Any junior U.S. Attorney could simply pick out one of the sixteen already filed criminal complaints alleging conspiracy (18 U.S.C. 371) against Stewart Rhodes’s underlings, simply swap out “Person 1” with “Stewart Rhodes,” and secure the single easiest indictment in modern American history.
One would think there should be a phalanx of angry U.S. Attorneys all pining for the career prize of being the one who took down Stewart Rhodes.
But therein lies the bind: if Stewart Rhodes (as we strongly suspect) is a federal operative, or was in communication with federal operatives, or was under the surveillance of Feds, the entire artifice of 1/6 lies comes crumbling down.
They need Stewart Rhodes’s communications if they really want to figure out what happened on 1/6, but if those communications become part of the Discovery Production of the trial case, and Stewart Rhodes was in communications with Federal assets, then it’s game over for the Justice Department.
They look ridiculous if they don’t prosecute Stewart Rhodes, but if they do, and he’s a Fed, then he has leverage to squeal on them.
https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/s...s-missing-link-fbi-unindicted-co-conspirator/
____________
Since it’s under reported or not reported at all by our useless media, one has to go to third tier outlets for some investigative reporting on Stewart Rhodes, the alleged head conspirator in 1/6. Aka Person Number One in the charging documents.
It’s curious why Rhodes walks around free when the feds busted a literal grandma this week for her ‘role’ in the Great Insurrection and this piece raises some interesting questions in that regard. It’s also claimed that Rhodes escaped being charged in the Clive Bundy affair under Obama.
Odd coincidence, that.
Another "61" thread in the making? Keep those silly conspiracy theories coming, Opie. It's what you do best.
What more is there to report if he’s under investigation, but the Feds don’t talk about their investigations.
LMAO