Pfizer is still classified EUA with their liability shield

Stretch

New member
One letter went to Pfizer which is still EUA because it still has the liability shield. ( https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download )

The BioNtech vax is still in development, not ready for use yet and will be conditional until "fully approved" without a liability shield.
DHHS has issued a license to BioNTech (in Germany) controlling manufacture and sale of biological products. The license will then
authorize Pfizer to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce. That license will authorize them to manufacture
the product COVID-19Vaccine, MRNA. It will then be labeled by Pfizer as Comirnaty.

Also, the FDA completely bypassed the always necessary external advisory commissions with public comment period and unilaterally decided that there probably
wouldn't be any concerns that would have benefited from an advisory decision. Amazing. Sure. Nothing to see here. No questions. No cardio toxicity issues anywhere.
They just went ahead and authorized it. The only data they have is outdated because THIS Comirnaty is a brand new vax, not even on the market yet! Nothing in
there shows them dealing with the Delta variant. It's all about the original studies.

Plus the FDA letter only authorizes use for those 16 years of age and above. So, Deblasio needs to cool his jets on shooting up kids with this stuff. The studies
for kids won't be done until '23 or '24. Bet they'll probably shove another EUA out, this time for the kids.

The media and the pols have played a little shell game here and stated that the regular old Pfizer vax for EUA with its liability shield still in place
has the full formal approval. It does not. It will be the new one by the name of Comirnaty...in a couple years.

On page 6 they admit they do not have sufficient amount of data through VAERS system to determine risks properly. Unreal. But, they'll push it through.
They admit their system is inadequate, but again....so what. They'll just do what they want.
I see there that they at least acknowledge the myocardial issues and will require a 5 year follow-up.

They issued 2 separate letters for 2 separate vaccines.
The currant Pfizer still has the EUA classification and the liability shield. (no change) Pfizer always wants that liability shield.
The licensed BioNTech product, is similar, called Comirnaty, is not yet available until '23 or '24 and will not have a liability shield.

Nice bait and switch there lyin' fake state media! Show the public BOTH letters! Maybe just sloppy reporting and confused the two. LOL

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
 
.
This does deserve its own topic ... and as of this moment it is the last post on the two threads one the same subject of vax approval.

But alas, the dimlibs didn't read those, nor will they read this ... what a pity
 
One letter went to Pfizer which is still EUA because it still has the liability shield. ( https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download )

The BioNtech vax is still in development, not ready for use yet and will be conditional until "fully approved" without a liability shield.
DHHS has issued a license to BioNTech (in Germany) controlling manufacture and sale of biological products. The license will then
authorize Pfizer to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce. That license will authorize them to manufacture
the product COVID-19Vaccine, MRNA. It will then be labeled by Pfizer as Comirnaty.

Also, the FDA completely bypassed the always necessary external advisory commissions with public comment period and unilaterally decided that there probably
wouldn't be any concerns that would have benefited from an advisory decision. Amazing. Sure. Nothing to see here. No questions. No cardio toxicity issues anywhere.
They just went ahead and authorized it. The only data they have is outdated because THIS Comirnaty is a brand new vax, not even on the market yet! Nothing in
there shows them dealing with the Delta variant. It's all about the original studies.

Plus the FDA letter only authorizes use for those 16 years of age and above. So, Deblasio needs to cool his jets on shooting up kids with this stuff. The studies
for kids won't be done until '23 or '24. Bet they'll probably shove another EUA out, this time for the kids.

The media and the pols have played a little shell game here and stated that the regular old Pfizer vax for EUA with its liability shield still in place
has the full formal approval. It does not. It will be the new one by the name of Comirnaty...in a couple years.

On page 6 they admit they do not have sufficient amount of data through VAERS system to determine risks properly. Unreal. But, they'll push it through.
They admit their system is inadequate, but again....so what. They'll just do what they want.
I see there that they at least acknowledge the myocardial issues and will require a 5 year follow-up.

They issued 2 separate letters for 2 separate vaccines.
The currant Pfizer still has the EUA classification and the liability shield. (no change) Pfizer always wants that liability shield.
The licensed BioNTech product, is similar, called Comirnaty, is not yet available until '23 or '24 and will not have a liability shield.

Nice bait and switch there lyin' fake state media! Show the public BOTH letters! Maybe just sloppy reporting and confused the two. LOL

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

learn to read, sick hillbilly. good god. it is full approval of the current drug, idiot. from the fda letter you sourced-

Our STN: BL 125742/0 BLA APPROVAL
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH August 23, 2021
Attention: Amit Patel
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
Dear Mr. Patel:
Please refer to your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted and received on
May 18, 2021, under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) for
COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA.


What's the difference between an EUA and a BLA? - Bill of ...https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu › 2021/06/15
Jun 15, 2021 — A Biologics License Application, or BLA, is FDA's standard “full approval” mechanism for biological products, including therapeutics and ...
 
Yeah........their application for license has been approved.
Now go back and read the 1st letter regarding Pfizer...not BioNTech. It is still EUA only.
 
The op is still at it , posting scare info. If anyone takes her advice or gives it any credence and has a family member die because of it, I would not fault them for taking "corrective action"
 
The op is still at it , posting scare info. If anyone takes her advice or gives it any credence and has a family member die because of it, I would not fault them for taking "corrective action"
She is very misinformed, hope no one dies as a result of her stupidity.
 
learn to read, sick hillbilly. good god. it is full approval of the current drug, idiot. from the fda letter you sourced-

Our STN: BL 125742/0 BLA APPROVAL
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH August 23, 2021
Attention: Amit Patel
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
Dear Mr. Patel:
Please refer to your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted and received on
May 18, 2021, under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) for
COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA.


What's the difference between an EUA and a BLA? - Bill of ...https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu › 2021/06/15
Jun 15, 2021 — A Biologics License Application, or BLA, is FDA's standard “full approval” mechanism for biological products, including therapeutics and ...
YOU need to learn to read...

A "biological license application" has been approved, specifically for something called "Comirnaty". If the product does not have the "Comirnaty" name on it (e.g, if it were to say "Pfizer BioNtech"), then it is NOT an approved product and is still under EUA.

It is a bait and switch, an attempt to get people to think that the current Pfizer shots that they are receiving are now FDA approved. They are still NOT approved.
 
How is posting the actual publicly available letters (evidence) vs posting the lying media (intentional or not) a bad thing?
What harm is done by stating that the Pfizer vax remains as it has been? Classified as EUA. Millions of people
have been joyfully receiving that vax for months? Does a media error remove any more or any less of its effectiveness?
For anyone who wants that particular vax, does it now look tainted to you or them? It's still the same one that has been applauded
by those who choose it. It's no better and no worse than it has always been. Calling out the fake media for misrepresenting it
doesn't change it.

And, reading of how the FDA is letting a few things "slide" is pure information as stated in the letter. Does the portion of the public
who cares about seeing the FDA process for a medicine approval deserve to see it? The letter even states that they skipped the public
panel discussions on this.

Is it better done in secret and simply rejoice when media shouts out a desired end result that SOME people want to hear?
 
YOU need to learn to read...

A "biological license application" has been approved, specifically for something called "Comirnaty". If the product does not have the "Comirnaty" name on it (e.g, if it were to say "Pfizer BioNtech"), then it is NOT an approved product and is still under EUA.

It is a bait and switch, an attempt to get people to think that the current Pfizer shots that they are receiving are now FDA approved. They are still NOT approved.

you are too stupid to talk to. IT WAS APPROVED AS IS, STUPID FUCK. THEY DO NOT APPROVE DRUGS IN THE FUTURE, SHITHEAD.

Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines | CDChttps://www.cdc.gov › vaccines › different-vaccines
First, COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are given in the upper arm muscle. Once the instructions (mRNA) are inside the muscle cells, the cells use them to make the ...

Our STN: BL 125742/0 BLA APPROVAL
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH August 23, 2021
Attention: Amit Patel
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
Dear Mr. Patel:
Please refer to your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted and received on
May 18, 2021, under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) for
COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA.


What's the difference between an EUA and a BLA? - Bill of ...https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu › 2021/06/15
Jun 15, 2021 — A Biologics License Application, or BLA, is FDA's standard “full approval” mechanism for biological products, including therapeutics and ...
 
you are too stupid to talk to. IT WAS APPROVED AS IS, STUPID FUCK. THEY DO NOT APPROVE DRUGS IN THE FUTURE, SHITHEAD.

Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines | CDChttps://www.cdc.gov › vaccines › different-vaccines
First, COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are given in the upper arm muscle. Once the instructions (mRNA) are inside the muscle cells, the cells use them to make the ...

Our STN: BL 125742/0 BLA APPROVAL
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH August 23, 2021
Attention: Amit Patel
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
Dear Mr. Patel:
Please refer to your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted and received on
May 18, 2021, under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) for
COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA.


What's the difference between an EUA and a BLA? - Bill of ...https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu › 2021/06/15
Jun 15, 2021 — A Biologics License Application, or BLA, is FDA's standard “full approval” mechanism for biological products, including therapeutics and ...
I see that reading comprehension is still not your strong suit...
 
I see that reading comprehension is still not your strong suit...

It looks like media took a little from the 1st letter and a little from the 2nd letter, threw them in a blender and made a fake smoothie.
Pfizer letter shows extension of approval for EUA.
BioNTech (Comirnaty) letter shows application approval to go forward towards manufacturing, bottling, labeling, etc. with Pfizer.
Either it was intentional with forethought or unintentional with ignorance.
 
It looks like media took a little from the 1st letter and a little from the 2nd letter, threw them in a blender and made a fake smoothie.
Pfizer letter shows extension of approval for EUA.
BioNTech (Comirnaty) letter shows application approval to go forward towards manufacturing, bottling, labeling, etc. with Pfizer.
Either it was intentional with forethought or unintentional with ignorance.
Bingo... and my belief is that it was intentionally done (with forethought) in order to coerce "holdouts" into thinking that the Pfizer jab is now "FDA approved", and to coerce companies into implementing jab mandates.
 
Bingo... and my belief is that it was intentionally done (with forethought) in order to coerce "holdouts" into thinking that the Pfizer jab is now "FDA approved", and to coerce companies into implementing jab mandates.

Sounds about right. They don't want to wait until Comirnaty comes out. I even received a blast email
from my doctor's Physician Group today. They explained all the different options for the "rona" for their
patients and mentioned that the Comirnaty is not yet available to anyone requesting it.
 
Bingo... and my belief is that it was intentionally done (with forethought) in order to coerce "holdouts" into thinking that the Pfizer jab is now "FDA approved", and to coerce companies into implementing jab mandates.
I should note that the bolded also makes use of the assumption that "FDA approved" = "safe", which is anything BUT the truth...
 
learn to read, sick hillbilly. good god. it is full approval of the current drug, idiot. from the fda letter you sourced-

Our STN: BL 125742/0 BLA APPROVAL
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH August 23, 2021
Attention: Amit Patel
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
Dear Mr. Patel:
Please refer to your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted and received on
May 18, 2021, under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) for
COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA.


What's the difference between an EUA and a BLA? - Bill of ...https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu › 2021/06/15
Jun 15, 2021 — A Biologics License Application, or BLA, is FDA's standard “full approval” mechanism for biological products, including therapeutics and ...

So it’s an application for full approval lol?

Sweet. Shoot me up.
 
Sounds about right. They don't want to wait until Comirnaty comes out. I even received a blast email
from my doctor's Physician Group today. They explained all the different options for the "rona" for their
patients and mentioned that the Comirnaty is not yet available to anyone requesting it.
You'll get a kick out of the email that got passed along to me at work:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 23, 2021
Contact: GovPress@wisconsin.gov


Gov. Evers Launches $100 COVID-19 Vaccine Reward Program to Encourage Wisconsinites to Get Vaccinated
Wisconsinites will receive $100 by getting vaccinated now through September 6
OSHKOSH — Gov. Tony Evers today with the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) announced Wisconsin residents who receive their first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine from a Wisconsin provider between August 20 and September 6 can collect a $100 Visa gift card. Wisconsinites ages 12 and older are eligible for the reward, and proof of insurance, I.D., or citizenship are not required to be eligible for the vaccine or to receive the $100 reward.

“As our kids start returning back to school, and with the Delta variant spreading rapidly across the state, we all need to step up and stop the spread, and our COVID-19 vaccines are the best tools we have to do just that,” said Gov. Evers. “From now through Labor Day, if you’re a Wisconsin resident and you get your first COVID-19 shot here in the state, you will get $100 bucks. It’s that simple: get vaccinated, get $100. I'm calling on all eligible Wisconsinites who have not gotten their COVID-19 vaccine yet to step up, roll up their sleeve, and do their part to help protect our state and put an end to COVID-19.”

In order to receive the $100 Visa gift card, Wisconsin residents will need to fill out the form available at 100.wisconsin.gov. Information submitted will be used to verify that individuals received their first vaccine dose from a vaccine provider located in Wisconsin between August 20 and September 6. Visa cards will be mailed to the individual's Wisconsin address and may take up to six weeks to be mailed to participants.

For more information on the reward program, visit the DHS $100 reward page or call 844-684-1064. Language assistance is available. To find a COVID-19 vaccine location in your community, visit Vaccines.gov or call 2-1-1 or 877-947-2211.

“COVID-19 is continuing to spread and mutate into highly transmissible variants like the Delta variant. Fortunately, the science and data are showing us that we can protect ourselves and our loved ones by getting vaccinated,” said DHS Secretary-designee Karen Timberlake. “The vaccines are extremely safe. They are highly effective at preventing severe illness, hospitalization, and death. And they are critical to protecting our kids, our healthcare workers, and the most vulnerable people in our state. Let’s not give COVID-19 the opportunity to keep mutating: roll up your sleeve, get your vaccine, and claim your $100.”

Many Wisconsinites face financial barriers to access the COVID-19 vaccine—factors such as transportation, childcare, or the inability to take time off from work which can make it difficult for many to get vaccinated. The $100 COVID-19 Vaccine Reward Program will provide some additional support to those wanting to get protected against COVID-19. In addition to this reward, Wisconsinites can call 2-1-1 to get assistance finding transportation. There are also some services being offered by national companies listed on the COVID-19 Vaccine Incentives webpage. For those who have been financially impacted by the pandemic, visit the COVID-19 Response Resources webpage for a list of available support services.

The $100 COVID-19 Vaccine Reward Program is part of the ongoing effort to stop the spread of the highly transmissible Delta variant by encouraging Wisconsinites to get vaccinated. Wisconsin continues to experience an increase of COVID-19 cases, driven by the Delta variant. The Delta variant is much more contagious than the original strain of COVID-19. With the original strain of COVID-19, an infected person was likely to infect two other people who are likely to infect two additional people for a total of six cases from one infection. With the Delta variant, an infected person is likely to infect five people which can lead to an approximate total of 30 cases from just one infection.

While vaccination is the most important layer of protection against COVID-19, with the high-level of disease transmission in Wisconsin, DHS is urging everyone to add more layers of protection including masking up indoors and staying home when feeling sick.

To stay up-to-date on COVID-19 and to learn more about how to stay protected, subscribe to the DHS COVID-19 Weekly Newsletter.
 
Why do you care? You won't get the shot no matter what. No one gives a shit what excuse you have for being a fucking moron and a selfish asshole.
 
Back
Top