to wiretap Trump campaign adviser Carter Page may have been quashed.
Officials familiar with the matter told The Washington Post and The New York Times that the DOJ made it clear to the court that information contained in a dossier they submitted as part of a FISA application to surveil Page was politically motivated.
The revelation undercuts the most important claim in Nunes' memo as he seeks to characterize the FBI and the DOJ as corrupt and biased against President Donald Trump.
The most important claim in a controversial memo released Friday by the House Intelligence Committee — that the FBI and the Department of Justice misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) when they submitted an application to surveil a key Trump campaign adviser — may have just been quashed.
The memo was released as part of an investigation House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has been conducting over the past year into what he characterizes as bias and corruption within the FBI and DOJ.
In particular, the Nunes memo, which was declassified Friday by President Donald Trump, alleges that top DOJ officials concealed the political motives behind a dossier they submitted as part of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application to wiretap Carter Page, who worked as an early foreign-policy adviser on Trump's campaign.
The claim fueled accusations from Trump and his loyalists that the Russia investigation is not an independent inquiry into potential collusion between the campaign and Russia, but a Democrat-led "witch hunt" meant to undermine his presidency.
But The Washington Post reported late Friday night that the court that approved the warrant was aware at the time that the dossier's production was politically motivated.
One official with knowledge of the matter told The Post that the DOJ made "ample disclosure of relevant, material facts" to the FISC which revealed "the research was being paid for by a political entity."
"No thinking person who read any of these applications would come to any other conclusion" other than that the dossier's production was carried out "at the behest of people with a partisan aim and that it was being done in opposition to Trump," they added.
The revelation appears to corroborate claims made in a 10-page rebuttal memo crafted by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee. Sources told The New York Times on Friday that the Democratic memo also says the FBI informed the FISC that the dossier was politically motivated, but did not reveal which political entity specifically financed it.
The dossier, which was compiled by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele and alleges a number of improper ties between Trump and Russia, has become a central point of controversy as the Russia investigation picks up steam.
It was originally funded by a group of Republicans who opposed Trump during the Republican primaries. After Trump became the party's nominee, Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee hired the Perkins Coie law firm, which in turn retained the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS to fund the dossier's production.
Though Trump and his allies have slammed the document as "fake" and "phony" — and while it does contain some dubious allegations that have not been corroborated — both the FBI and the Senate Intelligence Committee are using it as a "roadmap" in their investigations and have verified a number of its claims.
more at link
http://www.businessinsider.com/nunes-memo-fisa-court-steele-dossier-argument-debunked-2018-2
Phase 2 .. Dud 2
Next
The central argument in the Nunes memo may have just been debunked
The Nunes memo's claim that the FBI and Department of Justice misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when seeking to wiretap Trump campaign adviser Carter Page may have been quashed.
Officials familiar with the matter told The Washington Post and The New York Times that the DOJ made it clear to the court that information contained in a dossier they submitted as part of a FISA application to surveil Page was politically motivated.
The revelation undercuts the most important claim in Nunes' memo as he seeks to characterize the FBI and the DOJ as corrupt and biased against President Donald Trump.
The most important claim in a controversial memo released Friday by the House Intelligence Committee — that the FBI and the Department of Justice misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) when they submitted an application to surveil a key Trump campaign adviser — may have just been quashed.
The memo was released as part of an investigation House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has been conducting over the past year into what he characterizes as bias and corruption within the FBI and DOJ.
In particular, the Nunes memo, which was declassified Friday by President Donald Trump, alleges that top DOJ officials concealed the political motives behind a dossier they submitted as part of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application to wiretap Carter Page, who worked as an early foreign-policy adviser on Trump's campaign.
The claim fueled accusations from Trump and his loyalists that the Russia investigation is not an independent inquiry into potential collusion between the campaign and Russia, but a Democrat-led "witch hunt" meant to undermine his presidency.
But The Washington Post reported late Friday night that the court that approved the warrant was aware at the time that the dossier's production was politically motivated.
One official with knowledge of the matter told The Post that the DOJ made "ample disclosure of relevant, material facts" to the FISC which revealed "the research was being paid for by a political entity."
"No thinking person who read any of these applications would come to any other conclusion" other than that the dossier's production was carried out "at the behest of people with a partisan aim and that it was being done in opposition to Trump," they added.
The revelation appears to corroborate claims made in a 10-page rebuttal memo crafted by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee. Sources told The New York Times on Friday that the Democratic memo also says the FBI informed the FISC that the dossier was politically motivated, but did not reveal which political entity specifically financed it.
The dossier, which was compiled by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele and alleges a number of improper ties between Trump and Russia, has become a central point of controversy as the Russia investigation picks up steam.
It was originally funded by a group of Republicans who opposed Trump during the Republican primaries. After Trump became the party's nominee, Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee hired the Perkins Coie law firm, which in turn retained the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS to fund the dossier's production.
Though Trump and his allies have slammed the document as "fake" and "phony" — and while it does contain some dubious allegations that have not been corroborated — both the FBI and the Senate Intelligence Committee are using it as a "roadmap" in their investigations and have verified a number of its claims.
more at link
http://www.businessinsider.com/nunes-memo-fisa-court-steele-dossier-argument-debunked-2018-2
Phase 2 .. Dud 2
Next
Well, if the judge knew it was politically connected then the judge has a huge problem having approved the original and then approving it following 3 times it was presented for renewal.
It's not recent. This has been going on for more than a year that the left wanted this "insurance policy".
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
see attached copy......
lol
No wonder assholes like you love Nunes's bullshit memo. Tossing out half-truths to the point of lying.
10g sample confiscated from Georgian smugglers to be sent to Russia for forensic analysis at the request and permission of Georgia.
Typical pathetic Trumptard attempt.
Darth?
ILA?
Guess neither of you idiots realize that the DOJ enforces Congressional Contempt charges...if they agree to.
Fucking idiots.