Peter Strzok is absolutely shameless

christiefan915 said:
Louie Gohmert embarrassed every repub with his mean-spirited comments. I guess he doesn't realize they could also be applied to trump.

“I can't help but wonder, when I see you looking there with a little smirk, how many times did you look so innocent into your wife's eyes and lie to her about Stormy Daniels, Jill Harth, Natasha Stoynoff et al. ?”
Click to expand...
They don't think long enough to realize anything. I loved hearing all of the trump bashing quotes from the Republican emails during the primaries.
 
Althea said:
trump is going to get on his knees and swallow Putin's communist sperm. Then, he's going to ask Putin for his next move, as Mueller is playing three dimensional chess while trump plays Chutes and Ladders.

Mueller just let trump know that the wolf is now at the door.
Click to expand...

You are one sick pervert...
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Has it crossed the mind of the hack who wrote that article that a LOT of people detest Trump, down to his tiny pussy-grabbing hands? They don't have to be part of the "Deep State" whatever the hell that is. Strzok is one of many such people, and that's ALL you have on him.

As for the snide insinuation that the Steele dossier "spurred" the FBI investigation - BULLSHIT. The dossier had nothing to do with starting the investigation. The timeline is all wrong, the FBI didn't even interview Steele until October 2016.




I'll say this one more time - if Strzok had been prepared to act unprofessionally, all he had to do was leak the fact that there was an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign's connections with agents of an unfriendly foreign power. Done with enough fanfare a week before the election, that would have fixed Trump, and good riddance.

But Strzok didn't do it. Nor did Comey, nor McCabe, nor any of your other boogeymen.


Added: I just noticed that the author of that hit-piece in the American Spectator is George Neumayr, an ultra-conservative Catholic who believes that Pope Francis has been put in place to destroy the Church.
Click to expand...
Don't waste your time trying to argue facts with him. He short circuited years ago, and is stuck in this delusion.

Shame, really.
 
Old Trapper said:
There is always two sides to a story, unfortunately (as was proven yesterday in the "circus" called a "hearing), the Repugnant Party was only interested in one side, and then they had to lie to even come close to obtaining what they wanted. Strzok, a real patriot as compared to the cowards questioning him, put them all to shame (as if they had any shame).

https://www.salon.com/2018/07/12/ho...trzok-turns-embattled-fbi-agent-into-an-hero/
Click to expand...
He came prepared with facts, while the whiny boys came with emotions and conspiracy theories they saw on Hannity.

November is just around the corner (wringing hands in anticipation)
 
Darth Omar said:
It isn’t alleged that Trump was using the IC as a weapon against someone he loathed.

You realize that’s actually much more serious than the allegation that Trump colluding with Russians on campaign dirt, right?
Click to expand...
On the one hand, you have 'allegations' that are meant to cloud the waters. Nothing else.

On the other hand, you have facts and evidence of trump's campaign colluding with Russian spies who were planted in the U.S.

If it helps you to understand the severity of this issue, just swap the name 'trump' for 'Clinton' in all of your silly claims.

See how that rolls off the tongue.
 
Loving91390 said:
Oh ... They WILL remember the next time an " FBI " issue erupts .

Stop being a jackass !
Click to expand...
The only 'FBI issue' that erupted, was Comey opening his big mouth just before the election. He was curiously silent about the deeper issue of Russian spies embedded in our country.
 
aloysious said:
I doubt it, as any rational person would. Do dims really believe da russians had some kind of magic way of getting trump elected?
Click to expand...
They didn't realize it until they had all of Clinton's internal election strategies, acquired by the embedded hackers.
 
noise said:
Yes that's the first interview -but did the S.Doss. become known before they sat down to interview Steele. Dates are squisy, sources are multi-counted and kited in..still could possible be legit if that all fit.
Click to expand...

The Trump-Russia investigation started at the latest July 2016. The Steele dossier could not have been a significant factor at that early stage, nor is it plausible to ascribe it to Strzok's "animus".

I think you know the likely grounds for starting the investigation. In case you've forgotten, here is a reminder:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia

I can see three possible takes on this.

1. It's fake news - the Guardian made it up, although they have never been known to do such a thing before.
2. British intelligence made it up and planted the story for reasons we can only speculate.
3. It's largely true.

Which do you go for?
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
The Trump-Russia investigation started at the latest July 2016. The Steele dossier could not have been a significant factor at that early stage, nor is it plausible to ascribe it to Strzok's "animus".

I think you know the likely grounds for starting the investigation. In case you've forgotten, here is a reminder:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia

I can see three possible takes on this.

1. It's fake news - the Guardian made it up, although they have never been known to do such a thing before.
2. British intelligence made it up and planted the story for reasons we can only speculate.
3. It's largely true.

Which do you go for?
Click to expand...
I mean a formal investigation, not just a 5 eyes inquiry.
again the EC is critical, as are all docs of that era
 
Althea said:
Nah. Sending the spies who set up the hacking ring was much more bang for the buck. The only problem is that his useful idiot couldn't keep his big mouth shut, and let the cat out of the bag.
Click to expand...
Meathead ( Rob Reiner) has a thing called Committee to Investigate Russia. It's a Hillary apology group for all I can tell, but it's got cute little ideas like "we are at war with Russia"

You have now joined Meathead -with sending "Russian hacking Rings"your post are more and more delusional.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
There were Russian undercover agents active in America during the 2016 campaign. They organized fake demonstations and the like.

Happens all the time, eh? Nothing for MAGA patriots to see here ...
Click to expand...

You realize the Russians organized demonstrations for AND against Trump, right?

How does that square with your theory?
 
Frank Apisa said:
Interesting take.

But considering the fact that you think Donald Trump is okay as our president...nobody should trust anything you say about any other human being.
Click to expand...

Right lol.

Did you see some of the faces Strzok was making? At times he looked like a petulant little school boy.

I have to think his performance didn’t play well amongst the non-TDS afflicted.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
There were Russian undercover agents active in America during the 2016 campaign. They organized fake demonstations and the like.

Happens all the time, eh? Nothing for MAGA patriots to see here ...
Click to expand...
no. there were no "Russians undercover in America" -they organized via FB-social media

http://fortune.com/2018/02/17/russian-organized-rallies-election-meddling/
“To conceal the fact that they were based in Russia, defendants and their co-conspirators promoted these rallies while pretending to be U.S. grassroots activists who were located in the United States but unable to meet or participate in person,” according to the indictment.

Pretending to be Americans, the Russians persuaded people in the U.S. to attend their events, and sometimes paid their expenses, according to the indictment. They allegedly used social-media names including Facebook group “Being Patriotic” and Twitter handle @March_for_Trump. Two such rallies were held in New York in July 2016, under the names “March for Trump” and “Down with Hillary,” it said.
 
Darth Omar said:
Right lol.

Did you see some of the faces Strzok was making? At times he looked like a petulant little school boy.

I have to think his performance didn’t play well amongst the non-TDS afflicted.
Click to expand...

Maybe so to the ones disappointed in the reality that he knew what he was talking about, while the Repugnant ones only knew what they were out to "prove". Kind of like the "Dentist" that was an "expert" on body language, or Gowdy with his "I don't care" comment. "Petulant little school boy"? When you are being harassed by liars, and cowards, with their false claims, and refusal to let him respond, how would you fare? Maybe you are another one of those "experts" on body language.
 
Darth Omar said:
Right lol.

Did you see some of the faces Strzok was making? At times he looked like a petulant little school boy.

I have to think his performance didn’t play well amongst the non-TDS afflicted.
Click to expand...

I agree...

...YOU HAVE TO THINK!

You are showing almost no evidence of doing that, Darth.

NOW...would be a good time to start.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top