Peter Strzok is absolutely shameless

noise said:
they wanted to try and entrap the Trump campaign with informants
and then they would have used that to corroborate the Steele dossier
Click to expand...

BUT

They started the investigation before July 2016
Click to expand...

Can you see what is wrong with that scenario, noise? If not, I'm willing to explain again. The FBI first interviewed Steele in October 2016. There is nothing to suggest that they had any detailed knowledge of the dossier until then.

So, from at least as early as July 2016, the FBI was trying to entrap the Trump campaign to corroborate details of a dossier which the FBI had never seen (and which didn't exist in its full form until months later).

Does that sound plausible?
 
Fentoine Lum said:
To be american is to be played; same as it ever was.

The US Is Empowering Nazis in Ukraine
https://therealnews.com/stories/the-us-is-empowering-nazis-in-ukraine

Congress Has Removed a Ban on Funding Neo-Nazis From Its Year-End Spending Bill
Under pressure from the Pentagon, Congress has stripped the spending bill of an amendment that prevented funds from falling into the hands of Ukrainian neo-fascist groups.
https://www.thenation.com/article/c...ng-neo-nazis-from-its-year-end-spending-bill/
Click to expand...

The end result of the conflict is important, the other stuff doesn't matter.
 
hvilleherb said:
The end result of the conflict is important, the other stuff doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

Not to fellow neonazis, we know. Let's take a look at our track record of late shall we?

Here's a list of folk we have armed/supported:

Saddam
Osama
Al Qaida
Al Nusra
ISIS
the Wahabist Islamist Saudis who actually were involved in 9/11
 
noise said:
somebody ought to smack that smrik off his face. Then fire him.

Like I said long ago the deep state plays the Russiaphobes, and the rubes eat it up.

Strzok is still standing / Rosenweasel plays the same Russian card yet again.
Brennan would be proud .
Click to expand...

:facepalm:
You calling others rubes.
:evilnod:
 
noise said:
FBI agent Peter Strzok was full of indignant outrage Thursday as he testified before Congress, and all sides reacted accordingly.

Heck, The New York Times didn’t even wait for him to say Word One before posting a story headlined, “FBI Agent at Center of Russia Probe Turns Tables on GOP.”

But then, the Times knew Strzok planned to say that the mere fact of his being questioned is a “victory notch in Putin’s belt.”

This, from a guy who’s been slammed by the Justice Department inspector general for his highly unprofessional conduct while serving on the investigations of Hillary Clinton and the Trump campaign.

His worst breach of ethics was to conduct an affair with another member of the team. That relationship couldn’t help but compromise his judgment, and hers.

Add to that the bias evidenced by all the lovers’ Trump-bashing text messages — and by the fact that they couldn’t even resist sending them on a system that they had to know their superiors could access.

Strzok and his inamorata, Lisa Page, can insist forever that their bias didn’t impact either probe, but their lack of restraint is proof that they’d lost all objectivity.

And the fact that their colleagues either saw no sign of the romance, or didn’t care, speaks poorly of their professionalism, too.

Democrats took Strzok’s claims at face value, literally applauding him at one point. Republicans stuck to their partisan points, too.

But the basic facts speak for themselves: With his flagrant misconduct, Peter Strzok brought shame to the FBI and the entire Justice Department. He should be ashamed of himself, rather than playing the victim.
https://nypost.com/2018/07/12/peter-strzok-is-absolutely-shameless/
Click to expand...

'Shameless' coming from Trump supporters is absolutely hilarious.

It all changes in November. :0)
 
tinfoil said:
I have lots of liberal friends in Connecticut that I still visit and talk politics with in texts.
They all agree with an "ends justify the means" moral code. For example, they have no problem with an immigrant sneaking their children into a country illegally instead of a legal entry point. Laws don't mean much to liberals. But they sure do ask for lots of laws to be made.
Click to expand...
I respect the laws and I want things to be handled within the law, I’m a liberal. I think a good percentage of liberals respect the laws, Taking children from their parents is cruel, however.
Generalizations are incorrect.
Both sides create too many laws.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Has it crossed the mind of the hack who wrote that article that a LOT of people detest Trump, down to his tiny pussy-grabbing hands? They don't have to be part of the "Deep State" whatever the hell that is. Strzok is one of many such people, and that's ALL you have on him.

As for the snide insinuation that the Steele dossier "spurred" the FBI investigation - BULLSHIT. The dossier had nothing to do with starting the investigation. The timeline is all wrong, the FBI didn't even interview Steele until October 2016.




I'll say this one more time - if Strzok had been prepared to act unprofessionally, all he had to do was leak the fact that there was an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign's connections with agents of an unfriendly foreign power. Done with enough fanfare a week before the election, that would have fixed Trump, and good riddance.

But Strzok didn't do it. Nor did Comey, nor McCabe, nor any of your other boogeymen.


Added: I just noticed that the author of that hit-piece in the American Spectator is George Neumayr, an ultra-conservative Catholic who believes that Pope Francis has been put in place to destroy the Church.
Click to expand...

The assumptions made in the article are so idiotic that even I am surprised noise is stupid enough to print it here.
 
christiefan915 said:
Regarding this exchange... "Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it" ... it's nothing I didn't hear from every Hillary and Bernie supporter during the campaign.

Do repubs really think Strzok had some magic way of stopping trump from becoming president?
Click to expand...

Clearly this is what they believe.
 
Darth Omar said:
I thought Strzok came off pretty creepy.

Inappropriate is the word I would use describe it. I had him pegged as a mere TDS afflicted Swamp dweeb with too much power but I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s something going on with him.

Maybe that was why Mullet gave him the boot. No way, the defense would let Strzok anywhere near the witness stand if it came down to it.
Click to expand...

The defense is Trump you moron.
Mueller is the prosecutor.
Again, why do you post here?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top