Our children dont want racism

YAWN. Typical dumb ass right wing response when caught it yet another lie. Admit you have not researched the topic as you claim. If you had then you would readily know what teachings of CRT support the codifying of racism. And you would know how the laws being passed in Texas (if you had read my original question), and other right wing States., codify racism.

Give it up. You are a right wing racist mother f**ker with nothing but hate for minorities, and others.

Give it up? I'm not racist in the least, but it's clear you're a delusional radical Leftist who thinks anything that goes against your views is somehow "fascist" because that's the new buzzword of the moment. You wouldn't know what fascism was if it ran you over in the street.

Now, let's turn to your choice of sources. Two are op eds, one is a literary piece and the last a genuinely pathetically researched paper. All are the product of either Leftists or radical Leftists. Of course, these would smear anything and everything not Leftist or to their liking as fascist or with some other pejorative de jour. Doesn't mean they're correct. In fact, they're often so wrong it hurts to read their drivel.


An op ed. Here's the core of the article's complaints:

The publication (cited earlier in the article by the Center for Constitutional Rights https://ccrjustice.org/ a misnomered radical Leftist organization) comes on the eve of the latest gathering of Alec, officially known as the American Legislative Exchange Council, which will be attended by hundreds of largely Republican state-level legislators and their big business allies.
The four-day States & Nation Policy Summit will open at a resort in Scottsdale, Arizona, on Wednesday with an agenda touching on several of Alec’s core principles including “election integrity”, privatisation of education and support for homeschooling, and protection for pharmaceutical companies.

None of ALEC's proposals listed in the article are "fascist," but many would sure as hell set off the radical Left because they hate those ideas. Of course, the article ignores its sources hailing from the radical Left--and I suggest anyone interested check out CCR listed above and make your own mind up were that group sits politically.

Bottom line: The article proves nothing about "Right wing fascism."


This one's a real doozy! It goes on a rant about Blacks and fascism from the most radical Leftist point of view you can have. It cites a veritable who's who of the most radical Black Left like hard core Communist George Padmore, cultural nationalist (eg., Black separatist) Langston Hughes, and at one point the convicted domestic terrorist Angela Davis, among others.
Of course, such hard core political radicals of the Left are going to see everything opposing them in terms of their worst enemies and smear them with labels like "fascist." It's hardly solid evidence of anything being so tainted in position.


Then we have the Leftist Brennan Center chucking up a cherry picked report that confirms their conclusions. It makes all sorts of unsubstantiated claims in between the cherry picked evidence it uses.


I find it curious that a radial Leftist would cite the ADL, but since this article is only about Trump bashing it proves nothing on "Right wing fascism." You can see that in the stuff Old Trapper posted from the article himself:

"Donald Trump’s legacy, “the most terrible, horrific thing he has left us in America, is the destruction of truth… And a democracy can’t survive if there is no truth.”

That is the warning sounded by Abraham Foxman, who has spent his life fighting racism and anti-Semitism, leading the Anti-Defamation League for decades, in the wake of last week’s deadly assault on the Capitol and with the US on alert for more violence.

Speaking to The Times of Israel a week after Trump fired up supporters some of whom then invaded the Capitol, and amid growing concern that extremists will again gather in DC and across the United States to try to disrupt the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, Foxman said Trump was a demagogue who had emboldened legions of bigots.

He said it was vital that Trump leave office “tarnished” — punished for his behavior — and barred from a future second presidential term. And he pleaded for a return of civility and respect in American discourse."

Trump bashing isn't an example of "Right wing fascim," it's Trump bashing.
 
Trump bashing isn't an example of "Right wing fascim," it's Trump bashing.

In the world of the low IQ right winger any truth about their master is "bashing" the gawd. We saw that before 2016, and we have seen it ever since. In another forum I go to the "host", a right wing toady like TA, wants to show Biden is a "tax cheat". Sad thing is that the claim is now being made as a deflection from the possible illegal acts of their gawd trump. Biden released his tax records, and nothing has come of it although the claim was made some 3 years ago. But where are trumps records? Not in the public domain for sure.

But that is the way of the right winger. Ask them a direct question they have no way of responding to, and you get the same bull shit, and lies, we see here. More of the "opinion" of TA, no facts to support it, just his usual lies, and then ignoring the questions asked.

"This did not begin with Donald Trump. The modern Republican Party may be particularly apt to push conspiracy theories to rationalize its complicity with a staggeringly corrupt administration, but this is an extension of, not a break from, a much longer history. Since its very beginning, in the 1950s, members of the modern conservative movement have justified bad behavior by convincing themselves that the other side is worse. One of the binding agents holding the conservative coalition together over the course of the past half century has been an opposition to liberalism, socialism, and global communism built on the suspicion, sometimes made explicit, that there’s no real difference among them.

In 1961, the American Medical Association produced an LP in which an actor opened a broadside against the proposed Medicare program by attributing to Norman Thomas, a six-time Socialist Party candidate for president, a made-up quote that “under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program.” Because these ideologies were so interchangeable in the imaginations of many conservatives—and were covertly collaborating to enact their nefarious agenda—this meant that it was both important and necessary to fight back through equally underhanded means.
One of the binding agents holding the conservative coalition together over the course of the past half century has been an opposition to liberalism, socialism, and global communism built on the suspicion, sometimes made explicit, that there’s no real difference among them.

The title of that LP? Ronald Reagan Speaks Out Against Socialized Medicine. The American left is used to waiting for liberals to finally get ruthless. Through the eyes of the right, they always have been.

Long before Fox News, conservatives began forming their own explicitly right-wing media landscape. Supporters of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal dominated the “mainstream” press, which meant that conservative dissidents needed a home. The conservative magazine Human Events was launched in 1944 as an alternative to what its cofounder, Felix Morley, believed was a stifling conformity in the American press. The same was true of the American Mercury in 1950, when under the ownership of William Bradford Huie the formerly social-democratic magazine moved to the right. “There is now far too much ‘tolerance’ in America,” Huie declared in the first issue of the new Mercury. “We shall cry a new crusade of intolerance . . . the intolerance of bores, morons, world-savers, and damn fools.”

https://washingtonmonthly.com/magaz...wing-convinces-itself-that-liberals-are-evil/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top