Peter Strzok is absolutely shameless

christiefan915 said:
Louie Gohmert embarrassed every repub with his mean-spirited comments. I guess he doesn't realize they could also be applied to trump.

“I can't help but wonder, when I see you looking there with a little smirk, how many times did you look so innocent into your wife's eyes and lie to her about Stormy Daniels, Jill Harth, Natasha Stoynoff et al. ?”
Click to expand...

It isn’t alleged that Trump was using the IC as a weapon against someone he loathed.

You realize that’s actually much more serious than the allegation that Trump colluding with Russians on campaign dirt, right?
 
Darth Omar said:
It isn’t alleged that Trump was using the IC as a weapon against someone he loathed.

You realize that’s actually much more serious than the allegation that Trump colluding with Russians on campaign dirt, right?
Click to expand...

Regarding this exchange... "Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it" ... it's nothing I didn't hear from every Hillary and Bernie supporter during the campaign.

Do repubs really think Strzok had some magic way of stopping trump from becoming president?
 
Old Trapper said:
There is always two sides to a story, unfortunately (as was proven yesterday in the "circus" called a "hearing), the Repugnant Party was only interested in one side, and then they had to lie to even come close to obtaining what they wanted. Strzok, a real patriot as compared to the cowards questioning him, put them all to shame (as if they had any shame).

https://www.salon.com/2018/07/12/ho...trzok-turns-embattled-fbi-agent-into-an-hero/
Click to expand...

I thought Strzok came off pretty creepy.

Inappropriate is the word I would use describe it. I had him pegged as a mere TDS afflicted Swamp dweeb with too much power but I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s something going on with him.

Maybe that was why Mullet gave him the boot. No way, the defense would let Strzok anywhere near the witness stand if it came down to it.
 
christiefan915 said:
Regarding this exchange... "Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it" ... it's nothing I didn't hear from every Hillary and Bernie supporter during the campaign.

Do repubs really think Strzok had some magic way of stopping trump from becoming president?
Click to expand...

The Insurance Policy comes to mind lol.

It’s entirely plausible that Strzok and ‘Andy’ had a plan to stop it. Many would argue it’s likely.
 
noise said:
FBI agent Peter Strzok was full of indignant outrage Thursday as he testified before Congress, and all sides reacted accordingly.

Heck, The New York Times didn’t even wait for him to say Word One before posting a story headlined, “FBI Agent at Center of Russia Probe Turns Tables on GOP.”

But then, the Times knew Strzok planned to say that the mere fact of his being questioned is a “victory notch in Putin’s belt.”

This, from a guy who’s been slammed by the Justice Department inspector general for his highly unprofessional conduct while serving on the investigations of Hillary Clinton and the Trump campaign.

His worst breach of ethics was to conduct an affair with another member of the team. That relationship couldn’t help but compromise his judgment, and hers.

Add to that the bias evidenced by all the lovers’ Trump-bashing text messages — and by the fact that they couldn’t even resist sending them on a system that they had to know their superiors could access.

Strzok and his inamorata, Lisa Page, can insist forever that their bias didn’t impact either probe, but their lack of restraint is proof that they’d lost all objectivity.

And the fact that their colleagues either saw no sign of the romance, or didn’t care, speaks poorly of their professionalism, too.

Democrats took Strzok’s claims at face value, literally applauding him at one point. Republicans stuck to their partisan points, too.

But the basic facts speak for themselves: With his flagrant misconduct, Peter Strzok brought shame to the FBI and the entire Justice Department. He should be ashamed of himself, rather than playing the victim.
https://nypost.com/2018/07/12/peter-strzok-is-absolutely-shameless/
Click to expand...


this is one of your funnier attempts
 
Darth Omar said:
I thought Strzok came off pretty creepy.

Inappropriate is the word I would use describe it. I had him pegged as a mere TDS afflicted Swamp dweeb with too much power but I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s something going on with him.

Maybe that was why Mullet gave him the boot. No way, the defense would let Strzok anywhere near the witness stand if it came down to it.
Click to expand...

I imagine most right wing puppets who lack the ability to think for themselves will feel the same way. Gowdy, Jordan, Goodlatte, and others, made fools of themselves, and that will remain to be the truth.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Has it crossed the mind of the hack who wrote that article that a LOT of people detest Trump, down to his tiny pussy-grabbing hands? They don't have to be part of the "Deep State" whatever the hell that is. Strzok is one of many such people, and that's ALL you have on him.

As for the snide insinuation that the Steele dossier "spurred" the FBI investigation - BULLSHIT. The dossier had nothing to do with starting the investigation. The timeline is all wrong, the FBI didn't even interview Steele until October 2016.




I'll say this one more time - if Strzok had been prepared to act unprofessionally, all he had to do was leak the fact that there was an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign's connections with agents of an unfriendly foreign power. Done with enough fanfare a week before the election, that would have fixed Trump, and good riddance.

But Strzok didn't do it. Nor did Comey, nor McCabe, nor any of your other boogeymen.


Added: I just noticed that the author of that hit-piece in the American Spectator is George Neumayr, an ultra-conservative Catholic who believes that Pope Francis has been put in place to destroy the Church.
Click to expand...
nope / If it was leaked, it would have set off alarm bells,and the fact there was no one interviewed by Strzok yet they stared an investigation over Papadopolis with nothing else would have drawn attention to the investigation.

They wanted secrecy, they wanted to try and entrap the Trump campaign with informants
and then they would have used that to corroborate the Steele dossier, and the fact the FBI investigation wasn't just a bunch of duplicate sources with no connection..

Hating Trump is one thing.
Being head of an investigation INTO the Trump campaign with the extreme animus shown by Strzok with talk of "insurance policies" ( which he never explained) and "Well stop Trump" ( which he forgot writing)
shows Strzok lies, and started the investigation over bar room gossip.

Why do you think the FBI will not show the EC to Congress? They started the investigation before July 2016
and they did out out of thin air
 
katzgar said:
but started by Washington Free Beacon sleaze bag
Click to expand...
dumb fuck.The Beacon ended the relationship. stop. full stop.

Clinton hired Fusion GPS,and used that to cover the fact they were hiring a foreign agent to get dirt from the Russians on Trump
 
oh. and we DID find out that Nellie Ohr ( who worked for Fusion) gave the Steele dossier to her husband Bruce Ohr
who worked for and turned it over to the FBI.

So the Clinton campaign, thru Fusion gave the unsubstantiated Steele dossier to the FBI -why?
To make sure the investigation relied heavily on Steele dossier for the FISA etc.
 
noise said:
somebody ought to smack that smrik off his face. Then fire him.

Like I said long ago the deep state plays the Russiaphobes, and the rubes eat it up.
Click to expand...

To be american is to be played; same as it ever was.

The US Is Empowering Nazis in Ukraine
https://therealnews.com/stories/the-us-is-empowering-nazis-in-ukraine

Congress Has Removed a Ban on Funding Neo-Nazis From Its Year-End Spending Bill
Under pressure from the Pentagon, Congress has stripped the spending bill of an amendment that prevented funds from falling into the hands of Ukrainian neo-fascist groups.
https://www.thenation.com/article/c...ng-neo-nazis-from-its-year-end-spending-bill/

Fweedumb.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
To be american is to be played; same as it ever was.

The US Is Empowering Nazis in Ukraine
https://therealnews.com/stories/the-us-is-empowering-nazis-in-ukraine
Click to expand...
That is an excellent link -thanks. Svobota are a bunch of neo-nazi thugs the US supported
in it's blind rage against Putin and his deals with Yanukovych. This is what John McCain was egging on

https://therealnews.com/stories/the-us-is-empowering-nazis-in-ukraine
Neo-Nazi militias are waging a campaign of terror across Ukraine attacking ethnic minorities, burning down Roma villages, assaulting innocent civilians, solely because of their racial background. And some of these fascist organizations have gotten direct funding from the Ukrainian state. The explicitly white supremacist militia C14 and the extreme-right party Svobota received grants from Ukraine’s Ministry of Youth and Sport.

But it’s not just Kiev that is supporting these dangerous neo-Nazi forces. The United States is also empowering fascists in Ukraine. Journalist Max Blumenthal has reported here at The Real News Network how the U.S. has armed the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, which is embedded in Ukraine’s national guard and is fighting pro-Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine. The Azov Battalion has published photos on its website showing its Nazi fighters meeting with American and Canadian military officers.

The Real News spoke with Larry Wilkerson, a former top official in the George W. Bush administration, who has become an outspoken critic of U.S. foreign policy. Wilkerson strongly condemned this bipartisan U.S. policy of supporting far-right extremists in Ukraine in the name of countering Russia.
 
noise said:
That is an excellent link -thanks. Svobota are a bunch of neo-nazi thugs the US supported
in it's blind rage against Putin and his deals with Yanukovych. This is what John McCain was egging on

https://therealnews.com/stories/the-us-is-empowering-nazis-in-ukraine
Neo-Nazi militias are waging a campaign of terror across Ukraine attacking ethnic minorities, burning down Roma villages, assaulting innocent civilians, solely because of their racial background. And some of these fascist organizations have gotten direct funding from the Ukrainian state. The explicitly white supremacist militia C14 and the extreme-right party Svobota received grants from Ukraine’s Ministry of Youth and Sport.

But it’s not just Kiev that is supporting these dangerous neo-Nazi forces. The United States is also empowering fascists in Ukraine. Journalist Max Blumenthal has reported here at The Real News Network how the U.S. has armed the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, which is embedded in Ukraine’s national guard and is fighting pro-Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine. The Azov Battalion has published photos on its website showing its Nazi fighters meeting with American and Canadian military officers.

The Real News spoke with Larry Wilkerson, a former top official in the George W. Bush administration, who has become an outspoken critic of U.S. foreign policy. Wilkerson strongly condemned this bipartisan U.S. policy of supporting far-right extremists in Ukraine in the name of countering Russia.
Click to expand...

America cannot exist without war, we must have more endless war.
 
Phantasmal said:
None of them? That’s sad you have none as friends.
Click to expand...
I have lots of liberal friends in Connecticut that I still visit and talk politics with in texts.
They all agree with an "ends justify the means" moral code. For example, they have no problem with an immigrant sneaking their children into a country illegally instead of a legal entry point. Laws don't mean much to liberals. But they sure do ask for lots of laws to be made.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top